· Public charity
Global Teen Challenge Inc
Tjo receive and administer funds and operate exclusively for religious, charitable, scientific, literary, and educational purposes.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2022.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 1 grants below total $1,401,916 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $1,483,315 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $81,399 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| VARIOUS | $1,401,916 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY21–21, $5k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +38% since the first grant, against +19% for the ones you funded once.
4 repeat relationships — 0 still active in FY2022, 4 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2022 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2022, 0% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1.4M went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- TCTEEN CHALLENGE OF FLORIDA INC5× · 2017–2021 · $612k · revenue +18%
- GTGlobal Teen Challenge3× · 2017–2019 · $70k
- TCTEEN CHALLENGE INTERNATIONAL NEOSHO MO TEEN CHALLENGE OF THE FOUR STATES5× · 2017–2021 · $65k · revenue +38%
Funded once
- TCTEEN CHALLENGE INTERNATIONAL PACIFIC NORTHWEST CENTERSone grant, 2021 · $525k
- TCTeen Challenge de Puerto Rico Incone grant, 2021 · $67k · revenue +13%
- GCGENERAL COUNCIL OF THE ASSEMBLIES OF GODone grant, 2017 · $63k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The religious organization's mission is to help individuals who have life-controlling addictions and initiate the discipleship process to the point where the individual can function as a productive christian member of society.
Drug and alcohol addiction recovery program that is desinged to help young men find a new way of living that includes an introduction to christian principles.
A 12-15 month residential program to help men ages 18-64 become free from life controlling addictions.
The mission of teen challenge of baltimore is to provide individuals and their families with an effective and comprehensive faith-based solution to substanceabuse and life-controlling issues in order for them to become productivemembers of…
None
To rehabilitate young adults afflicted with a variety of life altering addictions through counseling and teaching
Drug rehabilitation of men and women through christian discipleship and training.
A faith-based residential recovery program to help individuals attain freedom form chemical addictions by addressing their spiritual, physical and emotional needs.
Teen challenge is the home of the faith-based recovery program where lives are changed. we are committed to rekindling hope, renewing life, and restoring families by reaching out to men and women with life-controlling problems.
Promote the gospel of christ through christian discipleship to help people become mentally sound,emotionally balanced, socially adjusted, physically well, spiritually alive and employment ready.
To facilitate life transformation through christ-centered programs. our faith-based christian substance abuse programs work to develop teens mentally, physically, emotionally and spiritually.
His Hope Teen Challenge offers hope to individuals struggling with addiction through support groups, outreach programs, missional recovery homes, and a referral program.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Teen Challenge of Florida Inc and the most unlike its peers is Lift Up America. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 16 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds TEEN CHALLENGE OF FLORIDA INC ↗
- Who funds Teen Challenge de Puerto Rico Inc ↗
- Who funds TEEN CHALLENGE INTERNATIONAL NEOSHO MO TEEN CHALLENGE OF THE FOUR STATES ↗
- Who funds LIFT UP AMERICA ↗
- Who funds GREATER NEW ORLEANS TEEN CHALLENGE ↗
- Who funds A BETTER WAY MINISTRIES INC ↗
- Who funds Teen Challenge Illinois ↗
- Who funds HONEY LAKE CLINIC INC ↗
- Who funds TEEN CHALLENGE OF ST LOUIS INC ↗
- Who funds ADULT & TEEN CHALLENGE USA ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Global Teen Challenge Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Global Teen Challenge Inc?
Find your warmest path to Global Teen Challenge Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.