Skip to content

· Private foundation

Gilbert Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$26k
Granted FY2025still arriving
14
Grants FY2025still arriving
6
States reached
$6k
Largest
01What it funds
0172% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2025.

International$133kHealth$31kEducation$16kReligion$12kHuman Services$10kArts & Culture$8kRecreation & Sports$7kFood & Nutrition$5kOther$0
02FY2025 · 14 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$1,000
Median grant
6
States reached
$397k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CHOP FOUNDATION$6,000
Individual grant recipient$5,000
SPRINGFIELD HS DE CO SAEF$4,500
JUVENILE DIABETES RESEARCH FUND$1,500
FEEDING AMERICA$1,500
ABRAMSON SENIOR CARE$1,000
DOCTORS WITHOUT BORDERS$1,000
BREAST CANCERORG$1,000
US HOLOCAUST MUSEUM$1,000
CCF$1,000
AMERICAN WIDOW PROJECT$500
EMILYS ENTORAGE$500
Individual grant recipient$500
HARMONY PROJECT$500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–25, $12k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 9% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%AMERICAN WIDOW PROJECT: $1k → 10%AMERICAN WIDOW PROJECT: $500 → 10%AMERICAN WIDOW PROJECT: $500 → 10%AMERICAN WIDOW PROJECT: $500 → 10%AMERICAN WIDOW PROJECT: $500 → 10%THE JERRY SEGAL CLASSIC: $1k → 22%JEWISH RELIEF AGENCY: $500 → 7%THE JERRY SEGAL CLASSIC: $7k → 7%AMERICAN FRIENDS OF ELI: $500 → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
NY
IA
PA
NJ
CA
CO
DC
AL
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

78%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$144k · 22 repeat orgs$42k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +13% since the first grant, against -12% for those funded once.

22 repeat relationships: 12 still active in FY2025, 10 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

22
21

Total granted

$144k
$36k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+13%
-12%

Still filing today

36%
29%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 76% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $6k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesHealthEducationInternationalPhilanthropyArts & CultureOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CC
    CROHN'S & COLITIS FOUNDATION INC
    4× · 2019–2024 · $7k · revenue +15%
  • B
    BREASTCANCERORG
    5× · 2020–2025 · $5k · revenue +158%
  • TU
    The United States Holocaust Memorial Museum
    4× · 2019–2025 · $4k · revenue +21%

Funded once

  • JC
    JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER KAISERMAN
    one grant, 2019 · $5k
  • SF
    Starfinder Foundation
    one grant, 2019 · $5k · revenue -54%
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2021 · $5k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Steinhardt Foundation for Jewish Life Inc
Religion
2
Us Middle East Project Inc

The organization's mission is to engage in non partisan analysis of u.s. foreign policy in the middle east, with special emphasis on the middle east peace process, and to present policymakers in the united states, in the region and in the…

International
3
Jewish United Fund of Metropolitan Chicago

Juf provides critical resources that bring food, refuge, health care, education and emergency assistance to over 500,000 chicagoans of all faiths and millions of jews in israel and around the world, funding a network of 100+ agencies,…

Philanthropy
4
The Jewish Federations of North America Inc

The federation movement protects and enhances the well-being of jews worldwide through the values of tikkun olam (repairing the world), tzedakah (charity and social justice) and torah (jewish learning). the jewish federations of north…

Philanthropy
5
Jewish Federation of Southern Arizona

Jewish philanthropies of southern arizona (jpsa) is committed to achieving the full potential of jewish philanthropy, now and for future generations. comprised of jewish federation of southern arizona (jfsa or federation) and jewish…

Philanthropy
6
Evan Joseph Gerstein Foundation
Health
7
Joseph and Malka Melohn Foundation
—
8
Physicians for Palestine
Health
9
Idf Memorial Foundation
Philanthropy
10
The Keren Rachaim Fund
—
11
Impact Forum Foundation

The Impact Forum is an exclusive network of philanthropists. We are connecting philanthropists that support each others initiatives and collaborate to empower and meet with exceptional non-profit organizations to fight antisemitism,…

Philanthropy
12
Jewish Federation of Metropolitan Chicago

Federation amplifies our collective strength to make the world a better place for everyone. we assist people in need, impact chicagoans of all faiths; support israel and the jewish people worldwide; respond swiftly to crises; cultivate…

