Skip to content

· Public charity

Givio Charitable Foundation

Promoting innovation that removes barriers to giving, GIVIO CHARITABLE FOUNDATION equips, trains, and energizes new generations of donors to connect with the nonprofits that need us most.

$238k
Granted FY2024still arriving
5
Grants FY2024still arriving
4
States reached
$105k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2024.

Food & Nutrition$143kHousing & Shelter$131kHealth$85kReligion$82kEducation$49kCommunity Improvement$42kArts & Culture$25kYouth Development$18kOther$0
02FY2024 · 5 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 5 grants below total $154,002, the rows itemized in this filing. The $238,191 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $84,189 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k3 grants · $18k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $32k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $105k
$6,400
Median grant
4
States reached
$1.2M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
VERMONT FARM BUREAU FOUNDATION FOR AGRICULTURE$104,631
LUCILE PACKARD FOUNDATION FOR CHILDREN'S HEALTH$31,561
STEWPOT COMMUNITY SERVICES$6,400
BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF NORTH LAKE TAHOE$6,000
FRIENDS OF THE CENTRAL RAPPAHANNOCK REGIONAL LIBRARY$5,410
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–23, $28k) land where the poverty rate runs at 6%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%DAHLGREN HERITAGE FOUNDATION: $5k → 7%FOOD FOR OTHERS: $9k → 6%FOOD FOR OTHERS: $7k → 6%FOOD FOR OTHERS: $7k → 6%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

VT
NH
WA
NY
CA
VA
MD
TN
DC
OK
MS
GA
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

57%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$289k · 6 repeat orgs$215k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +37% since the first grant, against +29% for those funded once.

6 repeat relationships: 2 still active in FY2024, 4 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

6
16

Total granted

$289k
$197k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+37%
+29%

Still filing today

67%
81%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 88% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $18k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24
HealthEducationInternationalFood & NutritionHuman ServicesArts & CultureOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • VF
    VERMONT FARM BUREAU FOUNDATION FOR AGRICULTURE
    2× · 2023–2024 · $115k
  • LP
    LUCILE PACKARD FOUNDATION FOR CHILDREN'S HEALTH
    2× · 2023–2024 · $65k · revenue -13%
  • FO
    FEDERATION OF SOUTHERN COOPERATIVES
    3× · 2021–2023 · $42k · revenue +37%

Funded once

  • ZK
    ZHYTY KHOCHU
    one grant, 2022 · $76k
  • ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INCgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $13k · revenue +29%
  • JT
    JOURNEY THROUGH HALLOWED GROUND PARTNERSHIPgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $12k · revenue +77%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Southwestern Vermont Healthcare Foundation Inc

The sole purpose of the svhc foundation shall be to engage in development and fundraising activities exclusively for the support of the southwestern vermont health care corporation and affiliates.

Health
2
South Shore Charter School

The mission of south shore charter school is to cultivate students the tenacity, integrity, and curiosity needed to become innovative and socially responsible leaders, ready to face and solve the ever-changing challenges facing our…

Education
3
Southwestern Vermont Medical Center

Southwestern vermont health care exists to provide exceptional health care and comfort to the people we serve. see schedule o for additional details.

Health
4
St Luke Community Hospital

The mission of st. luke community healthcare is to remain an integral component of the communities of the mission valley through the delivery of personal, compassionate, quality health care in a dignified manner that values our patients,…

Health
5
University Cooperative School

We take a joyful, community-oriented approach to raising engaged citizens, deep learners, and brave adventurers with the skills, creativity, and heart needed to better the world.

—
6
Community Foundation Santa Cruz County

To promote philanthropy to make santa cruz county a better place to live, now and in the future.we bring together people, ideas, and resources to inspire philanthropy and accomplish great things.

Philanthropy
7
American Gas Association

American gas association's (the association) mission is to develop and advocate for informed, innovative, and durable policy that fulfills our nation's energy needs, environmental aspirations and economic potential. we are committed to…

—
8
Sonoma Charter School

Sonoma charter school seeks to achieve academic excellence through engaged learning in a setting that involves students, teachers, and parents.

