Skip to content
Giles Family Foundation at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Private foundation

Giles Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$10k
Granted FY2025still arriving
3
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$5k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Health$50kReligion$8kEducation$5kArts & Culture$5kInternational$4kYouth Development$2kHuman Services$2kAnimals$2k
02FY2025 · 3 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$4,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$16k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
NORTH PALM YOUTH SYMPHONY$5,000
DAVID'S DREAM AND BELEIVE CANCER FOUNDATION$4,000
OAKS INTEGRATED CARE$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–17, $3k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 7%FRIENDS OF KIDS WITH CANCER: $3k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MA
PA
NJ
CO
MO
TN
GA
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

46%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$36k · 4 repeat orgs$42k to everyone else

4 repeat relationships: 2 still active in FY2025, 2 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

4
14

Total granted

$36k
$37k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+9%
+48%

Still filing today

50%
64%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 50% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $5k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’24’25
HealthHuman ServicesYouth DevelopmentArts & CultureEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • OI
    OAKS INTEGRATED CARE INC
    6× · 2017–2025 · $14k · revenue +9%
  • DD
    DAVIDS DREAM AND BELIEVE CANCER FOUNDATION INC
    3× · 2022–2025 · $11k · revenue -24%
  • SM
    ST MARY'S PARISH
    4× · 2019–2022 · $7k

Funded once

  • MH
    MARISOL HEALTH INC
    one grant, 2020 · $5k · revenue -64%
  • SH
    SOPHIE'S HOPE FOUNDATION INCgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $5k · revenue +39%
  • RM
    ROCKY MOUNTAIN CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL
    one grant, 2018 · $5k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Childrens Cancer Therapy Development Institute

To make all childhood cancers universally survivable by delivering new treatments to clinical trials through scientific discovery.

—
2
Bradens Hope for Childhood Cancer Inc

Raise awareness, fund research grants to find treatments and cure childhood cancer

Health
3
Children's Hospital Corporation

Provider of pediatric healthcare, education, research & community service

Health
4
Arms Wide Open Childhood Cancer Foundation

Arms wide open childhood cancer foundation is committed to funding pediatric cancer research, supporting families who are suffering hardship due to their child's cancer diagnosis both financially and emotionally, educating the general…

Health
5
Aidan's Avengers

The primary mission of the organization is to raise awareness and funding for research programs that focus on childhood brain cancers and to provide financial peace of mind for families affected by childhood brain cancer.

Health
6
CancerFree Kids

CancerFree KIDS exists to raise awareness of the need for more funding for pediatric cancer research and to raise funds that are invested in early stage, potentially game-changing research focused on gentler treatments and cures for…

Health
7
Cure Childhood Cancer Inc

To advance treatments and ultimately find cures for cancers which affect children, working to ensure children have the best chance to survive their cancer without sacrificing their future health and quality of life, to support the hands-on…

Health
8
Supporting Kids Foundation

Supporting Kids Foundation provides immediate financial assistance to families in the greater Kansas City area who have a child diagnosed with pediatric cancer.

Human Services
9
Oncology and Kids Inc

To help kids and families heal the emotional scars of childhood cancer and learn to thrive.

Human Services
10
Sam Day Foundation

The sam day foundation advances research for childhood and young adult cancers and facilitates wellness-centered support and experiences so kids with cancer can survive and live well.

Food & Nutrition
11
Children's Cancer Family Foundation of Ne Wi Inc

Raise money to support families and children suffering from childhood cancer.

Health
12
Care Camps Foundation

Care camps funds medically supervised pediatric oncology camps across the united states and canada to bring the healing power of community and the outdoors to children living with cancer and their families.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Denver Children's Home; the most unlike its peers is North Palm Youth Symphony Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 19 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
12/12
Grantees still filing
8/12
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

OAKS INTEGRATED CARE INC: $14,000 · HealthOAKS INTEGRATED CARE INCDAVIDS DREAM AND BELIEVE CANCER FOUNDATION INC: $10,500 · HealthDAVIDS DREAM AND BELIEVE CANCER FOUNDATION INCSOPHIE'S HOPE FOUNDATION INC: $5,000 · HealthSOPHIE'S HOPE FOUNDATION INCDENVER CHILDREN'S HOME: $3,000 · HealthDENVER CHILDREN'S HOMEST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $1,500 · Health+1 more: $1,000 · HealthST MARY'S PARISH: $7,000 · OtherST MARY'S PARISHMARISOL HEALTH INC: $5,000 · OtherMARISOL HEALTH INCROCKY MOUNTAIN CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL: $5,000 · OtherROCKY MOUNTAIN CHILDREN'S HOSPITALSUNSHINE GIRL CHARITIES INC: $4,000 · OtherSUNSHINE GIRL CHARITIES INCCHILDRENS HEALTHCARE OF ATLANTA: $2,500 · OtherCHILDRENS HEALTHCARE OF ATLANTAASSOC HUMANE SOCIRTY: $1,500 · OtherASSOC HUMANE SOCIRTYTHE VILLAGE: $1,000 · Other+1 more: $500 · OtherNorth Palm Youth Symphony Inc: $5,000 · Arts & CultureThe Pine School Inc: $5,000 · EducationFRIENDS OF KIDS WITH CANCER: $2,500 · Human ServicesOperation Warm Inc: $1,000 · Human ServicesART FROM ASHES INCORPORATED: $2,000 · Youth Development
Health$35,000Other$26,500Arts & Culture$5,000Education$5,000Human Services$3,500Youth Development$2,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetOAKS INTEGRATED CARE INC: $14,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetDAVIDS DREAM AND BELIEVE CANCER FOUNDATION INC: $10,500 over 3y, 0.8% of budgetSOPHIE'S HOPE FOUNDATION INC: $5,000 over 1y, 2.0% of budgetNorth Palm Youth Symphony Inc: $5,000 over 1y, 3.0% of budgetThe Pine School Inc: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDENVER CHILDREN'S HOME: $3,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetFRIENDS OF KIDS WITH CANCER: $2,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetART FROM ASHES INCORPORATED: $2,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetOperation Warm Inc: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHUGS FOR BRADY FOUNDATION: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Bank of America C…The Pfizer Foundation…The Blackbaud Giving …Charities Aid Foundat…American Online Givin…Donor Advised Charita…Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
The Bank of America Charitable Foundation IncNC10× affinity7 shared granteesties to 7 of 7Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Charities Aid Foundation America · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Giles Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Giles Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 30%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%15%30%45%60%share of the org’s income from government →median 31%
  • Oaks Integrated Care Inc: 31% of income from government
  • The Pine School Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
3get no government money at all
1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–60%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Giles Family Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Giles Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 19 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Giles Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home