Skip to content

· Private foundation

Gidwitz Family Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$173k
Granted FY2023
53
Grants FY2023
—
States reached
$63k
Largest
01What it funds
0187% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Civil Rights$266kArts & Culture$227kEducation$196kEnvironment$88kPhilanthropy$83kHealth$33kReligion$26kHuman Services$20kOther$0
02FY2023 · 53 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 53 grants below total $141,554, the rows itemized in this filing. The $173,487 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $31,933 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2023

  • Under $10k49 grants · $34k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $45k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $63k
$250
Median grant
—
States reached
$406k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Steppenwolf Theater$62,500
Jewish United Fund$20,000
Brown University$15,000
New Bedford Light Report for America$10,000
N.B. Star Kids Scholarship$6,000
Unicef$4,000
Nativity Preparatory School$2,500
Gifford Law Center$2,000
US Ukraine Foundation$2,000
South Coast Community Fd$2,000
Planned Parenthood$2,000
Buzzards Bay Coalition$2,000
Salvation Army$1,500
National Audubon Society$1,000
DNRT$1,000
02Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

60%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$599k · 43 repeat orgs$404k to everyone else

43 repeat relationships: 32 still active in FY2023, 11 since wound down; 21 grantees were first funded in FY2023 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

43
82

Total granted

$599k
$299k

Still filing today

0%
16%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2023, 26% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $105k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23
EnvironmentInternationalArts & CultureHuman ServicesEducationRecreation & SportsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • BB
    Buzzards Bay Coalition
    3× · 2020–2023 · $247k
  • BU
    Brown University
    4× · 2019–2023 · $167k
  • ZT
    Zeiterion Theater
    2× · 2019–2021 · $108k

Funded once

  • BUZZARDS BAY COALITIONgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $80k · revenue +83%
  • BM
    Bastogne Memorial Fund
    one grant, 2019 · $50k
  • JU
    Jewish United Fund of Metro
    one grant, 2019 · $20k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

03Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Isabella Stewart Gardner Museum Inc

Organization's mission statement true to the ambitious vision of its founder and her spirit of creative risk-taking, the mission of the isabella stewart gardner museum is: - to bring to life and preserve the rich historic collection; - to…

Arts & Culture
2
American Museum of Natural History

The museum's mission statement is: "to discover, interpret, and disseminate - through scientific research and education - knowledge about human cultures, the natural world, and the universe."

Arts & Culture
3
New England Museum Association

New england museum association's mission is to connect a community engaged in learning, collaboration, and action to cultivate a better museum world.

—
4
The Norman Bird Sanctuary Trust

Our mission is to spark people's curiosity to explore, steward, and find peace and joy in nature. in service to this, norman bird sanctuary inspires, builds, and engages a community of stewards who preserve, protect, enjoy, and learn from…

Animals
5
Science Museum of Minnesota

The museum's mission statement is "turn on the science: inspire learning. inform policy. improve lives."

Arts & Culture
6
Seacoast Science Center Inc

It is the mission of the seacoast science center to spark curiosity, enhance understanding, and inspire conservation of our blue planet. the center's programming and exhibits encourage visitors and other program participants to recognize…

Arts & Culture
7
Uss Constitution Museum Inc

The uss constitution museum engages all ages in the story of "old ironsides" to spark excitement about maritime heritage, naval service, and the american experience.

Arts & Culture
8
Maine Maritime Museum

To connect people to the past, present, and future of Maine's waterways and their global reach.

Arts & Culture
9
The Newark Museum Association

Nmoa mission statement is: we welcome everyone with inclusive experiences that spark curiosity and foster community.

Arts & Culture
10
New York Botanical Garden

The new york botanical garden is a museum of plants and a scientific research center devoted to the study of plants and their uses. it is the garden's mission to improve public understanding of the natural world, horticulture, and the…

Environment
11
New England Historic Genealogical Society

New england historic genealogical society's mission is to advance the study of family history in america and beyond. we educate, inspire, and connect people through our scholarship, collections, and expertise. we conduct business under the…

—
12
Newport Art Museum and Art Association

The newport art museum's mission is to share a diversity of art and experiences that spark reflection, inspiration, and connection within our newport community and beyond. the museum was founded in 1912 on the belief that arts and culture…

Arts & Culture
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Native Plant Trust Inc; the most unlike its peers is Middle East Media and Research Institute Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
03the grantee network

14 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 14 of the 146 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
13/14
Grantees still filing
11/14
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Buzzards Bay Coalition: $247,000 · OtherBuzzards Bay CoalitionBrown University: $167,125 · OtherBrown UniversityZeiterion Theater: $107,500 · OtherZeiterion TheaterSteppenwolf Theater: $62,500 · OtherSteppenwolf TheaterBastogne Memorial Fund: $50,000 · OtherBastogne Memorial Fund+129 more: $285,577 · Other+129 moreBUZZARDS BAY COALITION: $80,000 · EnvironmentBUZZARDS …+3 more: $1,300 · EnvironmentMIDDLE EAST MEDIA AND RESEARCH INSTITUTE INC: $1,000 · InternationalWHITFIELD-MANJIRO FRIENDSHIP SOCIETY INC: $35 · InternationalMUSEUM OF FINE ARTS: $275 · Arts & CultureOld Dartmouth Historical Society: $250 · Arts & CultureNORTHSTAR LEARNING CENTERS INC: $500 · Human ServicesOUR SISTERS SCHOOL: $300 · EducationFRESH AIR FUND: $200 · Recreation & SportsSTOP PREDATORY GAMBLING FOUNDATION: $100 · Health
Other$919,702Environment$81,300International$1,035Arts & Culture$525Human Services$500Education$300Recreation & Sports$200Health$100

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetBUZZARDS BAY COALITION: $80,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetArt Museum New Bedford Inc: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMIDDLE EAST MEDIA AND RESEARCH INSTITUTE INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNATIVE PLANT TRUST INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNORTHSTAR LEARNING CENTERS INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetOUR SISTERS SCHOOL: $300 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMUSEUM OF FINE ARTS: $275 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetOld Dartmouth Historical Society: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFRESH AIR FUND: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE GARDEN CLUB OF AMERICA: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN LITTORAL SOCIETY: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds BUZZARDS BAY COALITION ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Donor Advised Charitable Giving IncCO5.4× affinity4 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Gidwitz Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Gidwitz Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%23%45%68%90%share of the org’s income from government →median 3%
  • Northstar Learning Centers Inc: 63% of income from government
  • Buzzards Bay Coalition: 37% of income from government
  • Whitfield-Manjiro Friendship Society Inc: 31% of income from government
  • Native Plant Trust Inc: 3% of income from government
  • Old Dartmouth Historical Society: 2% of income from government
  • American Littoral Society: 1% of income from government
  • Museum of Fine Arts: 0% of income from government
  • Our Sisters School: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
04Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Gidwitz Family Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Gidwitz Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 146 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2023, released 2023. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2024) is on record and reports $470k of grant expense with no grantee named in the published copy. A private foundation itemizes every grant it makes, so a return carrying none has filed its list as an attachment that the public copy does not include. The figures above are therefore from FY2023, the most recent year this funder’s grantee list reached the public record.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Gidwitz Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph