Skip to content
Getzler Foundation Inc at a glance

· Private foundation

Getzler Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$45k
Granted FY2022
12
Grants FY2022
3
States reached
$20k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its fieldRead
04Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
0160% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Public Safety & Disaster$38kEducation$20kReligion$5kInternational$3kHealth$3kFood & Nutrition$1kPhilanthropy$500Other$0
02FY2022 · 12 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 12 grants below total $31,530, the rows itemized in this filing. The $44,530 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $13,000 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2022

  • Under $10k11 grants · $12k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $20k
$1,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$1.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
LURIA ACADEMY OF BROOKLYN$20,000
HADAR INSTITUTE$3,600
BERGEN HATZALAH EMERGENCY MED$1,000
ISRAEL SPECIAL KIDS FUND$1,000
AMERICAN FRIENDS OF LEKET ISRAEL$1,000
GABRIEL PROJECT MUMBAI$1,000
CHASDEI DEVORAH INC$1,000
CENTRAL FUND FOR ISRAEL$1,000
JDC$750
JEWISH FEDERATION OF LA$500
SHARSHERET$500
KOLLEL AISH TAMID INC$180
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–21, $540) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%PROJECT EZRAH: $540 → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Sherit Isroel
—
2
Israel Select Charity Fund Inc

Helping individuals and organizations with great needs and little resources and with often few options.

Human Services
3
Committee for the Rescue of Israel Babies Dba Efrat

Educational, social and financial assistance to distressed women in Israel with unwanted pregnancies. Clients are educated as to their medical options and are given financial support to the extent needed to be able to deliver a healthy baby

Human Services
4
The Keren Rachaim Fund
—
5
Friends of Halonot Inc

Support of Friends of Halonot is a post high-school education institution for women located in Jerusalem, Israel. The organization's mission is to recruit, educate and inspire young jewish women to learn and further connect with Judaism.

Public Benefit
6
Ohr Meir Ubracha

The organization provides financial assistance to victims of acts of terrorism in the state of israel.

Philanthropy
7
Zichron Avrohom Yosef
Philanthropy
8
Shaarei Halacha Inc
Philanthropy
9
Yeshiva Ohr Yisroel
Philanthropy
10
Adi Israel Foundation Inc

Aleh Israel Foundation, Inc.(The Foundation)is a Foundation that provides support to rehabilitative centers caring for most severely disabled children in Israel.

International
11
American Friends of Ish El Rayahu

To promote, benefit, and support Jewish religious, charitable & educational activities in Israel and the USA.

Religion
12
Zohar Hatorah Inc

Religious School

Religion
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Chasdei Devorah Inc; the most unlike its peers is Gabriel Project Mumbai. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 17 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
7/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

West Side Hatzoloh: $37,500 · HealthWest Side Hatzoloh+1 more: $500 · HealthLURIA ACADEMY OF BROOKLYN: $20,000 · EducationLURIA ACADEMY OF BROOKLYNIndividual grant recipient: $4,950 · OtherIndividual grant r…HADAR INSTITUTE: $3,600 · OtherHADAR INSTITUTECONGREGATION BETH AARON OF TEANECK: $1,000 · OtherCONGREGATION BETH …BERGEN HATZALAH EMERGENCY MED: $1,000 · OtherBERGEN HATZALAH EM…JDC: $750 · OtherJDCJEWISH FEDERATION OF LA: $500 · Other+2 more: $360 · OtherGabriel Project Mumbai: $1,000 · InternationalCentral Fund of Israel: $1,000 · InternationalCHASDEI DEVORAH INC: $1,000 · InternationalISRAEL SPECIAL KIDS FUND: $1,000 · Human ServicesProject Ezra: $540 · Human ServicesAMERICAN FRIENDS OF LEKET ISRAEL INC: $1,000 · Philanthropy
Health$38,000Education$20,000Other$12,160International$3,000Human Services$1,540Philanthropy$1,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetWest Side Hatzoloh: $37,500 over 1y, 3.1% of budgetLURIA ACADEMY OF BROOKLYN: $20,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetGabriel Project Mumbai: $1,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetCentral Fund of Israel: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCHASDEI DEVORAH INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetISRAEL SPECIAL KIDS FUND: $1,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF LEKET ISRAEL INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetProject Ezra: $540 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSharsheret Inc: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Jewish Communal FundVanguard Charitable E…Donor Advised Charita…Fidelity Investments …American Online Givin…Amazonsmile Foundation
Jewish Communal FundNY19.4× affinity8 shared granteesties to 5 of 5Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Jewish Communal Fund · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Getzler Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Getzler Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    04Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Getzler Foundation Inc?

    Find your warmest path to Getzler Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 17 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2022, released 2022. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2025) is on record and reports $39k of grant expense with no grantee named in the published copy. A private foundation itemizes every grant it makes, so a return carrying none has filed its list as an attachment that the public copy does not include. The figures above are therefore from FY2022, the most recent year this funder’s grantee list reached the public record.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Getzler’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home