Skip to content

· Private foundation

Gertrude S Gordon Foundation Xxxxxx0291

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$524k
Granted FY2025still arriving
10
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$140k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Philanthropy$1.3MHealth$1.1MEducation$636kYouth Development$490kHuman Services$474kReligion$268kAnimals$262kInternational$115k
02FY2025 · 10 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k7 grants · $207k
  • $50k–250k3 grants · $317k
$31,243
Median grant
2
States reached
$9.0M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
LA CROSSE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION$139,618
GUNDERSEN LUTHERAN MEDICAL FDN$118,519
BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF LA CROSSE$58,796
FIRST PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH$31,834
COULEE REGION HUMANE SOCIETY$31,243
LA CROSSE PUBLIC LIBRARY$30,883
UNITED FUND$29,438
LA CROSSE PUBLIC EDUCATION FDN$29,309
BETHANY LUTHERAN HOMES INC$28,705
SALVATION ARMY$25,260
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF LA CROSSE: $71k → 12%SALVATION ARMY: $30k → 17%SALVATION ARMY: $27k → 14%BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF LA CROSSE: $59k → 12%BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF LA CROSSE: $52k → 12%BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF LA CROSSE: $49k → 12%COULEE REGION HUMANE SOCIETY: $38k → 12%COULEE REGION HUMANE SOCIETY: $31k → 12%COULEE REGION HUMANE SOCIETY: $28k → 12%LA CROSSE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $165k → 12%LA CROSSE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $151k → 12%LA CROSSE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $145k → 12%LA CROSSE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $144k → 12%GUNDERSEN LUTHERAN MEDICAL FOUNDATI: $140k → 12%LA CROSSE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $140k → 12%LA CROSSE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $136k → 12%LA CROSSE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $134k → 12%GUNDERSEN LUTHERAN MEDICAL FDN: $129k → 12%LA CROSSE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $128k → 12%GUNDERSEN LUTHERAN MEDICAL FOUNDATI: $123k → 12%GUNDERSEN LUTHERAN MEDICAL FDN: $122k → 12%GUNDERSEN LUTHERAN MEDICAL FDN: $119k → 12%GUNDERSEN LUTHERAN MEDICAL FDN: $115k → 12%GUNDERSEN LUTHERAN MEDICAL FOUNDATION: $114k → 12%LA CROSSE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $112k → 12%GUNDERSEN LUTHERAN MEDICAL FOUNDATI: $108k → 12%GUNDERSEN LUTHERAN MEDICAL FOUNDATI: $95k → 12%BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF LA CROSSE: $59k → 12%BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF LA CROSSE: $54k → 12%BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF LA CROSSE: $49k → 12%BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF LA CROSSE: $49k → 12%BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF LA CROSSE: $48k → 12%FIRST PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH: $39k → 12%LA CROSSE PUBLIC LIBRARY: $38k → 12%UNITED FUND: $35k → 12%FIRST PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH: $32k → 12%FIRST PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH: $32k → 12%COULEE REGION HUMANE SOCIETY: $32k → 12%LA CROSSE PUBLIC LIBRARY: $32k → 12%LA CROSSE PUBLIC LIBRARY: $31k → 12%FIRST PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH: $30k → 12%UNITED FUND: $29k → 12%UNITED FUND FOR ARTS AND HUMANITY: $29k → 12%COULEE REGION HUMANE SOCIETY: $29k → 12%LA CROSSE PUBLIC LIBRARY: $29k → 12%FIRST PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH: $28k → 12%LA CROSSE PUBLIC LIBRARY: $27k → 12%FIRST PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH: $27k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

100%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$3.3M · 11 repeat orgs$0 to everyone else

11 repeat relationships: 9 still active in FY2025, 2 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

11
0

Total granted

$3.3M
$0

Still filing today

45%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthYouth DevelopmentAnimalsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • GL
    Gundersen Lutheran Medical Foundation Inc
    9× · 2017–2025 · $1.1M · revenue +42%
  • BA
    BOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF GREATER LA CROSS
    9× · 2017–2025 · $490k · revenue +299%
  • LC
    LA CROSSE PUBLIC EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $247k · revenue +80%

