Skip to content

· Private foundation

Gilbert & Thyra Plass Charitable Trust

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$114k
Granted FY2025still arriving
22
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What it funds
0196% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Health$202kFood & Nutrition$165kHuman Services$138kReligion$107kArts & Culture$97kYouth Development$54kHousing & Shelter$45kCrime & Legal$36kOther$0
02FY2025 · 22 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k21 grants · $104k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $10k
$5,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$2.2M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
BRAZOS VALLEY FOOD BANK INC$10,000
HOSPICE BRAZOS VALLEY INC$7,000
HEALTH FOR ALL CLINIC INC$7,000
TWIN CITY MISSION$7,000
ST ANDREW'S EPISCOPAL CHURCH$6,000
REACH PROJECT$5,000
VOICES FOR CHILDREN INC$5,000
SCOTTYS HOUSE BRAZOS VALLEY CHILD ADVOCA$5,000
A HOPEFUL HARVEST$5,000
YOUTH INC$5,000
RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES CENTRAL$5,000
BRAZOS VALLEY REHABILITATION CENTER INC$5,000
TEXAS A&M FOUNDATION$5,000
BRAZOS VALLEY SYMPHONY SOCIETY$5,000
COLLEGE STATION ISD EDUCATION FOUND INC$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY22–25, $51k) land where the poverty rate runs at 22%, against an area that typically sits at 18%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 18%HOSPICE BRAZOS VALLEY INC: $10k → 22%HOSPICE BRAZOS VALLEY INC: $10k → 22%HOSPICE BRAZOS VALLEY: $10k → 22%HOSPICE BRAZOS VALLEY INC: $7k → 22%VOICES FOR CHILDREN INC: $5k → 22%VOICES FOR CHILDREN: $3k → 22%VOICES FOR CHILDREN INC: $3k → 22%BCS TOGETHER: $4k → 22%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

92%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$846k · 25 repeat orgs$73k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +35% since the first grant, against +17% for those funded once.

25 repeat relationships: 15 still active in FY2025, 10 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

25
12

Total granted

$846k
$44k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+35%
+17%

Still filing today

68%
33%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 75% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $29k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthHuman ServicesYouth DevelopmentEducationArts & CultureHousing & ShelterOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • BV
    BRAZOS VALLEY FOOD BANK INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $155k · revenue +39%
  • TC
    Twin City Mission
    9× · 2017–2025 · $69k · revenue +35%
  • BV
    Brazos Valley Symphony Society
    8× · 2017–2025 · $66k · revenue +31%

Funded once

  • HF
    HABITAT FOR HUMANITY
    one grant, 2022 · $5k
  • RM
    RONALD McDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES OF GREATER NORTH TEXAS INC
    one grant, 2022 · $5k · revenue +17%
  • SA
    ST ANDREWS EPISCOPAL CHURCH
    one grant, 2023 · $5k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Brazos Valley Affordable Housing Corporation

To provide quality services and products to the residents and businesses of our community in such a way as to maximize the affordability of safe and decent housing, especially for the low income; and to serve as a vehicle and assist in any…

Community Improvement
2
Brazos Valley Council on Alcohol and Substance Abuse

To provide guidance and support for persons affected by alcohol and substance abuse.

Health
3
Brazos Valley Cdc Inc

To provide quality services and products to the residents and businesses of our communities in such a way as to maximize the affordability of safe and decent housing, especially for the low income; and to serve as a vehicle and assist in…

Housing & Shelter
4
Casa of the Brazos Valley Foundation

To provide financial support for the charitable programs and activities of Voices for Children, Inc. a nonprofit corporation 501(c)(3) that provides advocacy services to children in the child welfare system due to abuse and/or neglect.

Philanthropy
5
United Way of the Brazos Valley

The United Way of the Brazos Valley brings the community together to find solutions that change people's lives. UWBV will be the community leader and trusted partner that proactively seeks solutions to community-wide issues.

Philanthropy
6
Brazos Employment Enterprises Dba the Bee Community

To provide community, life-long learning, and meaningful work for adults with intellectual and developmental disabilities.

—
7
Womens Center of Brazoria County Inc

Comprehensive service to domestic violence and sexual assault victims

Human Services
8
United Way of Brazoria County

To educate, unite and focus our community's resources in order to efficiently address the most critical needs of Brazoria County

Philanthropy
9
Bluebonnet Childrens Center

To protect and enhance the quality of life for abused and neglected children in Medina, Real and Uvalde Counties of Texas.

Crime & Legal
10
Bridge Ministries of Bryan Texas

To share Christ with others through serving those in need in the brazos valley and surrounding areas or wherever God leads and to bridge the gap by joining churches and other groups in serving together.

Religion
11
Boys & Girls Club of the Red River Valle y

To promote the health, social, educational, vocational and character development of youth in and around Lamar County, Texas.

—
12
OnRamp Inc

Provide reliable transportation to people in need.

