Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Getzler Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$45k
Granted FY2022
12
Grants FY2022
3
States reached
$20k
Largest
01What you fund
0160% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172025.

Public Safety & Disaster$38kEducation$20kReligion$5kInternational$3kHealth$3kFood & Nutrition$1kPhilanthropy$500Other$0
02FY2022 · 12 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 12 grants below total $31,530 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $44,530 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $13,000 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

By grant size · FY2022

  • Under $10k11 grants · $12k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $20k
$1,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$1.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
LURIA ACADEMY OF BROOKLYN$20,000
HADAR INSTITUTE$3,600
BERGEN HATZALAH EMERGENCY MED$1,000
GABRIEL PROJECT MUMBAI$1,000
CHASDEI DEVORAH INC$1,000
ISRAEL SPECIAL KIDS FUND$1,000
AMERICAN FRIENDS OF LEKET ISRAEL$1,000
CENTRAL FUND FOR ISRAEL$1,000
JDC$750
JEWISH FEDERATION OF LA$500
SHARSHERET$500
KOLLEL AISH TAMID INC$180
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY21–21, $540) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%PROJECT EZRAH: $540 → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Sherit Isroel
2
Israel Select Charity Fund Inc

Helping individuals and organizations with great needs and little resources and with often few options.

Human Services
3
Committee for the Rescue of Israel Babies Dba Efrat

Educational, social and financial assistance to distressed women in Israel with unwanted pregnancies. Clients are educated as to their medical options and are given financial support to the extent needed to be able to deliver a healthy baby

Human Services
4
The Keren Rachaim Fund
5
Friends of Halonot Inc

Support of Friends of Halonot is a post high-school education institution for women located in Jerusalem, Israel. The organization's mission is to recruit, educate and inspire young jewish women to learn and further connect with Judaism.

Public Benefit
6
Ohr Meir Ubracha

The organization provides financial assistance to victims of acts of terrorism in the state of israel.

Philanthropy
7
Zichron Avrohom Yosef
Philanthropy
8
Shaarei Halacha Inc
Philanthropy
9
Yeshiva Ohr Yisroel
Philanthropy
10
Adi Israel Foundation Inc

Aleh Israel Foundation, Inc.(The Foundation)is a Foundation that provides support to rehabilitative centers caring for most severely disabled children in Israel.

International
11
American Friends of Ish El Rayahu

To promote, benefit, and support Jewish religious, charitable & educational activities in Israel and the USA.

Religion
12
Zohar Hatorah Inc

Religious School

Religion

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Chasdei Devorah Inc and the most unlike its peers is Gabriel Project Mumbai. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 17 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
7/9
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

West Side Hatzoloh — $37,500 · HealthWest Side Hatzoloh+1 more — $500 · HealthLURIA ACADEMY OF BROOKLYN — $20,000 · EducationLURIA ACADEMY OF BROOKLYNIndividual grant recipient — $4,950 · OtherIndividual grant r…HADAR INSTITUTE — $3,600 · OtherHADAR INSTITUTECONGREGATION BETH AARON OF TEANECK — $1,000 · OtherCONGREGATION BETH …BERGEN HATZALAH EMERGENCY MED — $1,000 · OtherBERGEN HATZALAH EM…JDC — $750 · OtherJDCJEWISH FEDERATION OF LA — $500 · Other+2 more — $360 · OtherCentral Fund of Israel — $1,000 · InternationalGabriel Project Mumbai — $1,000 · InternationalCHASDEI DEVORAH INC — $1,000 · InternationalISRAEL SPECIAL KIDS FUND — $1,000 · Human ServicesProject Ezra — $540 · Human ServicesAMERICAN FRIENDS OF LEKET ISRAEL INC — $1,000 · Philanthropy
Health$38,000Education$20,000Other$12,160International$3,000Human Services$1,540Philanthropy$1,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetWest Side Hatzoloh — $37,500 over 1y, 3.1% of budgetLURIA ACADEMY OF BROOKLYN — $20,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetCentral Fund of Israel — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGabriel Project Mumbai — $1,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetISRAEL SPECIAL KIDS FUND — $1,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF LEKET ISRAEL INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCHASDEI DEVORAH INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetProject Ezra — $540 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSharsheret Inc — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Jewish Communal FundNY19.4× affinity8 shared granteesties to 5 of 5Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Jewish Communal Fund · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Getzler Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    04Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Getzler Foundation Inc?

    Find your warmest path to Getzler Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 17 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2022, released 2022. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2025) is on record and reports $39k of grant expense with no grantee named in the published copy. A private foundation itemizes every grant it makes, so a return carrying none has filed its list as an attachment that the public copy does not include. The figures above are therefore from FY2022, the most recent year this funder’s grantee list reached the public record.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph