Skip to content
Global Technology Industry Association Inc at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

Global Technology Industry Association Inc

The organization is dedicated to advancing information technology industry growth through its educational programs, market research, networking events, professional certifications, and public policy advocacy.

$1.1M
Granted FY2024still arriving
13
Grants FY2024still arriving
9
States reached
$313k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Employment$27MEducation$3.1MYouth Development$430kArts & Culture$200kInternational$134kHuman Services$133kPublic Benefit$86kScience & Tech$40kOther$0
02FY2024 · 13 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 13 grants below total $680,500, the rows itemized in this filing. The $1,130,070 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $449,570 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k1 grant · $8k
  • $10k–50k9 grants · $186k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $175k
  • $250k+1 grant · $313k
$18,000
Median grant
9
States reached
$161M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
TECHNOLOGYSTUDENT ASSOCIATION$312,500
AMERICA SUCCEEDS$100,000
INSPIRING TECH FOUNDATION$75,000
TECH FOR TROOPS$45,000
STARLIGHT CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION$35,000
THE TRUSTEES OF PRINCETON UNIVERSITY$20,000
OUTREACH INC$18,000
OUT IN TECH$17,500
HEALTH AND MEDICAL RESEARCH$15,000
ON RAMPS TO CAREERS$15,000
THE POSSE FOUNDATION$10,000
GIRLS EMBRACING MOTHERS$10,000
BLACK WOMEN IN TECHNOLOGY$7,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–24, $182k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 94% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%NATIONAL ALLIANCE FOR PARTNERSHIPS IN EQUITY: $5k → 9%BLACK WOMEN IN TECHNOLOGY: $8k → 12%KEEP ON PUSHING FOUNDATION: $10k → 14%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT: $5k → 14%THE EMPOWERMENT PLAN: $11k → 21%CHICHTECH: $50k → 12%SERVICE INC OF ILLINOIS: $6k → 7%CHICHTECH: $25k → 12%CRADLES TO CRAYONS: $15k → 14%CRADLES TO CRAYONS: $10k → 14%GIRLS WHO CODE INC: $15k → 17%GIRLS WHO CODE: $15k → 17%GIRLS WHO CODE: $8k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

NH
WA
MN
IL
WI
MI
NY
MA
OR
IA
PA
NJ
CA
UT
CO
VA
MD
KS
NC
SC
DC
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

95%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$30M · 25 repeat orgs$1.5M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +28% since the first grant, against +14% for those funded once.

25 repeat relationships: 7 still active in FY2024, 18 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

25
42

Total granted

$30M
$1.3M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+28%
+14%

Still filing today

92%
76%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 81% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $133k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
EducationHuman ServicesEmploymentYouth DevelopmentInternationalPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TS
    TECHNOLOGY STUDENT ASSOCIATION
    6× · 2019–2024 · $1.6M · revenue +21%
  • AS
    AMERICA SUCCEEDS
    2× · 2023–2024 · $450k · revenue +64% · 30% of their budget
  • WA
    Womens Audio Mission
    4× · 2017–2022 · $250k · revenue +114%

Funded once

  • CT
    COMPTIA TECH CAREER ACADEMY
    one grant, 2018 · $750k · revenue +11% · 100% of their budget
  • NA
    NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF GOVERNMENT TECHNOLOGY ALLIANCE PARTNERS
    one grant, 2022 · $50k
  • GW
    GENESYS WORKSgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $35k · revenue +338%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Global Technology Industry Association Inc

The organization is dedicated to advancing information technology industry growth through its educational programs, market research, networking events, professional certifications, and public policy advocacy.

—
2
America On Tech Inc

Prepare the next generation of technology leaders from underestimated communities by helping students obtain degrees and careers in technology

Education
3
Techcongress Foundation

Techcongress gives talented technologists the opportunity to gain first-hand experience in federal policymaking and shape the future of tech policy through fellowships with members of congress and congressional committees.

Community Improvement
4
Techbridge Inc

Techbridge breaks the cycle of generational poverty through the innovative use of technology to transform nonprofit and community impact. techbridge's work is focused on four pillars: hunger relief, homeless support, social justice and…

Philanthropy
5
Girls in Tech Inc

Girls in tech is a social networking enterprise focused on the engagement, education and empowerment of like-minded, professional, intelligent and influential women in technology fields around the world.

—
6
NextOp Inc

NextOp helps place talented enlisted service members and veterans into civilian careers through highly individualized preparation and an array of programming.

Public Benefit
7
The Common Application Inc

The common application is a not-for-profit membership organization of over 1,100 colleges and universities across the globe committed to access, equity, and integrity in the college admission process. every year, over 1.5 million students…

Education
8
Technology Policy Institute
International
9
Future Tech Insights Inc

The organization provides public education on artificial intelligence.

Public Benefit
10
Internet Society Foundation

At the internet society foundation, we focus on funding initiatives that strengthen the internet in function and reach so that it can effectively serve all people. our work advances the vision of the internet society (isoc): the internet…

International
11
Code to Work Inc

An employer-led initiative aimed at transforming the hiring process. we use a skills-based approach to identify, train and hire talent. the traditional credentials-based focus must evolve to give all qualified job seekers a chance to prove…

—
12
Girls in Stem
Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Girls Who Code Inc; the most unlike its peers is Keep On Pushing Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

65 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 65 of the 73 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

5
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
9
Early backer (in before they grew)
61/65
Grantees still filing
38/65
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

