Skip to content

· Public charity

Global Action Institute

GLOBAL ACTION INSTITUTE utilizes a network of domestic and international security professionals and humanitarian advocates to deliver vital supplies, such as life-saving equipment, nourishment, and clothing to children and adults in vulnerable communities.

$253k
Granted FY2024still arriving
6
Grants FY2024still arriving
5
States reached
$35k
Largest
01What it funds
01FY2024 · 6 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 6 grants below total $116,450, the rows itemized in this filing. The $252,644 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $136,194 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k1 grant · $5k
  • $10k–50k5 grants · $111k
$25,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$16M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
BREAK FREE MINISTRY$35,000
WHEATON COLLEGE$25,000
JH RANCH INTERNATIONAL$25,000
PLUM CREEK COMMUNITY CHURCH$15,000
GIVE REFUGEES A CHANCE$11,000
ATLANTA INTERNATIONAL SCHOOL INC$5,450
02The need
02

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY24–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 66% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%JH RANCH INTERNATIONAL: $25k → 16%ATLANTA INTERNATIONAL SCHOOL INC: $5k → 13%PLUM CREEK COMMUNITY CHURCH: $15k → 3%BREAK FREE MINISTRY: $35k → 9%GIVE REFUGEES A CHANCE: $11k → 9%WHEATON COLLEGE: $25k → 7%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Grants abroad, by region: $38k on the FY2024 return

Schedule F, as filed: 1 region. The IRS asks for region and purpose, not the recipient, so no country or grantee can be named here.

Israel$38k · 100% · 4 grants

Stated purpose: SUPPORT FOR FAMILIES WHO LOST THEIR HOMES · SUPPORT FOR FIRST RESPONDERS

How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving. Grants abroad on Schedule F are filed by region, purpose and amount with no recipient name, so they are shown by region and cannot be placed on the country map or matched to a grantee.
03Its field
03the grantee network

5 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 5 of the 6 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
5/5
Grantees still filing
3/5
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Second Wind Programs Inc: $25,000 · OtherSecond Wind Programs IncPLUM CREEK COMMUNITY CHURCH: $15,000 · OtherPLUM CREEK COMMUNITY CHURCHBF BBOY MINISTRIES: $35,000 · ReligionBF BBOY MINISTRIESWheaton College: $25,000 · EducationWheaton CollegeATLANTA INTERNATIONAL SCHOOL: $5,450 · EducationATLANTA INTERNATIONAL SCHOOLGrace Foundation The Grace Foundation: $11,000 · InternationalGrace Foun…
Other$40,000Religion$35,000Education$30,450International$11,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetBF BBOY MINISTRIES: $35,000 over 1y, 12% of budgetWheaton College: $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSecond Wind Programs Inc: $25,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetGrace Foundation The Grace Foundation: $11,000 over 1y, 23% of budgetATLANTA INTERNATIONAL SCHOOL: $5,450 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Natl Christian Charitable Fdn IncGA9.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Global Action Institute funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Global Action Institute. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%2%6%14%25%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 6 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Global Action Institute’s filings →

    More from the funding graph