Skip to content

California · Public charity

Girl Scouts of Greater Los Angeles

Girl scouts' mission is to build girls of courage, confidence, and character, who make the world a better place. GIRL SCOUTS OF GREATER LOS ANGELES ("gsgla the "council "girl scouts"), the largest girl-serving nonprofit in southern california, fulfills this mission by providing one-of-a-kind access to programs in entrepreneurship, life…

$955k
Granted FY2025(still arriving)
Read the full brief
Total assets, FY2025
$60M

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Feed the Children IncOK13.2× affinity4 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Feed the Children Inc · California Community Foundation · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Compare Girl Scouts of Greater Los Angeles with peer funders

About Girl Scouts of Greater Los Angeles

How much does Girl Scouts of Greater Los Angeles give?
Girl Scouts of Greater Los Angeles reported $954,602 in grants in its FY2025 IRS filing. Individual grant detail isn't itemized in the e-filed return we have. It is referenced on an attached schedule, or the latest filing isn't in our corpus yet.
Which funders back the same organizations as Girl Scouts of Greater Los Angeles?
Its strongest co-funders, measured against what their size predicts, include Feed the Children Inc, California Community Foundation, Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund.
Where is Girl Scouts of Greater Los Angeles based?
Girl Scouts of Greater Los Angeles is based in CA.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph