Skip to content

· Private foundation

Giving University

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$410k
Granted FY2025still arriving
23
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$65k
Largest
01What it funds
0189% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Religion$2.2MCivil Rights$982kInternational$816kYouth Development$673kHuman Services$540kHealth$318kCommunity Improvement$273kCrime & Legal$196kOther$0
02FY2025 · 23 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k3 grants · $15k
  • $10k–50k18 grants · $274k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $121k
$11,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$606k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Individual grant recipient$65,000
Individual grant recipient$55,645
Every Nations Church Bhutan$35,000
Individual grant recipient$30,300
New Day for Children$30,000
SOLVA$24,824
Friends Lanka Child Foundation$14,000
Freedom House Foundation$12,100
Individual grant recipient$12,000
Coast Hills Church$12,000
Physically Challenged Action Foundation$12,000
Surf n' Turf$11,000
Youth for Christ International$11,000
United Bible Theological College$10,000
Individual grant recipient$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

US giving: 90% of grant dollars ($6.5M). The need read here covers only this US portion; the 10% that went abroad ($749k) is mapped below.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–24, $221k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 42% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.

area typical 10%Growing Place: $1k → 18%Made in Hope: $2k → 9%Hallies Heroes: $5k → 8%Elijah Rising: $2k → 16%Adelante Mujeres: $1k → 8%Open Door Community House: $1k → 18%Foster Source: $5k → 10%San Juan Island Fam Resource Ctr: $1k → 10%Street Teens: $25 → 13%Scarlet Hope: $5k → 15%Chrysalis Shelter: $1k → 11%A Sense of Home: $3k → 14%WhiteRock Center of Hope: $1k → 14%Denver Rescue Mission: $1k → 12%Canine Support Teams: $50 → 11%House of Ruth: $1k → 14%Hitching Post Ministries: $30k → 11%Foundation for Women Warriors: $1k → 14%Equine Empowered Therapy: $1k → 10%Blast 4 Kids: $5k → 11%Hitching Post Ministries: $15k → 11%Hitching Post Ministries: $15k → 11%Hitching Post Ministries: $5k → 11%Patriots and Paws: $1k → 10%Lauras House: $1k → 10%Marys Shelter: $1k → 10%OC United: $60k → 10%OC United: $49k → 10%OC United: $5k → 10%Acres of Love: $50 → 10%Caterinas Club: $2k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
MN
IL
MI
NY
MA
OR
NV
OH
PA
CA
UT
CO
NE
MO
KY
VA
DE
AZ
TN
NC
DC
HI
AL
GA
TX
FL

Beyond the US: 10% of all-years giving ($749k)

17 countries, by the recipient’s country on the filing.

grant dollars sentlessmore
Afghanistan$150k · 5 grants
Canada$65k · 1 grant
Kenya$61k · 2 grants
Nigeria$60k · 1 grant
Colombia$56k · 2 grants
Hong Kong$55k · 2 grants
Cambodia$46k · 2 grants
Ghana$41k · 4 grants
Ukraine$38k · 1 grant
Taiwan$36k · 4 grants
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving. International giving is mapped by the recipient’s country from the same 990 filings; comparable need data isn’t available at that grain.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

57%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$4.0M · 40 repeat orgs$3.1M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +47% since the first grant, against +27% for those funded once.

40 repeat relationships: 2 still active in FY2025, 38 since wound down; 21 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

40
196

Total granted

$4.0M
$2.7M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+47%
+27%

Still filing today

70%
56%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 6% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $387k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesReligionHealthHousing & ShelterInternationalCrime & LegalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • LA
    LIVE ACTION
    2× · 2021–2022 · $861k · revenue +9%
  • JA
    JONI AND FRIENDS
    4× · 2020–2023 · $500k · revenue +73%
  • CM
    CHAMPION MINISTRIES INC
    3× · 2020–2022 · $424k · revenue +65%

Funded once

  • PH
    PROJECT HOOD COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION
    one grant, 2022 · $250k · revenue -51%
  • TG
    TrustBridge Global
    one grant, 2020 · $150k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2020 · $120k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
His Helping Hands Ministries

Provide safe housing and training to women who were victims of addiction,sex trafficking, abuse, homelesness or previously incarcerated.

Religion
2
Sower of Seeds International Ministries

SOS provides assistance to poor and marginalized people in the USA & other countries. SOS feeds the hungry, drills water wells, contributes to schools and operates an orphanage. SOS also rescues and rehabilitates victims of sex trafficking.

Religion
3
The Orphans Hands Inc

The Orphan's Hands provides a safe home and education for orphaned youth at risk of being trafficked in high-risk countries while bringing the love and hope of Jesus.