GTIA FOUNDATION INC: $26,190,364 · EmploymentGTIA FOUNDATION INC+4 more: $363,250 · EmploymentTECHNOLOGY STUDENT ASSOCIATION: $1,643,786 · EducationCHICAGO TECH ACADEMY: $150,000 · Education+12 more: $305,000 · EducationCOMPTIA TECH CAREER ACADEMY: $750,000 · OtherTECHGIRLZ CHARITABLE TRUST: $75,000 · OtherNPOWER INC: $55,000 · OtherNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF GOVERNMENT TECHNOLOGY ALLIANCE PARTNERS: $49,571 · Other+30 more: $511,000 · OtherINSPIRING TECH FOUNDATION: $400,000 · Youth DevelopmentGirls Embracing Mothers Inc: $320,000 · Youth DevelopmentJUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT USA: $30,000 · Youth Development+2 more: $15,000 · Youth DevelopmentAMERICA SUCCEEDS: $450,000 · Arts & CultureINTERNATIONAL SPY MUSEUM: $50,000 · Arts & CultureChickTech: $75,000 · Human ServicesGIRLS WHO CODE INC: $38,000 · Human ServicesCRADLES TO CRAYONS INC: $25,000 · Human ServicesTHE EMPOWERMENT PLAN: $10,535 · Human ServicesKEEP ON PUSHING FOUNDATION: $10,000 · Human ServicesBlack Women in Technology: $7,500 · Human Services+3 more: $15,771 · Human ServicesSO THEY CAN: $51,000 · InternationalOUTREACH INC: $33,120 · InternationalHEART TO HEART INTERNATIONAL INC: $20,000 · InternationalInternational Rescue Committee INC: $10,000 · International
Employment$26,553,614Education$2,098,786Other$1,440,571Youth Development$765,000Arts & Culture$500,000Human Services$181,806International$114,120

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetGTIA FOUNDATION INC: $26,190,364 over 6y, 78% of budgetTECHNOLOGY STUDENT ASSOCIATION: $1,643,786 over 6y, 15% of budgetCOMPTIA TECH CAREER ACADEMY: $750,000 over 1y, 100% of budgetAMERICA SUCCEEDS: $450,000 over 2y, 30% of budgetINSPIRING TECH FOUNDATION: $400,000 over 3y, 90% of budgetGirls Embracing Mothers Inc: $320,000 over 2y, 41% of budgetWomens Audio Mission: $250,000 over 4y, 5.8% of budgetCHICAGO TECH ACADEMY: $150,000 over 2y, 2.8% of budgetPER SCHOLAS INC: $75,750 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetChickTech: $75,000 over 2y, 4.7% of budgetTECHGIRLZ CHARITABLE TRUST: $75,000 over 2y, 9.8% of budgetTECH IMPACT: $65,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetNPOWER INC: $55,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetINTERNATIONAL SPY MUSEUM: $50,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetTECH FOR TROOP: $45,000 over 1y, 4.3% of budgetHIRE HEROES USA INC: $45,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetOUT IN TECH INC: $40,000 over 3y, 0.9% of budgetGIRLS WHO CODE INC: $38,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetGENESYS WORKS: $35,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetSTARLIGHT CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION: $35,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetOUTREACH INC: $33,120 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetJUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT USA: $30,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetON-RAMPS TO CAREERS INC: $30,000 over 3y, 3.5% of budgetNATIONAL CRISTINA FOUNDATION INC: $30,000 over 1y, 1.7% of budgetMINNESOTA TECHNOLOGY FOUNDATION INC: $30,000 over 3y, 2.7% of budgetTHE INNOCENT LIVES FOUNDATION: $30,000 over 1y, 3.2% of budgetCANDID: $30,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetINNER-CITY COMPUTER STARS FOUNDATION: $30,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetFEDERATION OF GALAXY EXPLORERS INC: $30,000 over 3y, 19% of budgetGREATER CHICAGO FOOD DEPOSITORY: $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCODEORG: $25,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetCRADLES TO CRAYONS INC: $25,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetSPECIAL OPERATORS TRANSITION FOUNDATION INC: $20,000 over 1y, 1.8% of budgetHEART TO HEART INTERNATIONAL INC: $20,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICA SHARE USA INC: $20,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetThe Trustees of Princeton University: $20,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHEALTH & MEDICAL RESEARCH CHARITIES OF AMERICA: $15,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetThe Pew Charitable Trusts: $11,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE EMPOWERMENT PLAN: $10,535 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetCHARLOTTE AREA TECHNOLOGY COLLABORATIVE: $10,000 over 1y, 12% of budgetBE THE CHANGE INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetIT-OLOGY: $10,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetNETHOPE INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetInternational Rescue Committee INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetIMENTOR INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWEST SUBURBAN HUMANE SOCIETY: $10,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetTHE POSSE FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFriendship Place: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Silicon Valley Commun…Tides FoundationMotorola Solutions Fo…Rockefeller Philanthr…Salesforce FoundationThe Yelp FoundationTruist Foundation IncSeattle FoundationThe Blackbaud Giving …Verizon FoundationImpactassetsincGs Donor Advised Phil…
Silicon Valley Community FoundationCA16.1× affinity12 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Silicon Valley Community Foundation · Tides Foundation · Motorola Solutions Foundation · Rockefeller Philanthropy Advisors Inc · Salesforce Foundation · The Yelp Foundation · Truist Foundation Inc · Seattle Foundation · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Verizon Foundation · Impactassetsinc · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Global Technology Industry Association Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Global Technology Industry Association Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 30%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 2%
  • The Trustees of Princeton University: 11% of income from government
  • Cradles to Crayons Inc: 2% of income from government
  • Wounded Warrior Project Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
3get no government money at all
18report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 73 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Global Technology Industry Association’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home