· Private foundation
Gerald L & Kathleen a Weiner Foundation
Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).
A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 90% of GERALD L & KATHLEEN A WEINER FOUNDATION’s grantee dollars fall outside its nine largest cause areas, whether because the recipient carries no IRS cause code or because its cause sits in the long tail. A chart would be mostly one residual band and misrepresent the portfolio.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k9 grants · $15k
- $10k–50k1 grant · $12k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| Individual grant recipient | $12,100 |
| IOWANS SUPPORTING ISRAEL | $6,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $5,600 |
| FOOD BANK OF SIOUXLAND | $1,000 |
| THE SALVATION ARMY OF SIOUXLAND | $600 |
| Individual grant recipient | $500 |
| LEMARS BIBLE CHURCH | $500 |
| BOYS & GIRLS HOME OF SIOUX CITY | $200 |
| AMERICAN RED CROSS | $100 |
| YELLOW DOG AUCTION CLUB | $50 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY21–24, $3k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +30% since the first grant, against +2% for the ones you funded once.
15 repeat relationships — 6 still active in FY2024, 9 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 95% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- FBFOOD BANK OF SIOUXLAND INC5× · 2019–2024 · $7k · revenue +91%
- SCSIOUX CITY COMMUNITY THEATER2× · 2020–2021 · $4k · revenue +30%
- SDSOUTH DAKOTA SHERIFFS ASSOCIATION4× · 2019–2023 · $500 · revenue +31%
Funded once
- SCSIOUX CITY POLICE DEPARTMENTone grant, 2019 · $4k
- SSAFEPLACEone grant, 2020 · $3k · revenue -4%
- SSSIOUXLAND SENIOR CENTERone grant, 2021 · $3k · revenue +2%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To eliminate hunger in south dakota.
Representing the interest of retail businesses who sell retail products and services throughout the state of south dakota.
Provide services and programs that promote humane treatment of animals in the siouxland area. the organization operates a shelter, adopts animals to the public, promotes the spay/neuter of pets, provides educational programs and materials…
The siouxland community foundation is a trusted organization that connects people who care with causes that matter by providing a means to receive gifts and distribute grants in response to community needs.
Inspiring and empowering our community through health equity for all.
The south dakota state medical association is devoted to promoting the art and science of medicine; protecting and improving the health of the public; and providing leadership and advocacy in the filed of quality healthcare.
The foundation is dedicated to supporting medical and health education in the siouxland community through education, outreach, community programs, and partnerships that promote public health and wellness.
The sioux falls state theatre company is a 501(c)(3) organization with a mission to preserve a historic landmark and provide community access to a unique state-of-the-art entertainment and education venue. the renovated state theatre will…
Southeastern north dakota community action agency (sendcaa) was formed in 1965 to provide a range of services and activities in a six county area designed to alleviate poverty and give low-income people the opportunity to improve their…
Southeast iowa regional medical center is dedicated to improving the region's health by providing high-quality care, world-class customer service, and uncompromising value for our patients and their families.
Supporting libraries through delivery of professional expertise and sustainable services.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Siouxland Senior Center and the most unlike its peers is Orpheum Theatre Preservation Projectltd. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
17 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 17 of the 33 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds FOOD BANK OF SIOUXLAND INC ↗
- Who funds SIOUX CITY COMMUNITY THEATER ↗
- Who funds SAFEPLACE ↗
- Who funds SIOUXLAND SENIOR CENTER ↗
- Who funds NATIONAL SCLERODERMA FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds KATAHDIN FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds ORPHEUM THEATRE PRESERVATION PROJECTLTD ↗
- Who funds NATIONAL MUSIC MUSEUM (AMERICAS SHRINE TO MUSIC) ↗
- Who funds MARINE TOYS FOR TOTS FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds SOUTH DAKOTA SHERIFFS ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds BOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF SIOUXLAND INC ↗
- Who funds HEALTH INC HOSPICE ↗
- Who funds SIOUXLAND COMMUNITY SOUP KITCHEN ↗
- Who funds SPECIAL TROOPERS ADAPTIVE RIDING SCHOOL RIDING SCHOOL STARS ↗
- Who funds MAYO CLINIC ↗
- Who funds FOOD BANK OF THE ROCKIES ↗
- Who funds American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Missouri River Historical Development Inc · Siouxland Community Foundation · Berenstein Family Foundation · Ronald B and Joan B Krage Foundation · Peterson Family Foundation · The Chesterman Family Foundation · Waitt Foundation · Baird Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Gerald L & Kathleen a Weiner Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Gerald L & Kathleen a Weiner Foundation?
Find your warmest path to Gerald L & Kathleen a Weiner Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.