International
4
Misfit Mission

Misfits Mission purpose is to lead women to restoration in Christ through transitional living and godly counsel of Christian leaders.

Health
5
Alive At Last

Alive at Last helps victims of sexual exploitation and trafficking live free and discover their God-given purpose.

Crime & Legal
6
Freedom That Lasts Ministries

Ftlm seeks to equip churches to minister to those who are suffering from addiction and equip christians with the resources needed to facilitate spiritual growth in christlike character and biblical wisdom.

Human Services
7
Daughters of Hope Refuge Inc

Providing transitional housing and quality restorative services that move women and their children to lives of stability independence and new life.

Human Services
8
New Road Missions

We are compelled by god's word to provide security, education and the hope of jesus to children in south africa so they can thrive personally and impact their future families, communities and the kingdom of god.

Religion
9
Refuge for Women Inc

Refuge for women inc is a faith-based organization that provides housing, counseling, and life and work skills training for women who have escaped human trafficking or sexual exploitation.

Housing & Shelter
10
Freedom House Ministries

House of Hope Kansas City is unique, because we work with teens and their parents to find solutions and ultimately, restoration of healthy family relationships. We serve families in crisis with our program for residents to experience the…

Education
11
House of Hope International

See schedule oour mission is the integration of women and children into society, transformed through the power of healing and complete discipleship and vocational training within a safe, loving, and serving community. our vision is to see…

Public Safety & Disaster
12
Fresh Start Ministries of San Angelo

We aim to assist hurting women that demonstrate the desire for a life change with a helping hand up, not a hand out, through a biblically-based, Christ-centered, mentoring and discipleship program. In order to facilitate life-long change,…

Housing & Shelter
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Sheepfold Inc; the most unlike its peers is Dean-o and the Dynamos Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

148 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 148 of the 261 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
40
Early backer (in before they grew)
144/148
Grantees still filing
104/148
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

JONI AND FRIENDS: $500,000 · OtherJONI AND FRIENDSTrustBridge Global: $150,000 · OtherFOR THE CHILDREN: $160,000 · Other+155 more: $3,292,340 · Other+155 moreLIVE ACTION: $861,300 · Civil RightsLIVE ACTIONOBRIA MEDICAL CLINICS OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA INC: $125,000 · Civil RightsOBRIA MEDICAL C…+1 more: $1,500 · Civil RightsPrecept: $110,000 · ReligionPreceptBRAVE GLOBAL: $100,000 · ReligionBRAVE GLOB…EQUIPNET: $100,000 · ReligionEQUIPNETUNCHARTED MINISTRIES: $50,000 · ReligionUNCHARTED …GREATER EUROPE MISSION: $50,000 · ReligionGREATER EU…PASS IT ON MINISTRY: $50,000 · ReligionPASS IT ON…GLOBAL MISSION: $35,000 · ReligionNORTH COUNTY PROJECT: $27,000 · Religion+13 more: $150,660 · Religion+13 moreLIFESONG FOR ORPHANS INC: $169,000 · InternationalONE GENERATION ALLIANCE INC: $123,750 · InternationalFAMILIES SET FREE INC: $50,000 · InternationalASIA HARVEST INC: $45,000 · InternationalCROSSING BOUNDARIES INC: $40,124 · International+4 more: $13,629 · InternationalCHAMPION MINISTRIES INC: $424,350 · Youth Development+2 more: $17,000 · Youth DevelopmentThe Network Group Inc: $182,000 · Crime & LegalADVOCATES FOR FAITH AND FREEDOM: $120,000 · Crime & Legal+1 more: $3,288 · Crime & LegalPROJECT HOOD COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION: $250,000 · Community ImprovementWarriors of Hope: $10,000 · Community Improvement+1 more: $1,000 · Community Improvement
Other$4,102,340Civil Rights$987,800Religion$672,660International$441,503Youth Development$441,350Crime & Legal$305,288Community Improvement$261,000

Showing the 200 largest grantees by grant value.

