Skip to content

· Private foundation

Gertrude & William Bernoudy Fnd

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$510k
Granted FY2025still arriving
29
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$50k
Largest
01What it funds
0191% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2025.

Education$765kArts & Culture$320kYouth Development$190kAnimals$180kHealth$180kRecreation & Sports$75kPhilanthropy$30kSocial Science$30kOther$0
02FY2025 · 29 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k6 grants · $30k
  • $10k–50k19 grants · $280k
  • $50k–250k4 grants · $200k
$10,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$6.5M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
METROPOLITAN GOLF FOUNDATION$50,000
HUMANE SOCIETY OF MISSOURI$50,000
ST LOUIS KAPLAN FELDMAN HOLOCAUST$50,000
GIRL SCOUTS OF EASTERN MISSOURI$50,000
SAINT LOUIS SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA$25,000
FAIR ST LOUIS FOUNDATION$25,000
GREAT RIVERS GATEWAY FOUNDATION$20,000
CENTRAL INSTITUTE FOR THE DEAF$20,000
FRANK LLOYD WRIGHT HOME EBSWORTH PARK$20,000
CENTER OF CREATIVE ARTS$20,000
CITY ACADEMY$20,000
KIDSMART$20,000
BEYOND HOUSING$10,000
OPERATION FOOD SEARCH$10,000
SOCIETY FOR THE BLIND & VISUALLY$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY25–25, $10k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $5k → 14%LITTLE BIT FOUNDATION: $5k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

58%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.1M · 16 repeat orgs$800k to everyone else

16 repeat relationships: 0 still active in FY2025, 16 since wound down; 29 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

16
16

Total granted

$1.1M
$290k

Still filing today

0%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 0% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $510k went to new ones.

50%100%’21’23’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’21’23’25
Arts & CultureEducationHealthRecreation & SportsAnimalsHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • WU
    WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY IN ST. LOUIS
    2× · 2021–2023 · $600k
  • HS
    HUMANE SOCIETY OF MISSOURI
    2× · 2021–2023 · $100k
  • GS
    GIRL SCOUTS OF EASTERN MISSOURI
    2× · 2021–2023 · $100k

Funded once

  • SL
    ST. LOUIS KAPLAN FELDMAN
    one grant, 2023 · $50k
  • CC
    COCA CENTER OF CREATIVE ARTS
    one grant, 2021 · $45k
  • LA
    LANDMARKS ASSOCIATION OF ST. LOUIS
    one grant, 2023 · $25k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
St Louis Community Foundation

To promote the possibilities of charitable giving, helping charitable citizens understand how they can effectively provide for the community they love and the causes they care deeply about.

Philanthropy
2
St Louis Science Center Foundation

Support the st. louis science center and its comprehensive array of educational outreach programs to the community in order to increase interest, understanding and enthusiasm for stem (science, technology, engineering and mathematics).

Science & Tech
3
Greater St Louis Inc

Greater st. louis, inc. brings together business and civic leaders to create jobs, drive inclusive economic growth, and increase the st. louis metro area's global competitiveness. we speak with a unified voice, lead with a bold agenda, and…

Community Improvement
4
St Louis Learning Disabilities Association

To provide children with hope, understanding, and compassion so they can reach their full potential.

Human Services
5
The St Louis Children's Choirs

Transforming lives through musical excellence. the goal of the st. louis children's choirs is to empower the youth of st. louis through a rich choral program that helps each young singer realize their full potential - as a musician and as…

—
6
Thomas Jefferson School

Thomas jefferson school engages its students in the education necessary to live as responsible citizens of the world. through the strongest possible college-prepatory program and within a nurturing community, students develop a…

—
7
Mission St Louis

Mission: st. louis empowers individuals for social and economic growth through relationships and opportunity.

Community Improvement
8
St Louis Sports Commission Inc

Foster economic growth and improved quality of life in the st. louis area by producing events, enhancing its national and international image as a premier sports region, and increasing community awareness of the value of sports.

—
9
St Louis Association of Realtors

The association provides knowledge, guidance and resources which enhances members' professionalism and success, supports growth in the area's diverse communities and protects private property rights.

—
10
St Louis Economic Development Partnership

Economic development.

