Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Gerald J Kostelny and Carolyn C Kostelny Charitable Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$46k
Granted FY2024still arriving
14
Grants FY2024still arriving
8
States reached
$13k
Largest
01What you fund
0194% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172024.

Arts & Culture$166kReligion$93kHuman Services$21kEducation$19kHealth$18kInternational$14kPublic Safety & Disaster$9kHousing & Shelter$4kOther$0
02FY2024 · 14 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k13 grants · $33k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $13k
$3,500
Median grant
8
States reached
$536k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ROCK AND ROLL HALL OF FAME$12,500
ALZHEIMER'S ASSOCIATION$5,000
AMERICAN RED CROSS$5,000
ST ISAAC JOGUES CHURCH$5,000
ST MARY STAR OF THE SEA PARISH$5,000
KEY WEST RETIRED CATHOLIC PRIEST FUND$5,000
MICHELLE'S FOUNDATION$3,500
WESLEY HOUSE FAMILY SERVICES$1,035
Individual grant recipient$1,000
NEWPORT PRESERVATION SOCIETY$1,000
THE SALVATION ARMY$1,000
ST LOUIS CATHEDRAL PRESERVATION$433
VFW$250
MARIANIST MISSION$100
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY18–24, $9k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 89% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%WESLEY HOUSE FAMILY SERVICES: $5k → 13%COMMUNITY HOUSE: $1k → 7%WESLEY HOUSE FAMILY SERVICES: $1k → 13%WESLEY HOUSE FAMILY SERVICES: $1k → 13%COVENANT HOUSE ILLINOIS: $622 → 14%COVENANT HOUSE ILLINOIS: $100 → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

NH
IL
WI
NY
MA
SD
IA
IN
OH
CT
RI
CA
MO
VA
MD
TN
NC
DC
LA
MS
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

94%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$333k · 32 repeat orgs$21k to everyone else

32 repeat relationships — 12 still active in FY2024, 20 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

32
32

Total granted

$333k
$16k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+22%
+82%

Still filing today

47%
31%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 88% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $5k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
HealthInternationalHuman ServicesEducationPhilanthropyArts & CultureOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TR
    THE ROCK AND ROLL HALL OF FAME AND MUSEUM INC
    3× · 2019–2024 · $160k · revenue +77%
  • SP
    SAMARITAN'S PURSE
    4× · 2017–2023 · $13k · revenue +134%
  • BT
    BREAKTHROUGH T1D
    2× · 2017–2018 · $10k · revenue +49%

Funded once

  • BS
    BASILLICA SCHOOL OF ST MARY
    one grant, 2020 · $5k
  • OL
    OUR LADY OF MT CARMEL CHURCH
    one grant, 2019 · $2k
  • AO
    ARCHDIOCESE OF CHICAGO
    one grant, 2022 · $2k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Susan G Komen Breast Cancer Fdn Group

Susan g. komen 's mission is to save lives by meeting the most critical needs in our communities & investing in breakthrough research to prevent & cure breast cancer.

2
New York University

Nyu is a private university with approximately 60,000 matriculating students in 20 schools and institutes. nyu's primary missions are education, research and scholarship, and patient care.

Education
3
The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia

The children's hospital of philadelphia, the oldest hospital in the united states dedicated exclusively to pediatrics, strives to be the world leader in the advancement of health care for children by integrating excellent patient care,…

Health
4
New York Genome Center Inc

Operate a state-of-the-art, world-class genomic research center that creates and uses advanced genomics to understand the genetic basis of disease. for more information, see schedule o.

Health
5
The Population Council Inc

We generate ideas, produce evidence, and design solutions to improve the lives of underserved populations around the world. we take a multidisciplinary, intergenerational, life-cycle approach that contributes to (see schedule o)four global…

International
6
Target Als Foundation Inc

Our mission is to break down barriers to als research to find effective treatments. by uniting academia, the pharma and biotech industry, government, venture capital, related nonprofits, and the als community, we aim to overcome the…

Education
7
Conservation International Foundation

Ci works to spotlight and secure the critical benefits that nature provides to humanity.

Environment
8
Children's Health Care

We champion the health needs of children and families. we are committed to improving children's health by providing the highest-quality, family centered care, advanced through research and education.

Health
9
Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center

Leadership in the prevention, treatment, and cure of cancer through excellence, vision and cost effectiveness in patient care, outreach programs, research, and education.

Health
10
Sanford Burnham Prebys Medical Discovery Institute

Sanford burnham prebys medical discovery institute's mission is to advance the biomedical sciences by cultivating the next generation of scientific leaders, providing meaningful opportunities for researchers of all backgrounds to learn,…

Health
11
Global Down Syndrome Foundation

To significantly improve the lives of people with down syndrome through research, medical care, education and advocacy. an important part of this mission is to support the global affiliate organizations that we helped establish and…

Health
12
The Johns Hopkins Hospital

For more than 125 years, the mission of the johns hopkins hospital has been to lead the world in the diagnosis and treatment of disease and to train tomorrow's great physicians, nurses and scientists. above all, we aim to provide the…

