Skip to content
Give2asia at a glanceMostly funded, not a grantmaker: see who funds it →

· Public charity

Give2asia

GIVE2ASIA provides philanthropic services to individuals, foundations, corporations and charitable organizations in the united states and asia.

$42M
Granted FY2023
8
Grants FY2023
6
States reached
$839k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead

Read this first · the figures below need context

96% of Give2asia’s FY2024 grant dollars went to Myriad Usa Inc, not to grantees.

Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2024 names 4 organizations directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it. Everything below is therefore FY2023, the last year Give2asia named its own grantees at scale: 7 organizations, $3M. It is dated, not current.

Organizations named directly on the return

9
’21
7
’22
7
’23
4
’24

Amber years are those where most dollars went to a sponsor.

01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2021 to 2024.

International$8.0MEducation$2.1MPublic Safety & Disaster$476kScience & Tech$227kCommunity Improvement$170kHuman Services$63kSocial Science$59kCivil Rights$47kOther$0
02FY2023 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 8 grants below total $2,638,359, the rows itemized in this filing. The $42,299,290 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $39,660,931 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2023

  • $10k–50k1 grant · $47k
  • $50k–250k3 grants · $290k
  • $250k+4 grants · $2.3M
$300,000
Median grant
6
States reached
$30M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
PROJECT HOPE THE PEOPLE-TO-PEOPLE HEALTH FOUNDATION INC$838,995
MYRIAD USA$722,339
JUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT WORLDWIDE$439,438
AMAL ACADEMY$300,000
SHIMMY TECHNOLOGIES GROUP INC$127,000
INTERNATIONAL INSTITUTE OF RURAL RECONSTRUCTION$100,000
THE NUDGE FOUNDATION$63,450
BLUE DRAGON CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION USA$47,137
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–21, $63k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%ONE HEART WORLDWIDE: $63k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

NY
MA
CA
CO
AZ
DC
GA
TX

Grants abroad, by region: $29M on the FY2024 return

Schedule F, as filed: 5 regions. The IRS asks for region and purpose, not the recipient, so no country or grantee can be named here.

East Asia and the Pacific$27M · 93% · 214 grants

Stated purpose: EDUCATION · HUMAN RIGHTS · LIVELIHOOD

South Asia$1.7M · 6% · 28 grants

Stated purpose: WOMEN & GIRLS · EDUCATION · SOCIAL SERVICES

Europe (including Iceland and Greenland)$119k · 0% · 4 grants

Stated purpose: EDUCATION · DISASTER RESPONSE

North America (Canada and Mexico)$102k · 0% · 2 grants

Stated purpose: LIVELIHOOD · EDUCATION

Middle East and North Africa$77k · 0% · 1 grant

Stated purpose: HEALTH

How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving. Grants abroad on Schedule F are filed by region, purpose and amount with no recipient name, so they are shown by region and cannot be placed on the country map or matched to a grantee.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

70%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$4.5M · 6 repeat orgs$1.9M to everyone else

6 repeat relationships: 6 still active in FY2023, 0 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2023 (too recent to call). Read against FY2023, the last year this funder named its own grantees directly; its giving has since run through a sponsor, which reports no donor behind each grant.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

6
8

Total granted

$4.5M
$1.3M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

-29%
-5%

Still filing today

83%
88%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 0% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $156k went to new ones.

50%100%’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’21’22’23’24
InternationalEducationEmploymentHuman ServicesPublic Safety & DisasterSocial ScienceOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • PROJECT HOPE - THE PEOPLE-TO-PEOPLE HEALTH FOUNDATION INC
    3× · 2021–2023 · $1.7M · revenue +41%
  • AA
    AMAL ACADEMY INC
    3× · 2021–2023 · $1.5M · revenue -84% · 100% of their budget
  • TN
    The Nudge Foundation
    2× · 2021–2023 · $813k · revenue -29%

Funded once

  • COOPERATIVE FOR ASSISTANCE AND RELIEF EVERYWHERE INC
    one grant, 2021 · $605k · revenue +12%
  • BF
    BANKABLE FRONTIER ASSOCIATES LLC
    one grant, 2022 · $170k
  • TA
    THE ASIA FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2021 · $135k · revenue -5%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
International Development Enterprises

See schedule o for a more detailed description of ide's mission statement and achievements.

International
2
International Center for Research On Women

The international center for research for women (icrw) is a global research institute, with a mission to advance rights and opportunities for women, girls, and structurally excluded populations with actionable evidence and solutions.

International
3
Ja Africa

The mission of ja africa is to inspire and prepare young people in africa to succeed in a global economy.

Education
4
Direct Action for Women Now World-Wide Inc Formerly Indias Daughters Inc
Philanthropy
5
Pan American Development Foundation

The pan american development foundation (padf) saves lives, promotes economic growth, and advances security and rule of law. through partnerships and innovation, we enable people across the americas to prosper with dignity and respect,…

International
6
International Consortium of Investigative Journalists Inc

International consortium of investigative journalists, inc.'s (icij) mission is to show people how the world really works through stories that rock the world; forcing positive change.