—
11
The Saint Louis Zoo Association

The saint louis zoo association was established to support and enhance the saint louis zoo by providing facilities, funds, and advice. the association provides direct financial support to the zoo for renovations, new facilities, programs,…

Animals
12
Chicago Public Education Fund

The chicago public education fund (the fund) is a nonprofit organization that improves public schools in chicago by investing in the talented educators who lead them.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Operation Food Search Inc; the most unlike its peers is The Frank Lloyd Wright House in Ebsworth Park. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

26 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 26 of the 61 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
26/26
Grantees still filing
5/26
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY IN ST. LOUIS: $600,000 · OtherWASHINGTON UNIVERSITY IN ST. LOUISHUMANE SOCIETY OF MISSOURI: $100,000 · OtherHUMANE SOCIETY OF MISSOURIGIRL SCOUTS OF EASTERN MISSOURI: $100,000 · OtherGIRL SCOUTS OF EASTERN MISSOURICITY ACADEMY: $65,000 · Other+39 more: $735,000 · Other+39 moreSAINT LOUIS SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA: $25,000 · Arts & CultureTHE FRANK LLOYD WRIGHT HOUSE IN EBSWORTH PARK: $20,000 · Arts & CultureCENTER OF CREATIVE ARTS: $20,000 · Arts & CultureST LOUIS SHAKESPEARE FESTIVAL: $10,000 · Arts & CultureRADIO ARTS FOUNDATION: $10,000 · Arts & CultureMETROPOLITAN GOLF FOUNDATION: $50,000 · Recreation & SportsFAIR SAINT LOUIS FOUNDATION: $25,000 · Recreation & SportsCITY ACADEMY INC: $20,000 · EducationCENTRAL INSTITUTE FOR THE DEAF: $20,000 · EducationKIDSMART INC: $20,000 · EducationREADY READERS: $5,000 · EducationLOGOS INC: $5,000 · EducationHUMANE SOCIETY OF MISSOURI: $50,000 · AnimalsANIMAL PROTECTIVE ASSOCIATION OF MISSOURI: $10,000 · AnimalsCANCER SUPPORT COMMUNITY OF GREATER ST LOUIS: $10,000 · HealthST LOUIS SOCIETY FOR THE BLIND: $10,000 · HealthCHADS COALITION FOR MENTAL HEALTH: $5,000 · HealthOPERATION FOOD SEARCH INC: $10,000 · Food & Nutrition
Other$1,600,000Arts & Culture$85,000Recreation & Sports$75,000Education$70,000Animals$60,000Health$25,000Food & Nutrition$10,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetGIRL SCOUTS OF EASTERN MISSOURI INC: $50,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetHUMANE SOCIETY OF MISSOURI: $50,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetSAINT LOUIS SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA: $25,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCITY ACADEMY INC: $20,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetKIDSMART INC: $20,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCENTER OF CREATIVE ARTS: $20,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetOPERATION FOOD SEARCH INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCANCER SUPPORT COMMUNITY OF GREATER ST LOUIS: $10,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetST LOUIS MERCANTILE LIBRARY ASSOCIATION: $10,000 over 1y, 29% of budgetANIMAL PROTECTIVE ASSOCIATION OF MISSOURI: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetST LOUIS SHAKESPEARE FESTIVAL: $10,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetUNITED WAY OF GREATER ST LOUIS INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCHADS COALITION FOR MENTAL HEALTH: $5,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetREADY READERS: $5,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE LITTLE BIT FOUNDATION: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSPECIAL EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $5,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds METROPOLITAN GOLF FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds GIRL SCOUTS OF EASTERN MISSOURI INC ↗
  • Who funds HUMANE SOCIETY OF MISSOURI ↗
  • Who funds SAINT LOUIS SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA ↗
  • Who funds FAIR SAINT LOUIS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds CITY ACADEMY INC ↗
  • Who funds THE FRANK LLOYD WRIGHT HOUSE IN EBSWORTH PARK ↗
  • Who funds CENTRAL INSTITUTE FOR THE DEAF ↗
  • Who funds KIDSMART INC ↗
  • Who funds CENTER OF CREATIVE ARTS ↗
  • Who funds OPERATION FOOD SEARCH INC ↗
  • Who funds DONALD DANFORTH PLANT SCIENCE CENTER ↗
  • Who funds CANCER SUPPORT COMMUNITY OF GREATER ST LOUIS ↗
  • Who funds ST LOUIS MERCANTILE LIBRARY ASSOCIATION ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

St Louis Community Foundation IncMO29.3× affinity12 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: St Louis Community Foundation Inc · Commerce Bancshares Foundation · United Way of Greater St Louis Inc · Edward Jones Foundation · Centene Foundation · World Wide Technology Foundation · Pershing Charitable Trust · Sam and Marilyn Fox Foundation · Brown Dana Charitable Trust · Moneta Group Charitable Foundation · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Edward Jones Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Gertrude & William Bernoudy Fnd funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Gertrude & William Bernoudy Fnd. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%2%8%17%30%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    8report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 61 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Gertrude & William Bernoudy Fnd’s filings →

    More from the funding graph