Health

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Save the Children Federation Inc and the most unlike its peers is Michelle's Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyCancer Support OrganizationsRotary Club FoundationsFaith-Based Liberal Arts Co…Animal Rescue and AdoptionPregnancy Support ServicesLand Conservation Organizat…Veteran Support ServicesChild and Family Services
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 52 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number22%3%<5yr14%7%5–10yr19%7%10–20yr16%10%20–35yr13%27%35–55yr16%47%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value22%2%<5yr14%1%5–10yr19%5%10–20yr16%1%20–35yr13%83%35–55yr16%9%55yr+

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 3% of your grantees by number, and just 2% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/37
the rest of the field
13%
240,396/1,819,528

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

26 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 26 of the 67 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
26/26
Grantees still filing
19/26
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

THE ROCK AND ROLL HALL OF FAME AND MUSEUM INC — $160,000 · Arts & CultureTHE ROCK AND ROLL HALL OF FAME AND MUSEUM INCST MARY STAR OF THE SEA PARISH — $34,500 · OtherST MARY STAR OF THE SEA PARISHST ISAAC JOGUES CHURCH — $30,500 · OtherST ISAAC JOGUES CHURCHTHE SALVATION ARMY — $11,090 · OtherTHE SALVATION ARMYDIOCESE OF JOLIET (TOY DRIVE) — $10,463 · OtherDIOCESE OF JOLIET (TOY DRIVE)MOTHER MCAULEY LIBERAL ARTS HIGH SCHOOL — $7,000 · OtherNEWPORT PRESERVATION SOCIETY — $6,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient — $6,000 · OtherKEY WEST RETIRED CATHOLIC PRIESTS FUND INC — $5,000 · OtherBASILLICA SCHOOL OF ST MARY — $5,000 · Other+40 more — $23,831 · Other+40 moreAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches — $9,000 · Human ServicesWESLEY HOUSE FAMILY SERVICES INC — $7,276 · Human ServicesTHE COMMUNITY HOUSE — $1,000 · Human ServicesCOVENANT HOUSE ILLINOIS INC — $722 · Human ServicesBREAKTHROUGH T1D — $10,100 · HealthALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC — $6,000 · Health+3 more — $1,025 · HealthSAMARITAN'S PURSE — $13,000 · ReligionMICHELLE'S FOUNDATION INC — $5,100 · EducationXAVIER UNIVERSITY — $1,000 · EducationSTEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION — $234 · EducationMercy Ships International — $500 · InternationalSave The Children Federation Inc — $122 · InternationalCHRISTIAN RELIEF SERVICES INC — $100 · InternationalUNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF — $25 · International
Arts & Culture$160,000Other$139,384Human Services$17,998Health$17,125Religion$13,000Education$6,334International$747

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetTHE ROCK AND ROLL HALL OF FAME AND MUSEUM INC — $160,000 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetSAMARITAN'S PURSE — $13,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetBREAKTHROUGH T1D — $10,100 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches — $9,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetWESLEY HOUSE FAMILY SERVICES INC — $7,276 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC — $6,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMICHELLE'S FOUNDATION INC — $5,100 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetHOUSING OPPORTUNITIES AND MAINTENANCE FOR THE ELDERLY INC — $2,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHE COMMUNITY HOUSE — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetXAVIER UNIVERSITY — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCOVENANT HOUSE ILLINOIS INC — $722 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS — $600 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetNETWORK FOR GOOD — $515 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCARING NETWORK NFP — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMercy Ships International — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFRIENDS OF NOTRE-DAME DE PARIS INC — $350 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetPRIESTS FOR LIFE — $300 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSTEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION — $234 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN MACULAR DEGENERATION GOEHRING — $200 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetWORLD WILDLIFE FUND INC — $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSave The Children Federation Inc — $122 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetThe American Legion — $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCHRISTIAN RELIEF SERVICES INC — $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetThe Susan G Komen Breast Cancer Foundation Inc — $25 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF — $25 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THE ROCK AND ROLL HALL OF FAME AND MUSEUM INC
  • Who funds SAMARITAN'S PURSE
  • Who funds BREAKTHROUGH T1D
  • Who funds American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches
  • Who funds WESLEY HOUSE FAMILY SERVICES INC
  • Who funds ALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC
  • Who funds MICHELLE'S FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds HOUSING OPPORTUNITIES AND MAINTENANCE FOR THE ELDERLY INC
  • Who funds THE COMMUNITY HOUSE
  • Who funds XAVIER UNIVERSITY
  • Who funds COVENANT HOUSE ILLINOIS INC
  • Who funds THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS
  • Who funds NETWORK FOR GOOD
  • Who funds CARING NETWORK NFP
  • Who funds Mercy Ships International
  • Who funds ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF NOTRE-DAME DE PARIS INC
  • Who funds PRIESTS FOR LIFE

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

B & R Charitable Foundation IncTN17.8× affinity6 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: B & R Charitable Foundation Inc · The Whelan Family Foundation Inc · The A&S Giancristofaro Family Foundation Inc · Alexander and Linda Milley Foundation · David E & Mary C Gallo Foundation · The Halprin Family Foundation B · Friel Foundation Inc · The Salem Foundation · The Pittsburgh Foundation · American Endowment Foundation · Arthur J Gallagher Foundation · AbbVie Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Gerald J Kostelny and Carolyn C Kostelny Charitable Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 30%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 30%
  • Save the Children Federation Inc30% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
3get no government money at all
7report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 67 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph