Skip to content

· Private foundation

Global Faith Project Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$962k
Granted FY2025still arriving
21
Grants FY2025still arriving
6
States reached
$345k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Religion$1.2MRecreation & Sports$975kFood & Nutrition$140kEducation$80kYouth Development$46kHuman Services$32kCivil Rights$15kInternational$6kOther$0
02FY2025 · 21 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k8 grants · $38k
  • $10k–50k8 grants · $219k
  • $50k–250k4 grants · $360k
  • $250k+1 grant · $345k
$20,000
Median grant
6
States reached
$578k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
THE GREATER DALLAS COALITION$345,184
PHILO TRUST$143,200
EPISCOPAL DIOCESE OF DALLAS$87,000
FULLER THEOLOGICAL SEMINARY$80,000
Individual grant recipient$50,000
JOSHUA NATIONS$49,575
LEADERSHIP RESOURCES GROUP$40,000
Individual grant recipient$39,000
ONE YOUTH GLOBAL$25,000
DALLAS INTERNATIONAL STREET CHURCH$20,000
CHRIST FOR THE CITY INTERNATIONAL$20,000
METROPOLITAN DREAM CENTER$15,000
Individual grant recipient$10,000
NEW HOPE FELLOWSHIP OF ALEXANDRIA$8,000
INSPIRED VISION COMPASSION CENTER$7,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

US giving: 74% of grant dollars ($1.8M). The need read here covers only this US portion; the 26% that went abroad ($636k) is mapped below.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY25–25, $25k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 80% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%ONE VOICE MINISTRIES: $5k → 14%THREADED: $5k → 5%METROPOLITAN DREAM CENTER: $15k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Beyond the US: 26% of all-years giving ($636k)

5 countries, by the recipient’s country on the filing.

grant dollars sentlessmore
United Kingdom$398k · 4 grants
France$116k · 3 grants
Cuba$77k · 2 grants
Nigeria$25k · 1 grant
Afghanistan$20k · 3 grants
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving. International giving is mapped by the recipient’s country from the same 990 filings; comparable need data isn’t available at that grain.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

88%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$2.2M · 12 repeat orgs$293k to everyone else

12 repeat relationships: 11 still active in FY2025, 1 since wound down; 10 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

12
11

Total granted

$2.2M
$127k

Still filing today

8%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 83% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $166k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesReligionEducationHealthYouth DevelopmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TG
    THE GREATER DALLAS COALITION
    6× · 2020–2025 · $975k
  • PT
    PHILO TRUST
    5× · 2020–2025 · $484k
  • IV
    INSPIRED VISION COMPASSION CENTER
    3× · 2023–2025 · $140k

Funded once

  • FT
    FULLER THEOLOGICAL SEMINARY
    one grant, 2024 · $50k
  • CO
    CHURCH OF THE INCARNATION
    one grant, 2024 · $17k
  • MD
    METROPOLITAN DREAM CENTER
    one grant, 2024 · $12k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
A Blessing to the Nations

Religious ministry

Religion
2
Invest Your Life Ministries Inc

Sharing the Gospel of Jesus Christ through counseling, coaching, and speaking.

Human Services
3
Gospel Recovery Network

Bringing glory to god through lives changed by the gospel of jesus christ by connecting people and resources, equipping churches and engaging culture.

Religion
4
Wesley Paul International Ministries

Evangelize the unchurched. see the year in review attached. mission trips to egypt, india, argentina, ethiopa, kenya, uk, korea and malaysia

Religion
5
Rescue and Revive Ministries Inc

Rescuing the lost and reviving the saved with the everlasting gospel of jesus christ.

Religion
6
Rendered Powerful

To minister the gospel of jesus christ

Religion
7
Global Pastor Training

To equip under-equipped pastors serving the lords church among the poor in africa and around the world

Religion
8
Come to Life Ministries

Come to life ministries exists to come alongside and offer encouragement to ministry leaders, strengthen great commission and great commandment ministries within the local church, and to help people see the bible as alive and personally…

Religion
9
Leadership Institute

To equip church leaders to equip more church leaders.

—
10
Light in the World Ministries

Christian Pastoral Leadership and Bible Training

International
11
Source Ministries International Incorporated

Christian Teaching Writing Biblical Counseling and Missions

Religion
12
Global Transformation International

Prayer network for gospel ministry

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Young Life; the most unlike its peers is One Voice. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 33 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
1/8
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

THE GREATER DALLAS COALITION: $975,118 · OtherTHE GREATER DALLAS COALITIONPHILO TRUST: $484,000 · OtherPHILO TRUSTINSPIRED VISION COMPASSION CENTER: $139,500 · OtherINSPIRED VISION COMPASSION CENTEREPISCOPAL DIOCESE OF DALLAS: $120,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $116,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $79,000 · Other+19 more: $370,325 · Other+19 moreFULLER THEOLOGICAL SEMINARY: $80,000 · EducationLEADERSHIP RESOURCES GROUP INC: $60,000 · Religion+1 more: $2,000 · ReligionMETROPOLITAN DREAM CENTER INC: $15,000 · Human ServicesOne Voice: $5,000 · Human ServicesTHREADED: $5,000 · Human ServicesHOPE RESTORATION MINISTRIES: $5,000 · HealthYOUNG LIFE: $750 · Youth Development
Other$2,283,943Education$80,000Religion$62,000Human Services$25,000Health$5,000Youth Development$750

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetFULLER THEOLOGICAL SEMINARY: $80,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetLEADERSHIP RESOURCES GROUP INC: $60,000 over 2y, 30% of budgetHOPE RESTORATION MINISTRIES: $5,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetTHREADED: $5,000 over 1y, 2.1% of budgetBARBARA YANDELL MINISTRIES: $2,000 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetYOUNG LIFE: $750 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds FULLER THEOLOGICAL SEMINARY ↗
  • Who funds LEADERSHIP RESOURCES GROUP INC ↗
  • Who funds METROPOLITAN DREAM CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds One Voice ↗
  • Who funds HOPE RESTORATION MINISTRIES ↗
  • Who funds THREADED ↗
  • Who funds BARBARA YANDELL MINISTRIES ↗
  • Who funds YOUNG LIFE ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Natl Christian Charitable Fdn IncGA8.5× affinity4 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Global Faith Project Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Global Faith Project Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%3%10%23%40%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Global Faith Project Inc?

    Find your warmest path to Global Faith Project Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 33 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Global Faith Project’s filings →

    More from the funding graph