Skip to content
Ghost Tree Invitational Ltd at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

Ghost Tree Invitational Ltd

Benefit and support local charities.

$45k
Granted FY2024still arriving
3
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$13k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Health$184kYouth Development$117kCivil Rights$92kHuman Services$60kPhilanthropy$10kRecreation & Sports$9kArts & Culture$7k
02FY2024 · 3 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 3 grants below total $32,300, the rows itemized in this filing. The $45,300 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $13,000 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k1 grant · $9k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $24k
$11,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$81k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF BEND INC$12,800
CASA OF JACKSON COUNTY$11,000
ASANTE FOUNDATION$8,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 56% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%LA PINE HIGH SCHOOL ATHLETIC DPTMT: $9k → 10%CASA OF JACKSON COUNTY: $22k → 13%PALO VERDE DANCE TEAM: $7k → 13%BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF BEND INC: $38k → 10%ASANTE FOUNDATION: $18k → 13%LEUKEMIALYMPHOMA SOCIETY OF S NV: $10k → 13%BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF BEND INC: $28k → 10%CASA OF JACKSON COUNTY: $17k → 13%KEEP MEMORY ALIVE: $21k → 13%BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF BEND INC: $21k → 10%ASANTE FOUNDATION: $17k → 13%KEEP MEMORY ALIVE: $11k → 13%RONALD MCDONAL HOUSE CHARITIES: $20k → 10%CASA OF JACKSON COUNTY: $17k → 13%KEEP MEMORY ALIVE: $10k → 13%THE CENTER FOUNDATION: $16k → 10%CASA OF JACKSON COUNTY: $15k → 13%UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER: $19k → 13%RONALD MCDONAL HOUSE CHARITIES: $16k → 10%ASANTE FOUNDATION: $14k → 13%UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER: $9k → 13%BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF BEND INC: $13k → 10%ASANTE FOUNDATION: $12k → 13%OGDEN FAMILY FOUNDATION: $10k → 13%RONALD MCDONAL HOUSE CHARITIES: $11k → 10%ASANTE FOUNDATION: $11k → 13%BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF BEND INC: $9k → 10%CASA OF JACKSON COUNTY: $11k → 13%BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF BEND INC: $9k → 10%CASA OF JACKSON COUNTY: $9k → 13%RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES: $7k → 10%ASANTE FOUNDATION: $9k → 13%RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES: $7k → 10%HEALING REINSTHERAPEUTIC RIDING CTR: $7k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

88%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$420k · 6 repeat orgs$59k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +36% since the first grant, against -18% for those funded once.

6 repeat relationships: 3 still active in FY2024, 3 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

6
6

Total granted

$420k
$59k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+36%
-18%

Still filing today

50%
67%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’21’22’23’24
HealthEducationYouth DevelopmentCivil RightsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • BOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF BEND INC
    6× · 2017–2024 · $117k · revenue +95%
  • CASA OF JACKSON COUNTY INC
    6× · 2017–2024 · $92k · revenue +33%
  • ASANTE FOUNDATION
    6× · 2017–2024 · $81k · revenue +36%

Funded once

  • TC
    THE CENTER FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2023 · $16k · revenue -16%
  • TJ
    THE JONOTHAN OGDEN FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2019 · $10k · revenue -46%
  • BC
    BLOOD CANCER UNITED INC
    one grant, 2018 · $10k · revenue -18%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field
04the grantee network

7 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 7 of the 12 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
7/7
Grantees still filing
3/7
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Ronald McDonald House Charities: $60,000 · OtherRonald McDonald House CharitiesKEEP MEMORY ALIVE: $42,600 · OtherKEEP MEMORY ALIVEUNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER OF SOUTHERN NEVADA: $28,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER OF SOUTH…BEND-LAPINE SCHOOL DISTRICT: $9,000 · OtherBEND-LAPINE SCHOOL DISTRICTCLARK COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT: $7,000 · OtherBOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF BEND INC: $117,400 · Youth DevelopmentBOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF BEN…ASANTE FOUNDATION: $80,604 · HealthASANTE FOUNDATIONBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC: $10,000 · HealthBLOOD CANCER UNITED IN…HEALING REINS EQUINE ASSISTED SERVICES INC: $6,500 · HealthHEALING REINS EQUINE A…CASA OF JACKSON COUNTY INC: $91,528 · Civil RightsCASA OF JACKSON COUNT…THE CENTER FOUNDATION: $16,200 · EducationTHE JONOTHAN OGDEN FOUNDATION: $10,000 · Education
Other$146,600Youth Development$117,400Health$97,104Civil Rights$91,528Education$26,200

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetBOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF BEND INC: $117,400 over 6y, 3.7% of budgetCASA OF JACKSON COUNTY INC: $91,528 over 6y, 2.1% of budgetASANTE FOUNDATION: $80,604 over 6y, 0.4% of budgetTHE CENTER FOUNDATION: $16,200 over 1y, 3.0% of budgetTHE JONOTHAN OGDEN FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 1y, 5.1% of budgetBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHEALING REINS EQUINE ASSISTED SERVICES INC: $6,500 over 1y, 0.3% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds BOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF BEND INC ↗
  • Who funds CASA OF JACKSON COUNTY INC ↗
  • Who funds ASANTE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds THE CENTER FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds THE JONOTHAN OGDEN FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds BLOOD CANCER UNITED INC ↗
  • Who funds HEALING REINS EQUINE ASSISTED SERVICES INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Oregon Community …The Ford Family Found…St Charles Health Sys…The Roundhouse Founda…First Interstate Banc…Donor Advised Charita…Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
The Oregon Community FoundationOR16.6× affinity6 shared granteesties to 7 of 7Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Oregon Community Foundation · The Ford Family Foundation · St Charles Health System Inc · The Roundhouse Foundation · First Interstate BancSystem Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Ghost Tree Invitational Ltd funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Ghost Tree Invitational Ltd. Bigger dots raise more.

2023
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government →median 16%
  • Healing Reins Equine Assisted Services Inc: 16% of income from government
  • Casa of Jackson County Inc: 3% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 12 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Ghost Tree Invitational Ltd’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home