Education
9
San Francisco Friends School

At san francisco friends school, students learn in a community grounded in the quaker values of reflection, integrity, peaceful problem-solving and stewardship. our teachers challenge students with a dynamic curriculum that inspires…

Education
10
United States Telecom Association

See schedule oustelecom exists to ensure members can compete, grow and thrive to build a world where families, enterprises and communities are connected through the power of broadband.our member companies have committed a considerable…

—
11
Sound Credit Union

A member owned cooperative providing financial services, including loans and share deposits to its members.

—
12
Saratoga Care Inc

To serve the people of the Saratoga region by providing them access to excellence in healthcare in a supportive and caring environment.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Sierra Club Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Dmv Music Academy. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

21 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 21 of the 26 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
21/21
Grantees still filing
13/21
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

VERMONT FARM BUREAU FOUNDATION FOR AGRICULTURE: $114,631 · OtherVERMONT FARM BUREAU FOUNDATION FOR AGRICULTUREZHYTY KHOCHU: $76,416 · OtherZHYTY KHOCHUSTADIUM HIGH SCHOOL BOOSTERS: $30,908 · OtherSTADIUM HIGH SCHOOL BOOSTERSPATHWAY HOMES: $14,209 · OtherUnited States Association for UNHCR: $10,670 · OtherTACOMA KIDZ: $11,994 · Other+7 more: $43,354 · Other+7 moreDestination Home SV co Silicon Valley Community Foundation: $100,000 · Housing & ShelterDestination Home S…LUCILE PACKARD FOUNDATION FOR CHILDREN'S HEALTH: $65,176 · HealthLUCILE PACKARD F…ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $13,284 · HealthST JUDE CHILDREN…PATHWAY HOMES INC: $10,473 · HealthPATHWAY HOMES IN…FEDERATION OF SOUTHERN COOPERATIVES: $41,544 · Food & NutritionLove Thy Neighbor King George: $5,601 · Food & NutritionFOOD FOR OTHERS INC: $22,385 · Human ServicesDAHLGREN HERITAGE FOUNDATION: $5,355 · Human ServicesJOURNEY THROUGH HALLOWED GROUND PARTNERSHIP: $12,240 · Arts & CultureDMV MUSIC ACADEMY: $7,350 · Arts & CultureMINGO VALLEY CHRISTIAN SCHOOL: $7,126 · EducationLACONIA CHRISTIAN ACADEMY INC: $5,840 · EducationFRIENDS OF THE CENTRAL RAPPAHANNOCK REGIONAL LIBRARY INC: $5,410 · Education
Other$302,182Housing & Shelter$100,000Health$88,933Food & Nutrition$47,145Human Services$27,740Arts & Culture$19,590Education$18,376

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetDestination Home SV co Silicon Valley Community Foundation: $100,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetLUCILE PACKARD FOUNDATION FOR CHILDREN'S HEALTH: $65,176 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFEDERATION OF SOUTHERN COOPERATIVES: $41,544 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetSTADIUM HIGH SCHOOL BOOSTERS: $30,908 over 3y, 40% of budgetFOOD FOR OTHERS INC: $22,385 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $13,284 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJOURNEY THROUGH HALLOWED GROUND PARTNERSHIP: $12,240 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetTACOMA KIDZ: $11,994 over 1y, 45% of budgetUnited States Association for UNHCR: $10,670 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPATHWAY HOMES INC: $10,473 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMINGO VALLEY CHRISTIAN SCHOOL: $7,126 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $6,725 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSTEWPOT COMMUNITY SERVICES INC: $6,400 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetAMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION FOUNDATION INC: $6,035 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF NORTH LAKE TAHOE: $6,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetLACONIA CHRISTIAN ACADEMY INC: $5,840 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetLove Thy Neighbor King George: $5,601 over 1y, 3.1% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE CENTRAL RAPPAHANNOCK REGIONAL LIBRARY INC: $5,410 over 1y, 4.0% of budgetSIERRA CLUB FOUNDATION: $5,390 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDAHLGREN HERITAGE FOUNDATION: $5,355 over 1y, 8.3% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

National Philanthropic TrustPA5.4× affinity4 shared granteesties to 5 of 5Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: National Philanthropic Trust · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Givio Charitable Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Givio Charitable Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    2get no government money at all
    5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Givio Charitable Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Givio Charitable Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 26 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Givio’s filings →

    More from the funding graph