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Hospice Brazos Valley Inc; the most unlike its peers is Ronald McDONALD House Charities of Greater North Texas Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

26 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 26 of the 44 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
7
Early backer (in before they grew)
26/26
Grantees still filing
16/26
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

ST ANDREWS EPISCOPAL CHURCH: $101,800 · OtherST ANDREWS EPISCOPAL CHURCHTwin City Mission: $69,000 · OtherTwin City MissionBrazos Valley Symphony Society: $66,000 · OtherBrazos Valley Symphony SocietyIndividual grant recipient: $37,500 · OtherIndividual grant recipientSCOTTY'S HOUSE: $17,000 · OtherTHE SALVATION ARMY: $15,000 · OtherThe Reach Project: $15,000 · Other+20 more: $104,000 · Other+20 moreHealth for All Inc: $107,000 · HealthHealth for All IncBRAZOS VALLEY REHABILITATION CENTER: $33,000 · HealthBRAZOS VALLEY REHABILIT…Brazos Maternal and Child Health Clinic: $25,000 · HealthBrazos Maternal and Chi…Brazos County Rape Crisis Center Inc: $21,000 · HealthBrazos County Rape Cris…+1 more: $5,000 · HealthBRAZOS VALLEY FOOD BANK INC: $155,000 · Food & NutritionBRAZOS VALLEY FOOD …Hospice Brazos Valley Inc: $37,000 · Human ServicesVoices for Children Inc: $10,000 · Human ServicesUnity Partners: $7,000 · Human ServicesBCS Together: $3,500 · Human ServicesUnlimited Potential Inc: $2,978 · Human ServicesBoys Club of Brazos County Inc: $28,000 · Youth DevelopmentYOUTH INC: $10,000 · Youth DevelopmentCollege Station ISD Education Foundation Inc: $20,000 · EducationTexas A&M Foundation: $5,000 · EducationBrazos Valley Museum of Natural History: $15,000 · Arts & CultureChildrens Museum of the Brazos Valley: $10,000 · Arts & Culture
Other$425,300Health$191,000Food & Nutrition$155,000Human Services$60,478Youth Development$38,000Education$25,000Arts & Culture$25,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetBRAZOS VALLEY FOOD BANK INC: $155,000 over 9y, 0.2% of budgetHealth for All Inc: $107,000 over 9y, 2.4% of budgetTwin City Mission: $69,000 over 9y, 0.2% of budgetBrazos Valley Symphony Society: $66,000 over 8y, 2.2% of budgetHospice Brazos Valley Inc: $37,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetBRAZOS VALLEY REHABILITATION CENTER: $33,000 over 8y, 0.2% of budgetBoys Club of Brazos County Inc: $28,000 over 6y, 0.4% of budgetBrazos Maternal and Child Health Clinic: $25,000 over 6y, 1.0% of budgetBrazos County Rape Crisis Center Inc: $21,000 over 5y, 0.9% of budgetCollege Station ISD Education Foundation Inc: $20,000 over 4y, 0.7% of budgetBrazos Valley Museum of Natural History: $15,000 over 3y, 1.1% of budgetThe Reach Project: $15,000 over 3y, 5.2% of budgetChildrens Museum of the Brazos Valley: $10,000 over 2y, 47% of budgetVoices for Children Inc: $10,000 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetBRYAN-COLLEGE STATION HABITAT FOR HUMANI: $8,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetUnity Partners: $7,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetScottys House Brazos Valley Child Advocacy Center Inc: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTexas A&M Foundation: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAggieland Humane Society: $3,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetS O S Ministries INC: $3,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetUnlimited Potential Inc: $2,978 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetBrazos Valley Chorale: $2,000 over 1y, 2.3% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds BRAZOS VALLEY FOOD BANK INC ↗
  • Who funds Health for All Inc ↗
  • Who funds Twin City Mission ↗
  • Who funds Brazos Valley Symphony Society ↗
  • Who funds Hospice Brazos Valley Inc ↗
  • Who funds BRAZOS VALLEY REHABILITATION CENTER ↗
  • Who funds Boys Club of Brazos County Inc ↗
  • Who funds Brazos Maternal and Child Health Clinic ↗
  • Who funds Brazos County Rape Crisis Center Inc ↗
  • Who funds College Station ISD Education Foundation Inc ↗
  • Who funds Brazos Valley Museum of Natural History ↗
  • Who funds The Reach Project ↗
  • Who funds YOUTH INC ↗
  • Who funds Childrens Museum of the Brazos Valley ↗
  • Who funds Voices for Children Inc ↗
  • Who funds BRYAN-COLLEGE STATION HABITAT FOR HUMANI ↗
  • Who funds Unity Partners ↗
  • Who funds RONALD McDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES OF GREATER NORTH TEXAS INC ↗
  • Who funds Scottys House Brazos Valley Child Advocacy Center Inc ↗
  • Who funds Texas A&M Foundation ↗
  • Who funds Aggieland Humane Society ↗
  • Who funds BCS Together ↗
  • Who funds BLUEBONNET EQUINE HUMANE SOCIETY INC ↗
  • Who funds S O S Ministries INC ↗
  • Who funds Unlimited Potential Inc ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Edge Eugene III Charitable TrustMO56× affinity24 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Edge Eugene III Charitable Trust · Winkler Nina Astin Trust · Lucille and John B Dougherty Trust · Nina Heard Astin Charitable Trust · Orr Waldon H and Adele Charitable Trust · M Bookman Peters Charitable Foundation · Virginia & Christian Groneman Charitable · United Way of the Brazos Valley · Marshall and Ellen Peters Family Foundation · Mervin and Annete Peters Family Foundation · Clifton C & Henrietta C Doak Charitable · Bubba Moore Memorial Group Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Gilbert & Thyra Plass Charitable Trust funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Gilbert & Thyra Plass Charitable Trust. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%3%13%28%50%funder's share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    11report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 44 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Gilbert & Thyra Plass’ filings →

    More from the funding graph