· Private foundation
Gilbert & Thyra Plass Charitable Trust
Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).
A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 42% of GILBERT & THYRA PLASS CHARITABLE TRUST’s grantee dollars fall outside its nine largest cause areas, whether because the recipient carries no IRS cause code or because its cause sits in the long tail. A chart would be mostly one residual band and misrepresent the portfolio.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k21 grants · $104k
- $10k–50k1 grant · $10k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| BRAZOS VALLEY FOOD BANK INC | $10,000 |
| TWIN CITY MISSION | $7,000 |
| HOSPICE BRAZOS VALLEY INC | $7,000 |
| HEALTH FOR ALL CLINIC INC | $7,000 |
| ST ANDREW'S EPISCOPAL CHURCH | $6,000 |
| BRAZOS VALLEY SYMPHONY SOCIETY | $5,000 |
| A HOPEFUL HARVEST | $5,000 |
| COLLEGE STATION ISD EDUCATION FOUND INC | $5,000 |
| YOUTH INC | $5,000 |
| REACH PROJECT | $5,000 |
| BRAZOS VALLEY REHABILITATION CENTER INC | $5,000 |
| BOYS CLUBS OF BRAZOS COUNTY INC | $5,000 |
| VOICES FOR CHILDREN INC | $5,000 |
| UNITY PARTNERS | $5,000 |
| RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES CENTRAL | $5,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY22–25, $51k) land where the poverty rate runs at 22%, against an area that typically sits at 18%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +35% since the first grant, against +17% for the ones you funded once.
25 repeat relationships — 15 still active in FY2025, 10 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 75% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $29k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- BVBRAZOS VALLEY FOOD BANK INC9× · 2017–2025 · $155k · revenue +39%
- TCTwin City Mission9× · 2017–2025 · $69k · revenue +35%
- BVBrazos Valley Symphony Society8× · 2017–2025 · $66k · revenue +31%
Funded once
- HFHABITAT FOR HUMANITYone grant, 2022 · $5k
- SAST ANDREWS EPISCOPAL CHURCHone grant, 2023 · $5k
- RMRONALD McDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES OF GREATER NORTH TEXAS INCone grant, 2022 · $5k · revenue +17%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To provide quality services and products to the residents and businesses of our community in such a way as to maximize the affordability of safe and decent housing, especially for the low income; and to serve as a vehicle and assist in any…
To provide guidance and support for persons affected by alcohol and substance abuse.
To provide quality services and products to the residents and businesses of our communities in such a way as to maximize the affordability of safe and decent housing, especially for the low income; and to serve as a vehicle and assist in…
To provide financial support for the charitable programs and activities of Voices for Children, Inc. a nonprofit corporation 501(c)(3) that provides advocacy services to children in the child welfare system due to abuse and/or neglect.
The United Way of the Brazos Valley brings the community together to find solutions that change people's lives. UWBV will be the community leader and trusted partner that proactively seeks solutions to community-wide issues.
To provide community, life-long learning, and meaningful work for adults with intellectual and developmental disabilities.
Comprehensive service to domestic violence and sexual assault victims
To educate, unite and focus our community's resources in order to efficiently address the most critical needs of Brazoria County
To protect and enhance the quality of life for abused and neglected children in Medina, Real and Uvalde Counties of Texas.
To share Christ with others through serving those in need in the brazos valley and surrounding areas or wherever God leads and to bridge the gap by joining churches and other groups in serving together.
To promote the health, social, educational, vocational and character development of youth in and around Lamar County, Texas.
Provide reliable transportation to people in need.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Hospice Brazos Valley Inc and the most unlike its peers is Ronald McDONALD House Charities of Greater North Texas Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
26 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 26 of the 44 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds BRAZOS VALLEY FOOD BANK INC ↗
- Who funds Health for All Inc ↗
- Who funds Twin City Mission ↗
- Who funds Brazos Valley Symphony Society ↗
- Who funds Hospice Brazos Valley Inc ↗
- Who funds BRAZOS VALLEY REHABILITATION CENTER ↗
- Who funds Boys Club of Brazos County Inc ↗
- Who funds Brazos Maternal and Child Health Clinic ↗
- Who funds Brazos County Rape Crisis Center Inc ↗
- Who funds College Station ISD Education Foundation Inc ↗
- Who funds Brazos Valley Museum of Natural History ↗
- Who funds The Reach Project ↗
- Who funds YOUTH INC ↗
- Who funds Voices for Children Inc ↗
- Who funds Childrens Museum of the Brazos Valley ↗
- Who funds BRYAN-COLLEGE STATION HABITAT FOR HUMANI ↗
- Who funds Unity Partners ↗
- Who funds RONALD McDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES OF GREATER NORTH TEXAS INC ↗
- Who funds Texas A&M Foundation ↗
- Who funds Scottys House Brazos Valley Child Advocacy Center Inc ↗
- Who funds BCS Together ↗
- Who funds BLUEBONNET EQUINE HUMANE SOCIETY INC ↗
- Who funds Aggieland Humane Society ↗
- Who funds S O S Ministries INC ↗
- Who funds Unlimited Potential Inc ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Edge Eugene III Charitable Trust · Winkler Nina Astin Trust · Lucille and John B Dougherty Trust · Nina Heard Astin Charitable Trust · Orr Waldon H and Adele Charitable Trust · M Bookman Peters Charitable Foundation · Virginia & Christian Groneman Charitable · United Way of the Brazos Valley · Marshall and Ellen Peters Family Foundation · Mervin and Annete Peters Family Foundation · Clifton C & Henrietta C Doak Charitable · Bubba Moore Memorial Group Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Gilbert & Thyra Plass Charitable Trust funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.