International
7
Annapurna Global Foundation
Philanthropy
8
Asociacion Interamericana Para La Defensa Del Ambiente

To strenghten people's ability to guarantee their individual and collective right to a healthy environment, via the development, implementation, and effective enforcement of national and international law.

Crime & Legal
9
Upaya Social Ventures

Upaya Social Ventures' mission is to create dignified jobs for people living in extreme poverty by building scalable businesses with investment and consulting support.

International
10
Global Voice
—
11
Pathfinder International

Pathfinder expands access to sexual and reproductive health services, opening the door to opportunities for women and all individuals to thrive-economically, educationally, and civically. driven by our country-led leadership and local…

International
12
International Aids Vaccine Initiative Inc

A global nonprofit biomedical research organization that develops vaccines and antibodies for hiv, tuberculosis, and emerging infectious diseases.

International
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Ja Worldwide Inc; the most unlike its peers is Amal Academy Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

18 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 18 of the 21 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
18/18
Grantees still filing
8/18
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

MYRIAD USA INC: $4,632,514 · InternationalMYRIAD USA INCPROJECT HOPE - THE PEOPLE-TO-PEOPLE HEALTH FOUNDATION INC: $1,673,598 · InternationalPROJECT HOPE - THE PEOPLE-TO-PEOPLE HEALTH FOUNDATION INCThe Nudge Foundation: $813,450 · InternationalThe Nudge FoundationCOOPERATIVE FOR ASSISTANCE AND RELIEF EVERYWHERE INC: $605,000 · InternationalCOOPERATIVE FOR ASSISTANCE AND RELIEF EVERYWHERE INC+4 more: $568,700 · International+4 moreAMAL ACADEMY INC: $1,500,000 · EmploymentAMAL ACADEMY IN…JA WORLDWIDE INC: $439,438 · EducationINTRAX FOUNDATION: $98,664 · EducationROOM TO READ: $19,000 · EducationSHIMMY TECHNOLOGIES INC: $227,000 · OtherBANKABLE FRONTIER ASSOCIATES LLC: $169,532 · OtherTRICKLE UP PROGRAM INC: $50,000 · OtherASIAN PACIFIC FUND: $46,500 · OtherBETHANY BEYOND THE JORDAN BAPTISM SITE FOUNDATION: $23,750 · Other+1 more: $14,211 · OtherAIP FOUNDATION INC: $130,000 · Public Safety & DisasterONE HEART WORLDWIDE: $63,000 · Human ServicesACTIONAID USA: $59,196 · Social Science
International$8,293,262Employment$1,500,000Education$557,102Other$530,993Public Safety & Disaster$130,000Human Services$63,000Social Science$59,196

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetMYRIAD USA INC: $4,632,514 over 3y, 1.7% of budgetPROJECT HOPE - THE PEOPLE-TO-PEOPLE HEALTH FOUNDATION INC: $1,673,598 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetAMAL ACADEMY INC: $1,500,000 over 3y, 100% of budgetThe Nudge Foundation: $813,450 over 2y, 9.0% of budgetCOOPERATIVE FOR ASSISTANCE AND RELIEF EVERYWHERE INC: $605,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetJA WORLDWIDE INC: $439,438 over 1y, 1.7% of budgetBLUE DRAGON CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION USA: $166,186 over 2y, 8.8% of budgetInternational Institute of Rural Reconstruction: $135,347 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetTHE ASIA FOUNDATION: $135,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetPacific Links Foundation: $132,167 over 1y, 4.3% of budgetAIP FOUNDATION INC: $130,000 over 1y, 4.6% of budgetINTRAX FOUNDATION: $98,664 over 1y, 20% of budgetONE HEART WORLDWIDE: $63,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetACTIONAID USA: $59,196 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetTRICKLE UP PROGRAM INC: $50,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetASIAN PACIFIC FUND: $46,500 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetBETHANY BEYOND THE JORDAN BAPTISM SITE FOUNDATION: $23,750 over 1y, 96% of budgetROOM TO READ: $19,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Silicon Valley Commun…The Rockefeller Found…Rockefeller Philanthr…Tides FoundationThe Goldman Sachs Cha…The San Francisco Fou…Charities Aid Foundat…Jpmorgan Chase Founda…American Endowment Fo…The Blackbaud Giving …Vanguard Charitable E…Morgan Stanley Global…
Silicon Valley Community FoundationCA15.4× affinity7 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Silicon Valley Community Foundation · The Rockefeller Foundation · Rockefeller Philanthropy Advisors Inc · Tides Foundation · The Goldman Sachs Charitable Gift Fund · The San Francisco Foundation · Charities Aid Foundation America · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · American Endowment Foundation · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Give2asia funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Give2asia. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Give2asia?

    Find your warmest path to Give2asia through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 21 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2023, released 2023. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Give2asia’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home