Skip to content
Glendale Foundation at a glance

· Private foundation

Glendale Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$46k
Granted FY2025still arriving
12
Grants FY2025still arriving
5
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
0199% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Human Services$83kArts & Culture$50kFood & Nutrition$38kAnimals$37kReligion$27kHealth$11kEducation$10kPhilanthropy$6kOther$0
02FY2025 · 12 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k10 grants · $26k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $20k
$2,500
Median grant
5
States reached
$685k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
TARNOFF ART CENTER$10,000
ZETA BETA TAU FOUNDATION$10,000
GERIATRIC SERVICES INC$6,000
THE HUMANE SOCIETY OF NAPLES$6,000
YESHIVA & MESIVTA TORAS EMES KAMENITZ$5,000
NEW YORK COMMON PANTRY$2,500
TABLE TO TABLE$2,000
MSK GIVING$2,000
MEALS ON WHEELS NORTH JERSEY$1,000
CALVARY TEMPLE OF WAYNE$500
TEANECK VOLUNTEER AMBULANCE$500
JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER OF MIDDLESEX$500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–25, $83k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 75% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%Southampton Day Care Center: $1k → 7%JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER OF MIDDLESEX: $5k → 8%JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER OF MIDDLESEX: $3k → 8%JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER OF MIDDLESEX COUNTY: $3k → 8%JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER OF MIDDLESEX: $1k → 8%JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER OF MIDDLESEX: $500 → 8%JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER OF MIDDLESEX: $500 → 8%BAKER SENIOR CENTER NAPLES: $20k → 10%SHELTER FOR ABUSED WOMEN AND CHILDREN: $20k → 10%SHELTER FOR ABUSED WOMEN AND CHILDREN: $10k → 10%GERIATRIC SERVICES INC: $6k → 7%GERIATRIC SERVICES INC: $5k → 7%GERIATRIC SERVICES INC: $5k → 7%GERIATRIC SERVICES INC: $4k → 7%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

73%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$193k · 13 repeat orgs$71k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +20% since the first grant, against 0% for those funded once.

13 repeat relationships: 11 still active in FY2025, 2 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

13
18

Total granted

$193k
$61k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+20%
0%

Still filing today

69%
61%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 78% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $10k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
AnimalsHuman ServicesFood & NutritionHealthEducationHousing & ShelterOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • THE SHELTER FOR ABUSED WOMEN & CHILDREN INC
    2× · 2023–2024 · $30k · revenue +8%
  • PATTY BAKER HUMANE SOCIETY NAPLES INC
    6× · 2020–2025 · $25k · revenue +63%
  • GS
    GERIATRIC SERVICES INC
    4× · 2022–2025 · $20k · revenue +6%

Funded once

  • BS
    BAKER SENIOR CENTER NAPLES INCgraduated
    one grant, 2024 · $20k · revenue +31%
  • NY
    NEW YORK STUDIO SCHOOLgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $10k · revenue +26%
  • NT
    Naples Therapeutic Riding Center Inc
    one grant, 2023 · $4k · revenue -52%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Grateful Paws

Grateful Paws NJ is a non-profit organization devoted to rescuing stray and abandoned animals throughout New Jersey, providing medical care and helping them to find new homes.

Animals
2
Nassau Humane Society Inc

Provides rescue, shelter, veterinary care, and adoption services for homeless and abandoned pets in nassau county, florida. services include animal intake, medical treatment, rehabilitation, daily care, and placement into permanent homes.…

Animals
3
Flagler Humane Society Inc

We transform the lives of animals with compassionate care and services, outstanding educational programs, and advocacy for all animals.

Animals
4
Florida Pointer Rescue Inc

Rescue pointer dogs and treat back to health and f

Animals
5
Gulf Coast Humane Society Inc

Our mission at gulf coast humane society is to care for companion pets in need by offering safe refuge, providing medical care and facilitating adoptions.

Animals
6
Petpals of Southern New Jersey Inc

To provide assistancve in caring for the companion animals of people living with terminal or chronic illnesses as well as financially needy senior citizens.

Community Improvement
7
Tri County Humane Society

Tri-county animal rescue is a no-kill, nonprofit animal shelter working to prevent the killing of over 573,000 unwanted pets in broward, miami-dade, and palm beach counties. tri-county has no boundaries; we go all over the u.s. whenever we…

Animals
8
Palm Beach Island Cats Inc

Manage the feral cat population in Palm Beach, Florida

Animals
9
Humane Society of Greater Miami-Dade for Pocta Aap

Matching furry friends with their purr-fect homes & offering affordable spay/neuter.

Animals
10
Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Tampa Bay Florida Inc

Spca tampa bay is a 501(c)(3) nonprofit organization that operates pinellas county's only nonprofit for-all animal shelter assisting all animals in need, regardless of species or circumstance, at its 10-acre campus in largo. (continued on…

Animals
11
Southwest Florida Spay Neuter Serv

The organization is run by a veterinarian with a small staff to provide affordable care to pet owners, animal rescue organizations and work in cooperation with trap-neuter-vaccinate-release providers to control feral cat populations.

