How much did GLEN AND DIANE WILLIAMS FAMILY grant in FY2024?

A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 48% of GLEN AND DIANE WILLIAMS FAMILY’s grantee dollars go to organizations outside the IRS cause taxonomy (common for large international and research funders), so a chart would be mostly “unclassified” and misrepresent the portfolio.

02beneath the categories

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Beneath the NTEE codes, this is what the grant descriptions actually say.

…and in their own words, year by year

2018

—

2019

—

2020

brunswickcoastal

2021

—

2022

—

2023

—

2024

churchcatholic

Words distinctive to each year’s grant purposes (TF-IDF) · event-driven terms in cyan.

03FY2024 · 6 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

Under $10k4 grants · $21k
$10k–50k2 grants · $20k

$6,000

Median grant

States reached

$813k

Total assets

Largest grants

DOGGETT CENTER NC STATE CATHOLIC CA$10,000
CAMP UNITED METHODIST CHURCH$10,000
ST JOSEPH CHURCH$6,000
OAK CITY CARES$5,000
CATHOLIC PARRISH OUTREACH FOOD$5,000
CASA$5,000

02The need

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY20–20, $6k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8% — the area typically sits at 8%. 18% of those dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge

repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

50%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.

$134k · 10 repeat orgs$133k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +101% since the first grant, against +69% for the ones you funded once.

10 repeat relationships — 2 still active in FY2024, 8 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

Total granted

$134k

$102k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+101%

+69%

Still filing today

60%

56%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 24% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $31k went to new ones.

RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

HealthHuman ServicesHousing & ShelterCivil RightsReligionFood & NutritionOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

CASA
4× · 2021–2024 · $63k · revenue +29%
TW
THE WOMENS INITIATIVE
3× · 2019–2021 · $21k · revenue +101%
SP
SAMARITANS PURSE
2× · 2022–2023 · $13k · revenue +134%

Funded once

MH
MASONIC HOME FOR CHILDREN
one grant, 2023 · $30k
CP
CATHOLIC PARISH OUTREACH FOOD PANTR
one grant, 2020 · $14k
SV
ST VINCENT DE PAUL OUR LADY OF LOU
one grant, 2019 · $8k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

Carolina Abortion Fund

The Carolina Abortion Fund supports individuals who have decided to have an abortion by providing financial, logistical, and emotional support.

Health

Breast Cancer Action

Breast cancer action's mission is to achieve health justice for all women at risk of and living with breast cancer.

Unclassified

The Barnabas Network

The Barnabas Network provides basic home furnishings at no cost to qualified families and individuals on the path to self-sufficiency. Their clients are transitioning out of homelessness, recovering from a major setback, fleeing abuse or…

Human Services

Brunswick Partnership for Housing Inc

The mission of Brunswick County Partnership for Housing is to provide services to individuals and families in Brunswick County who are homeless and advocate for the development of affordable housing.

Housing & Shelter

United Way of the Cape Fear Area Inc

47,636 lives impacted by investing $3,202,315 in 71 local programs. Our vision is a united community that is healthy, safe and prosperous for everyone. United Way of the Cape Fear Area (UWCFA) serves Brunswick, Columbus, New Hanover and…

Philanthropy

Habitat for Humanity of Nc Inc

Seeking to put Gods love into action, Habitat for Humanity brings people together to build homes, communities and hope to realize our vision of a world where everyone has a decent place to live.

Housing & Shelter

Brain Injury Association of Nc

The brain injury association of north carolina's mission is to create a better future for approximately 200,000 north carolinians living with brain injury and their families by advancing research, education, treatment, support, prevention,…

—

Charlotte Family Housing

The mission of Charlotte Family Housing is to empower working families experiencing homelessness to achieve long-term self-sufficiency through shelter, housing, supportive services, and advocacy.

Human Services

Wnc Lighthouse Inc

The mission of WNC Lighthouse Inc is Changing lives, by being a light for Christ our Lord. Our vision is To be fully devoted to Jesus Christ, by opening our arms and providing Christian services to the underseved children, adults and…

Human Services

Charlotte Neuroscience Foundation

To impact the lives of individuals living with cognitive impairment and movement disorders as well as those who care for them, to provide patients with specialized medical care through an in-depth assessment of the medical, safety and…

Health

Charlotte Institute for Faith and Work

The Charlotte Institute for Faith & Work was founded by a group of people who believe that God cares about our everyday work. It's through our work, from cleaning public restrooms to creating investment portfolio strategies, that God cares…

—

Meals on Wheels of Asheville and Buncombe County Inc

Meals On Wheels - Help for our Homebound The mission of Meals On Wheels of Asheville-Buncombe County is to provide hot, nutritious meals to the elderly homebound, thus allowing them to live in their own homes.

Food & Nutrition

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Charlottesville Free Clinic and the most unlike its peers is Brunswick Senior Resources Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

05the grantee network

16 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.

Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)

Early backer (in before they grew)

16/16

Grantees still filing

13/16

Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Other$129,050Housing & Shelter$68,500Health$35,500Religion$12,500Human Services$8,500Civil Rights$7,500Food & Nutrition$4,000Science & Tech$1,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

North Carolina Community FoundationNC21.5× affinity8 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: North Carolina Community Foundation · Duke Energy Foundation · Triangle Community Foundation Inc · Sears Family Foundation Inc · A E Finley Foundation Inc · W Trent Ragland Jr Foundation · United Way of the Greater Triangle Inc · Lochbaum Family Charitable Trust · Bell Cook Family Foundation · Bell Koonce Burnette Foundation · Aj Fletcher Foundation · John William Pope Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organisation GLEN AND DIANE WILLIAMS FAMILY funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024

’20’21’22’23’24

no gov moneyreceives it· size = income

0get no government money at all

0rely on government for over half their income

typical government reliance, FY20–24

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Through Plinth

Your grantmaking, live and operational

This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: MARCH FOR LIFE.

Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk

Financial management

insufficient risk

Limited financial data in public filings.

Track record & reputation

medium risk

4 years of Form 990 filings, still active.

Legal standing

low risk

US 501(c)(3); EIN 521059820 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.

Governance

Live in Plinth

Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.

Compliance & sanctions

Live in Plinth

OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.

Program capacity

Live in Plinth

Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.

Live · Plinth’s real DD engine

Run the actual assessment on MARCH FOR LIFE, cold from public data.

Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.

Post-award monitoring · continuous checks

Awaiting reportFinancial stability— Runway not derivable from filings.
On trackSustained operations— Filing through 2024; revenue contracted over the period.
On trackReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 10% of their budget — diversified.
Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.

What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.

Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing

Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro

How do I get to Glen and Diane Williams Family?

Find your warmest path to Glen and Diane Williams Family through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.

Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.

GLEN AND DIANE WILLIAMS FAMILY

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

16 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Glen and Diane Williams Family?

More from the funding graph

GLEN AND DIANE WILLIAMS FAMILY

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

16 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Glen and Diane Williams Family?

More from the funding graph