Skip to content

California · Private foundation

Glenview Womans Club

Its FY2017 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$26k
Granted FY2017
16
Grants FY2017
16
Organizations funded FY2017
Read the full brief
Median grant, FY2017
$1,000
Largest grant, FY2017
$5,000
States reached, FY2017
4
Applications
Preselected organizations only
Per its most recent filing; check its own site

Top grantees

Largest recipients by total granted, FY2017 to FY2017, and the share of each one’s budget the grants supplied at peak.

Show all 11 grantees

Plus 5 recipients with no EIN on record ($10k), not named here.

Where it is load-bearing

Each grantee by its size and the share of its budget Glenview Womans Club supplied at peak.

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetPiedmont Yoga Community: $3,500 over 1y, 15% of budgetBest Friends Animal Society: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAlameda County Community Food Bank: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetThe American Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFeeding Pets of the Homeless Aka Pets of the Homeless: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetWings of Rescue Inc: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHopalong Animal Rescue: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetLindsay Wildlife Museum: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetDusty Paws Rescue Inc: $1,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetHumane World for Animals Inc: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget

Tap a dot to name the grantee.

How this is measured
Share of budget is the funder’s grant in a year over the grantee’s total revenue that year, at its highest across the years we hold; revenue is from all sources. Only grantees confirmed against their own filings, whose grants do not exceed their revenue, are plotted: the largest 10.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a set of overlaps that mostly run through this funder rather than between each other.

Amazonsmile FoundationWA3.3× affinity4 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Compare Glenview Womans Club with peer funders

About Glenview Womans Club

How much does Glenview Womans Club give?
Glenview Womans Club reported 16 grants totaling $25,600 in its FY2017 IRS filing.
What does Glenview Womans Club fund?
By grant dollars over FY2017 to FY2017, its largest causes are Animals (47%), Education (20%), Health (14%).
Who are Glenview Womans Club's largest grantees?
By total granted over FY2017 to FY2017: Piedmont Yoga Community ($4k), Best Friends Animal Society ($3k), Alameda County Community Food Bank ($2k).
Does Glenview Womans Club accept unsolicited applications?
Its most recent filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and does not take unsolicited requests. Check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
Which funders back the same organizations as Glenview Womans Club?
Its strongest co-funders, measured against what their size predicts, include Amazonsmile Foundation.
Where is Glenview Womans Club based?
Glenview Womans Club is based in CA.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 16 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2017, released 2017. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Glenview Womans Club’s filings →

More from the funding graph