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetLIVE ACTION: $861,300 over 2y, 3.9% of budgetJONI AND FRIENDS: $500,000 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetCHAMPION MINISTRIES INC: $424,350 over 3y, 8.8% of budgetPROJECT HOOD COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION: $250,000 over 1y, 1.7% of budgetThe Network Group Inc: $182,000 over 2y, 4.0% of budgetLIFESONG FOR ORPHANS INC: $169,000 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetFOR THE CHILDREN: $160,000 over 4y, 3.1% of budgetOBRIA MEDICAL CLINICS OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA INC: $125,000 over 2y, 11% of budgetONE GENERATION ALLIANCE INC: $123,750 over 4y, 7.6% of budgetADVOCATES FOR FAITH AND FREEDOM: $120,000 over 2y, 13% of budgetOC UNITED TOGETHER: $114,050 over 3y, 4.6% of budgetPrecept: $110,000 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetBRAVE GLOBAL: $100,000 over 2y, 36% of budgetEQUIPNET: $100,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetHOPEWELL FUND: $100,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetAGUA VIVA MINISTRIES: $82,850 over 4y, 5.5% of budgetSTEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION: $80,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHitching Post Ministries: $65,000 over 4y, 13% of budgetSurf and Turf Therapy: $53,000 over 5y, 3.7% of budgetUNCHARTED MINISTRIES: $50,000 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetDISCOVERY INSTITUTE: $50,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetPASS IT ON MINISTRY: $50,000 over 1y, 14% of budgetCAMP FREEDOM INC: $50,000 over 1y, 3.3% of budgetFAMILIES SET FREE INC: $50,000 over 1y, 4.7% of budgetASIA HARVEST INC: $45,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetFREE WHEELCHAIR MISSION: $45,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetCROSSING BOUNDARIES INC: $40,124 over 1y, 8.3% of budgetAbundant Life Ranch Inc: $40,000 over 3y, 6.2% of budgetGLOBAL MISSION: $35,000 over 2y, 2.4% of budgetNEW DAY FOR CHILDREN: $30,000 over 1y, 4.3% of budgetNORTH COUNTY PROJECT: $27,000 over 3y, 4.7% of budgetGATEWAYS TO BETTER EDUCATION: $25,000 over 1y, 4.1% of budgetAnd Then There Were None: $25,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetNEAR EAST ORGANIZATION INC: $21,960 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetMYAGRO FARMS: $20,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetALTERNATIVES FOR GIRLS: $20,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetRED BIRD MISSION INC: $20,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetDean-o and the Dynamos Inc: $20,000 over 2y, 10% of budgetBEHOLD ISRAEL: $20,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetIBEROAMERICAN MINISTRIES: $16,200 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetPERMANECER MINISTRIES INC: $15,100 over 2y, 3.2% of budgetAWAKEN THE DAWN INC: $15,000 over 1y, 1.9% of budgetREWRITTEN: $11,000 over 2y, 4.5% of budgetILLUMINATE COMMUNITY RECOVERY SERVI: $10,000 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetFaithquest Missions: $10,000 over 1y, 3.9% of budgetLIVINGWELL PREGNANCY CENTERS: $10,000 over 1y, 3.2% of budgetIMPACT LIVING SERVICES: $10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetOLIVE TREE MINISTRIES: $10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds LIVE ACTION ↗
  • Who funds JONI AND FRIENDS ↗
  • Who funds CHAMPION MINISTRIES INC ↗
  • Who funds PROJECT HOOD COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds The Network Group Inc ↗
  • Who funds LIFESONG FOR ORPHANS INC ↗
  • Who funds FOR THE CHILDREN ↗
  • Who funds OBRIA MEDICAL CLINICS OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA INC ↗
  • Who funds ONE GENERATION ALLIANCE INC ↗
  • Who funds ADVOCATES FOR FAITH AND FREEDOM ↗
  • Who funds OC UNITED TOGETHER ↗
  • Who funds Precept ↗
  • Who funds BRAVE GLOBAL ↗
  • Who funds EQUIPNET ↗
  • Who funds HOPEWELL FUND ↗
  • Who funds AGUA VIVA MINISTRIES ↗
  • Who funds STEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Hitching Post Ministries ↗
  • Who funds Surf and Turf Therapy ↗
  • Who funds UNCHARTED MINISTRIES ↗
  • Who funds DISCOVERY INSTITUTE ↗
  • Who funds GREATER EUROPE MISSION ↗
  • Who funds PASS IT ON MINISTRY ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Orange County Community FoundationCA34.1× affinity22 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Orange County Community Foundation · Christian Community Foundation Inc · Sisters of St Joseph Healthcare Foundation · Servant Foundation · Inland Empire Community Foundation · Optivest Foundation · Hoag Memorial Hospital Presbyterian · In-N-Out Burgers Foundation · Edwards Lifesciences Foundation · Sempra Foundation · Liferay Foundation · O L Halsell Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Giving University funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Giving University. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%3%10%23%40%funder's share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government →median 5%
  • Adelante Mujeres: 31% of income from government
  • The Contingent: 5% of income from government
  • Community Rowing Inc: 2% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
37report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Giving University?

Find your warmest path to Giving University through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 261 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Giving University’s filings →

More from the funding graph