Animals
12
Capic-Cat Adoption and Pet Information Center

Capic rescues animals and gets them new homes and does tnr for the community as well as adopting animals, spay neuters returns, and helps owners who cannot afford medical help and vetting on their own We also feed hundreds of animals feral…

Animals
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Shelter for Abused Women & Children Inc; the most unlike its peers is Teaneck Volunteer Ambulance Corps. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

22 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 22 of the 33 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
22/22
Grantees still filing
15/22
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

TARNOFF ART CENTER: $35,000 · OtherTARNOFF ART CENTERYESHIVA & MESIVTA TORAS EMES KAMENITZ: $20,000 · OtherYESHIVA & MESIVTA TORAS EMES KAMENITZPASCACK VALLEY MEALS ON WHEELS INC: $14,000 · OtherPASCACK VALLEY MEALS ON WHEELS INCNEW YORK STUDIO SCHOOL: $10,000 · OtherNEW YORK STUDIO SCHOOL+12 more: $22,350 · Other+12 moreTHE SHELTER FOR ABUSED WOMEN & CHILDREN INC: $30,000 · Human ServicesTHE SHELTER FOR ABUSED WOMEN & CHIL…BAKER SENIOR CENTER NAPLES INC: $20,000 · Human ServicesBAKER SENIOR CENTER NAPLES INCGERIATRIC SERVICES INC: $19,500 · Human ServicesGERIATRIC SERVICES INCJEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER OF MIDDLESEX COUNTY INC: $12,000 · Human ServicesJEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER OF MIDDLESE…+1 more: $1,000 · Human ServicesPATTY BAKER HUMANE SOCIETY NAPLES INC: $25,000 · AnimalsPATTY BAKER HU…THE 11TH HOUR ANIMAL RESCUE INC T/A ELEVENTH HOUR ANIMAL RESCUE: $2,500 · AnimalsTHE 11TH HOUR …MARTY'S PLACE SENIOR DOG SANCTUARY: $2,500 · AnimalsMARTY'S PLACE …BIRD GARDENS OF NAPLES INC: $2,000 · AnimalsBIRD GARDENS O…For the Love of Cats Inc: $2,000 · AnimalsFor the Love o…NEW YORK COMMON PANTRY: $13,500 · Food & NutritionNEW YORK …TABLE TO TABLE INC: $9,500 · Food & NutritionTABLE TO …ZETA BETA TAU FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 · EducationAnimal Compassion Project Inc: $2,500 · EducationFRIENDS OF YAD SARAH INC: $7,000 · HealthNaples Therapeutic Riding Center Inc: $4,000 · HealthJamaica Outreach Program Inc: $2,500 · Housing & Shelter
Other$101,350Human Services$82,500Animals$34,000Food & Nutrition$23,000Education$12,500Health$11,000Housing & Shelter$2,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE SHELTER FOR ABUSED WOMEN & CHILDREN INC: $30,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetPATTY BAKER HUMANE SOCIETY NAPLES INC: $25,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetBAKER SENIOR CENTER NAPLES INC: $20,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetGERIATRIC SERVICES INC: $19,500 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetPASCACK VALLEY MEALS ON WHEELS INC: $14,000 over 5y, 0.8% of budgetNEW YORK COMMON PANTRY: $13,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetJEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER OF MIDDLESEX COUNTY INC: $12,000 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetNEW YORK STUDIO SCHOOL: $10,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetTABLE TO TABLE INC: $9,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetFRIENDS OF YAD SARAH INC: $7,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetNaples Therapeutic Riding Center Inc: $4,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE 11TH HOUR ANIMAL RESCUE INC T/A ELEVENTH HOUR ANIMAL RESCUE: $2,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetJamaica Outreach Program Inc: $2,500 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetCOLLIER COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMARTY'S PLACE SENIOR DOG SANCTUARY: $2,500 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetAnimal Compassion Project Inc: $2,500 over 1y, 2.4% of budgetTEANECK VOLUNTEER AMBULANCE CORPS: $2,350 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetBIRD GARDENS OF NAPLES INC: $2,000 over 1y, 2.1% of budgetNAPLES HISTORICAL SOCIETY INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetFor the Love of Cats Inc: $2,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetSOUTHAMPTON DAY CARE FOUNTAIN OF YOUTH INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Brookdale Foundat…Community Foundation …Jewish Communal FundRaymond James Charita…National Philanthropi…The Pfizer Foundation…American Endowment Fo…Morgan Stanley Global…The Bank of America C…American Online Givin…Vanguard Charitable E…Fidelity Investments …
The Brookdale FoundationNJ13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 10 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Brookdale Foundation · Community Foundation of New Jersey · Jewish Communal Fund · Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund · National Philanthropic Trust · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · American Endowment Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Glendale Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Glendale Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 70%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%15%30%45%60%share of the org’s income from government →median 2%
  • The Shelter for Abused Women & Children Inc: 2% of income from government
  • The 11TH Hour Animal Rescue Inc T/a Eleventh Hour Animal Rescue: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
7get no government money at all
9report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–60%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Glendale Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Glendale Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 33 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Glendale’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home