Philanthropy
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Pef Israel Endowment Funds Inc; the most unlike its peers is Love to Langa. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

18 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 18 of the 48 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
17/18
Grantees still filing
11/18
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CHOP FOUNDATION: $36,000 · OtherCHOP FOUNDATIONIndividual grant recipient: $15,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientIndividual grant recipient: $13,700 · OtherIndividual grant recipientJUVENILE DIABETES RESEARCH FUND: $10,000 · OtherJUVENILE DIABETES RESEARCH FUNDSTDANIEL'S UNITED METHODIST CHURCH: $9,000 · OtherSTDANIEL'S UNITED METHODIST CHURCHSPRINGFIELD HS DE CO SAEF: $8,000 · OtherSPRINGFIELD HS DE CO SAEFJEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER KAISERMAN: $5,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $5,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $5,000 · Other+23 more: $36,500 · Other+23 morePEF ISRAEL ENDOWMENT FUNDS INC: $122,000 · PhilanthropyPEF ISRAEL ENDOWMENT FUNDS INCJEWISH FEDERATION OF GREATER PHILADELPHIA: $5,000 · PhilanthropyStarfinder Foundation: $5,000 · PhilanthropyCROHN'S & COLITIS FOUNDATION INC: $7,000 · HealthBREASTCANCERORG: $5,000 · HealthCystic Fibrosis Research Fund Inc: $1,000 · HealthTHE JERRY SEGAL CLASSIC: $7,500 · Human ServicesTHE AMERICAN WIDOW PROJECT: $3,000 · Human ServicesJEWISH RELIEF AGENCY: $500 · Human ServicesELI-AMERICAN FRIENDS OF THE ISRAEL ASSOCIATION FOR CHILD PROTECTION: $500 · Human ServicesJEWISH NATIONAL FUND (KEREN KAYEMETH LEISRAEL) INC: $6,000 · InternationalMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $3,500 · InternationalLove to Langa: $500 · InternationalHarmony Project: $3,500 · EducationSPRINGFIELD AREA EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $1,000 · EducationThe United States Holocaust Memorial Museum: $4,000 · Arts & Culture
Other$143,200Philanthropy$132,000Health$13,000Human Services$11,500International$10,000Education$4,500Arts & Culture$4,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetPEF ISRAEL ENDOWMENT FUNDS INC: $122,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetTHE JERRY SEGAL CLASSIC: $7,500 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetCROHN'S & COLITIS FOUNDATION INC: $7,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetJEWISH NATIONAL FUND (KEREN KAYEMETH LEISRAEL) INC: $6,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetJEWISH FEDERATION OF GREATER PHILADELPHIA: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetStarfinder Foundation: $5,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetBREASTCANCERORG: $5,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetThe United States Holocaust Memorial Museum: $4,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetHarmony Project: $3,500 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $3,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetFeeding America: $3,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSPRINGFIELD AREA EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $1,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetCystic Fibrosis Research Fund Inc: $1,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJEWISH RELIEF AGENCY: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLove to Langa: $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetELI-AMERICAN FRIENDS OF THE ISRAEL ASSOCIATION FOR CHILD PROTECTION: $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds PEF ISRAEL ENDOWMENT FUNDS INC ↗
  • Who funds THE JERRY SEGAL CLASSIC ↗
  • Who funds CROHN'S & COLITIS FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds JEWISH NATIONAL FUND (KEREN KAYEMETH LEISRAEL) INC ↗
  • Who funds JEWISH FEDERATION OF GREATER PHILADELPHIA ↗
  • Who funds Starfinder Foundation ↗
  • Who funds BREASTCANCERORG ↗
  • Who funds The United States Holocaust Memorial Museum ↗
  • Who funds Harmony Project ↗
  • Who funds MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC ↗
  • Who funds Feeding America ↗
  • Who funds THE AMERICAN WIDOW PROJECT ↗
  • Who funds SPRINGFIELD AREA EDUCATION FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Cystic Fibrosis Research Fund Inc ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Paypal Charitable Giving FundDC8.7× affinity4 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Paypal Charitable Giving Fund · Network for Good · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Gilbert Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Gilbert Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Gilbert Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Gilbert Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 48 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Gilbert’s filings →

    More from the funding graph