· Private foundation
Glen and Diane Williams Family Foundation
Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k4 grants · $21k
- $10k–50k2 grants · $20k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| DOGGETT CENTER NC STATE CATHOLIC CA | $10,000 |
| CAMP UNITED METHODIST CHURCH | $10,000 |
| ST JOSEPH CHURCH | $6,000 |
| OAK CITY CARES | $5,000 |
| CASA | $5,000 |
| CATHOLIC PARRISH OUTREACH FOOD | $5,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–23, $41k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 86% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +82% since the first grant, against +27% for the ones you funded once.
10 repeat relationships — 2 still active in FY2024, 8 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 24% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $31k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- TWTHE WOMEN'S INITIATIVE3× · 2019–2021 · $21k · revenue +91%
- SPSAMARITAN'S PURSE2× · 2022–2023 · $13k · revenue +40%
- DFDown for a Cure Inc2× · 2017–2018 · $7k · revenue +289%
Funded once
THE MASONIC HOME FOR CHILDREN AT OXFORD INCone grant, 2023 · $30k · revenue +9%- CPCATHOLIC PARISH OUTREACH FOOD PANTRone grant, 2020 · $14k
- MFMARCH FOR LIFE ACTIONgraduatedone grant, 2023 · $8k · revenue +25%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To fight hunger and poverty in northeastern north carolina.
Feeding Charlotte rescues surplus, freshly prepared meals to reduce food waste and feed the hungry. We believe no food should be wasted while people go hungry in our community. To make this possible, we pickup unused, excess freshly…
Project milk mission is at the forefront of a vital mission - reducing infant mortality rates by championing breastfeeding, with a special focus on supporting low-income african american mothers. through comprehensive services spanning the…
To provide responsive, person-centered services to improve the quality of life of individuals with disabilities.
To respond to the growing need in our community by providing immediate assistance to residents of Concord, Kannapolis, and Cabarrus County, NC who are experiencing crisis in the areas of food, shelter or finances while providing them…
Nourish people. build solutions. empower communities. no one goes hungry.
Javesca Feeds purpose is to raise awareness and provide relief to help end hunger and malnutrition in poverty-stricken areas of the U.S. and around the world by connecting individual and corporate funding with front-line human relief…
Southlight healthcare provides access to high-quality mental health and substance use treatment, fostering a resilient community by supporting individuals in their recovery.
To feed people by soliciting and distributing food and other products through partner agencies and educating the community about the nature of and solutions to problems of hunger.
Families first of palm beach county, through innovative programs, promotes generational change by addressing families emotional, physical, and social well-being.
Seeking to put Gods love into action, Habitat for Humanity brings people together to build homes, communities and hope to realize our vision of a world where everyone has a decent place to live. Habitat for Humanity of North Carolina…
Table delivers healthy food and provides nutrition education to food insecure children living in orange county, nc to support their accessibility and knowledge of healthy food and eating habits.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Oak City Cares Inc and the most unlike its peers is Samaritan's Purse. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
18 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 18 of the 32 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds CASA ↗
- Who funds THE MASONIC HOME FOR CHILDREN AT OXFORD INC ↗
- Who funds THE WOMEN'S INITIATIVE ↗
- Who funds SAMARITAN'S PURSE ↗
- Who funds MARCH FOR LIFE ACTION ↗
- Who funds Down for a Cure Inc ↗
- Who funds OAK CITY CARES INC ↗
- Who funds Unbound ↗
- Who funds CHARLOTTESVILLE FREE CLINIC ↗
- Who funds A PLACE AT THE TABLE ↗
- Who funds BRUNSWICK SENIOR RESOURCES INC ↗
- Who funds STEPUP MINISTRY ↗
- Who funds Brunswick Family Assistance Agency Inc ↗
- Who funds Pediatric Brain Tumor Foundation of the United States Inc ↗
- Who funds THE GREEN CHAIR PROJECT ↗
- Who funds ALL BLESSINGS FLOW INC ↗
- Who funds FED IS BEST FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds NORTH CAROLINA COASTAL FEDERATION INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Duke Energy Foundation · North Carolina Community Foundation · W Trent Ragland Jr Foundation · A E Finley Foundation Inc · Triangle Community Foundation Inc · Sears Family Foundation Inc · Gipson Family Foundation · Aj Fletcher Foundation · John William Pope Foundation · The Winston-Salem Foundation · Wells Fargo Foundation · Truist Foundation Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Glen and Diane Williams Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.