Funded once

    How this is measured

    Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

    04Its field
    04the grantee network

    6 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

    Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

    How this is measured

    Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 6 of the 12 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

    Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

    0
    Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
    3
    Early backer (in before they grew)
    6/6
    Grantees still filing
    5/6
    Grew since first funded

    Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

    FIRST PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH: $267,999 · OtherFIRST PRESBYTERIAN CHURCHLA CROSSE PUBLIC LIBRARY: $260,101 · OtherLA CROSSE PUBLIC LIBRARYLA CROSSE PUBLIC EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC: $246,700 · OtherLA CROSSE PUBLIC EDUCATION FOUNDATION…BETHANY LUTHERAN HOMES INC: $242,023 · OtherBETHANY LUTHERAN HOMES INCUNITED FUND FOR ARTS AND HUMANITY: $129,265 · OtherUNITED FUND FOR ARTS AND HUMANITYSALVATION ARMY: $127,722 · OtherSALVATION ARMYUNITED FUND: $114,552 · OtherUNITED FUNDTHE SALVATION ARMY: $104,385 · OtherTHE SALVATION ARMYLA CROSSE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $1,254,703 · PhilanthropyLA CROSSE COMMUNITY FOUNDATIONGundersen Lutheran Medical Foundation Inc: $1,063,400 · HealthGundersen Lutheran Medical…BOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF GREATER LA CROSS: $490,458 · Youth DevelopmentBOYS AND GIR…COULEE REGION HUMANE SOCIETY INC: $262,227 · Animals
    Other$1,492,747Philanthropy$1,254,703Health$1,063,400Youth Development$490,458Animals$262,227

    Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

    25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetLA CROSSE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $1,254,703 over 9y, 3.7% of budgetGundersen Lutheran Medical Foundation Inc: $1,063,400 over 9y, 0.5% of budgetBOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF GREATER LA CROSS: $490,458 over 9y, 2.0% of budgetCOULEE REGION HUMANE SOCIETY INC: $262,227 over 9y, 2.2% of budgetLA CROSSE PUBLIC EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC: $246,700 over 9y, 12% of budgetBETHANY LUTHERAN HOMES INC: $242,023 over 9y, 0.1% of budget
    Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

    A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

    • Who funds LA CROSSE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
    • Who funds Gundersen Lutheran Medical Foundation Inc ↗
    • Who funds BOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF GREATER LA CROSS ↗
    • Who funds COULEE REGION HUMANE SOCIETY INC ↗
    • Who funds LA CROSSE PUBLIC EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC ↗
    • Who funds BETHANY LUTHERAN HOMES INC ↗

    Co-funders

    Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

    Dahl Family Foundation Xxxxxx6214WI15.8× affinity5 shared granteesties to 9 of 9Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

    Open a dossier: Dahl Family Foundation Xxxxxx6214 · La Crosse Community Foundation · Donald a Gordon Foundation Xxxxxx0175 · Locher Family Foundation Trust Xxxxxx1227 · Lyche Family Foundation Inc · Cleary-Kumm Foundation Inc · Mayo Clinic Group Return · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

    How this is measured
    Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

    How much its grantees rely on government

    Each dot is one organization Gertrude S Gordon Foundation Xxxxxx0291 funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Gertrude S Gordon Foundation Xxxxxx0291. Bigger dots raise more.

    2024
    ’20’21’22’23’24
    no gov · 00%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government →
      no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
      0get no government money at all
      2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
      0rely on government for over half their income
      ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
      typical government reliance, FY20–24
      How this is measured
      Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
      05Through Plinth

      Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

      How do I get to Gertrude S Gordon Foundation Xxxxxx0291?

      Find your warmest path to Gertrude S Gordon Foundation Xxxxxx0291 through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

      Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

      On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 12 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

      How this is measured
      Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

      Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

      Source object · view filing

      Play a game based on Gertrude S Gordon Foundation Xxxxxx0291’s filings →

      More from the funding graph