· Private foundation
Gilmore Sanitarium Inc Gilmore Foundation Inc
Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).
A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 76% of GILMORE SANITARIUM INC GILMORE FOUNDATION INC’s grantee dollars fall outside its nine largest cause areas, whether because the recipient carries no IRS cause code or because its cause sits in the long tail. A chart would be mostly one residual band and misrepresent the portfolio.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k5 grants · $10k
- $10k–50k6 grants · $115k
- $50k–250k4 grants · $375k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| HEALTH CARE FOUNDATION OF NORTH MS | $100,416 |
| MONROE COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOLS | $100,000 |
| AMORY PUBLIC SCHOOLS | $100,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $75,000 |
| QEF | $30,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $25,000 |
| AMORY FOOD PANTRY | $25,000 |
| CREATE FOUNDATION | $15,000 |
| AMORY KIWANIS CLUB | $10,000 |
| CREATE FOUNDATION | $10,000 |
| AMORY HUMANE SOCIETY | $5,000 |
| ITAWAMBA COMMUNITY COLLEGE | $3,000 |
| AMORY RAILROAD FESTIVAL | $1,000 |
| AMORY GLOBAL METHODIST CHURCH | $500 |
| ABUNDANT LIFE ACTIVITY CENTER | $500 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $140k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 15%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +58% since the first grant, against -15% for the ones you funded once.
24 repeat relationships — 9 still active in FY2025, 15 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 78% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $105k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- APAMORY PUBLIC SCHOOLS5× · 2021–2025 · $778k
- IGIndividual grant recipient6× · 2020–2025 · $246k
- HCHEALTH CARE FOUNDATION OF NORTH MS2× · 2024–2025 · $200k · revenue 0%
Funded once
- EDEIGHT DAYS OF HOPE INCone grant, 2024 · $200k · revenue -20%
- GGELIone grant, 2017 · $79k
- IICCone grant, 2022 · $60k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The rescue missions purpose is to provide food, housing , and transportation in emergency situations to local residents and transients, Those served are spiritually ministered.
To minister to the emergency food needs of the residents of aberdeen and south monroe county, ms and promote awareness of human needs around us.
Food distribution to the needy
The marion county humane society was established for the purpose of providing temporary care and housing of stray or homeless dogs and cats, to assist in the return of lost dogs and cats to their owners, to provide a means of finding new…
The remnant house, located in lee county, mississippi provides men and women with a faith-based christian transitional living home and recovery program. our christ-centered one year transitional living recovery program allows an individual…
To promote the common interest of those involved in the development & management of rural multi-family housing.
Fishing community advocacy
Preserve the history of shelby county al
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Amory Food Pantry Inc and the most unlike its peers is Lake Stephens United Methodist Camp. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 46 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds HEALTH CARE FOUNDATION OF NORTH MS ↗
- Who funds EIGHT DAYS OF HOPE INC ↗
- Who funds AMORY FOOD PANTRY INC ↗
- Who funds CREATE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds THREE RIVERS PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT ↗
- Who funds AMORY HUMANE SOCIETY ↗
- Who funds LAKE STEPHENS UNITED METHODIST CAMP ↗
- Who funds AMORY RAILROAD FESTIVAL ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Gilmore Sanitarium Inc Gilmore Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Gilmore Sanitarium Inc Gilmore Foundation Inc?
Find your warmest path to Gilmore Sanitarium Inc Gilmore Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.