Skip to content
Get Envolved Foundation at a glance

· Private foundation

Get Envolved Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$4k
Granted FY2025still arriving
7
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$1k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2021 to 2025.

Health$14kHuman Services$9kArts & Culture$6kReligion$4kPhilanthropy$3kCommunity Improvement$2kHousing & Shelter$1kEnvironment$1kOther$0
02FY2025 · 7 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$500
Median grant
4
States reached
$175k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CROSSTOWN RADIO PARTNERSHIP - WYXR RADIO$1,000
MILE HIGH MINISTRIES$1,000
DRUIDS CHARITY CLUB$1,000
CHILDREN'S PROTECTIVE ASSOCIATION$500
STAR CHARTER SCHOOL$250
QUARTERBACKING CHILDREN'S HEALTH FOUNDATION$250
YMCA OF GREATER MONTGOMERY$100
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY22–25, $2k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 75% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%H-TOWN DREAM CENTER: $500 → 9%MILE HIGH MINISTRIES: $1k → 12%CHILDREN'S PROTECTIVE ASSOCIATION: $500 → 18%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
NY
CO
KY
VA
TN
MS
AL
GA
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 6% of Get Envolved Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address.

Get Envolved Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

37%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$14k · 5 repeat orgs$23k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +59% since the first grant, against -17% for those funded once.

5 repeat relationships: 4 still active in FY2025, 1 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

5
11

Total granted

$14k
$22k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+59%
-17%

Still filing today

60%
82%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 57% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $2k went to new ones.

50%100%’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesHealthHousing & ShelterPhilanthropyArts & CultureAnimalsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • DC
    Druids Charity Club Inc
    4× · 2022–2025 · $4k · revenue +32%
  • QC
    Quarterbacking Children's Health Foundation
    2× · 2022–2025 · $2k · revenue +186%
  • THE BREAST CANCER RESEARCH FOUNDATION INC
    2× · 2021–2022 · $1k · revenue +59%

Funded once

  • FS
    FAMILY SCHOLAR HOUSE INCgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $7k · revenue +198%
  • CU
    Citizens United for Research in Epilepsy
    one grant, 2024 · $5k · revenue -17%
  • GR
    GREATER RICHMOND INTERFAITH PROGRAM
    one grant, 2021 · $3k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Curesearch for Children's Cancer

Curesearch's mission is to fund & support targeted & innovative cancer research with measurable results, & to be the authoritative source of information & resources for all those affected by children's cancer. see schedule o for…

Health
2
Cystic Fibrosis Research Institute

To fund cystic fibrosis research, provide educational and personal support, and to spread awareness of cystic fibrosis, a life-threatening genetic disease.

Health
3
CancerFree Kids

CancerFree KIDS exists to raise awareness of the need for more funding for pediatric cancer research and to raise funds that are invested in early stage, potentially game-changing research focused on gentler treatments and cures for…

Health
4
The Curetivity Foundation

Provide monetary or financial aid exclusively for charitable, religious, scientific, literary or educational purposes and to solicit, receive, maintain and disburse funds for these purposes and for the betterment of children.

Health
5
The Childrens Cancer Foundation Inc

The Childrens Cancer Foundation, Inc. (Organization) is a charitable, not-for-profit corporation committed to funding locally-based researchers, programs and facilities until every child is assured a healthy cancer free future. The…

—
6
Children's Tumor Foundation

Our mission: drive research, expand knowledge, and advance care for the nf community. our vision: end nf.

Health
7
Ccri Inc

The mission of CCRI is to enhance and enrich the lives and learning of people with disabilities. We help people overcome obstacles by offering unique community opportunities to children, adults, and families affected by disability. Our…

—
8
The Children's Cancer Fund

The organization raises, receives and administers funds for the purpose of engaging in and/or funding research and patient services in the area of shildhood cancers and improving the quality of life of children diagnosed with cancer.

Health
9
Children's Cancer Family Foundation of Ne Wi Inc

Raise money to support families and children suffering from childhood cancer.

Health
10
Pediatric Cancer Research Foundation

Fund research to power cures that reduce the percentage of children who perish from cancer until that number reaches zero.

—
11
Montgomery County Community Foundation

The mission of the Montgomery County Community Foundation (MCCF) is to provide leadership in Montgomery County by directing sustainable financial resources that strengthen our community and improve the quality of life for current and…

Philanthropy
12
Columbus Children's Foundation

Accelerating the most effective gene therapy treatments for children with ultra-rare diseases.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Common Ground Montgomery; the most unlike its peers is East Texas Dream Center. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

15 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 15 of the 20 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
15/15
Grantees still filing
6/15
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CROSSTOWN RADIO PARTNERSHIP - WYXR RADIO: $4,500 · OtherCROSSTOWN RADIO PARTNERSHIP - WYXR R…GREATER RICHMOND INTERFAITH PROGRAM: $2,500 · OtherGREATER RICHMOND INTERFAITH PROGRAMYMCA OF GREATER MONTGOMERY: $1,900 · OtherYMCA OF GREATER MONTGOMERYREDI CORPORATION: $1,000 · OtherREDI CORPORATIONBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF MONTGOMERY: $500 · OtherALABAMA WILDLIFE FEDERATION: $1,000 · OtherALABAMA WILDLIFE FEDERATIONTHE BREAST CANCER RESEARCH FOUNDATION INC: $1,000 · OtherTHE BREAST CANCER RESEARCH FOUNDATIO…+2 more: $408 · OtherCitizens United for Research in Epilepsy: $5,000 · HealthCitizens United for Resea…Druids Charity Club Inc: $4,000 · HealthDruids Charity Club IncFAMILY SCHOLAR HOUSE INC: $7,400 · Housing & ShelterFAMILY SCHOLAR HOUSE …COWETA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC: $2,500 · PhilanthropyCOWETA COMMUN…Quarterbacking Children's Health Foundation: $2,250 · PhilanthropyQuarterbackin…MILE HIGH MINISTRIES: $1,000 · Human ServicesCHILDREN'S PROTECTIVE ASSOCIATION INC: $500 · Human ServicesEAST TEXAS DREAM CENTER: $500 · Human ServicesPALMER HOME FOR CHILDREN: $100 · Human ServicesCOMMON GROUND MONTGOMERY: $2,000 · Youth DevelopmentKELLY FITZPATRICK CENTER FOR THE ARTS INC: $1,500 · Arts & Culture
Other$12,808Health$9,000Housing & Shelter$7,400Philanthropy$4,750Human Services$2,100Youth Development$2,000Arts & Culture$1,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetFAMILY SCHOLAR HOUSE INC: $7,400 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetCitizens United for Research in Epilepsy: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetDruids Charity Club Inc: $4,000 over 4y, 4.1% of budgetCOWETA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC: $2,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetQuarterbacking Children's Health Foundation: $2,250 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetCOMMON GROUND MONTGOMERY: $2,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetKELLY FITZPATRICK CENTER FOR THE ARTS INC: $1,500 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetALABAMA WILDLIFE FEDERATION: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE BREAST CANCER RESEARCH FOUNDATION INC: $1,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMILE HIGH MINISTRIES: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetREDI CORPORATION: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCHILDREN'S PROTECTIVE ASSOCIATION INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetEAST TEXAS DREAM CENTER: $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE SKIN CANCER FOUNDATION INC: $158 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPALMER HOME FOR CHILDREN: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Natl Christian Charit…The Bank of America C…Donor Advised Charita…Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
Natl Christian Charitable Fdn IncGA9.9× affinity7 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Get Envolved Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Get Envolved Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    7report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Get Envolved Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Get Envolved Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 20 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Get Envolved’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home