Loading…
· Public charity
GEORGIANS FOR A HEALTHY FUTURE INC
The mission of Georgians for a Healthy Future is to collaborate with communities and partners to lead policy change that advances health equity for all Georgians.
$240k
Granted FY2024
6
Grants
1
Communities
$65k
Largest
01What you fund
0182% classified
What you funded, over time
Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY2020–2024.
Civil Rights$406kHuman Services$135kPhilanthropy$75kArts & Culture$30kCommunity Improvement$13kOther$145k
02beneath the categories
Past the labels — and the year it shifted
Beneath the NTEE codes, this is what the grant descriptions actually say.
…and in their own words, year by year
2020
counselingsocialtraininginformation
2021
counselingsocialpoliticalinformationtrainingpower marginalized
2022
social
2023
subgrant
2024
protect advanceadvance careoutreach
Words distinctive to each year’s grant purposes (TF-IDF) · event-driven terms in cyan.
03FY2024 · 6 grants
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- $10k–50k3 grants · $63k
- $50k–250k3 grants · $178k
$50,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$1.5M
Total assets
Largest grants
- EQUALITY FOUNDATION OF GA$65,000
- BVM CAPACITY BUILDING INSTITU$62,500
- 9-5 NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF$50,000
- GA ALLIANCE OF YMCAS$25,323
- LATINO COMMUITY FUND INC$25,000
- HEALTHY MOTHERS HEALTHY BABI$12,500
02The need
04
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
show:
Your human-services grants (FY20–24, $135k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14% — the area typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
03Your edge
repeat funding
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
73%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$583k · 5 repeat orgs$221k to everyone else
5 repeat relationships — 2 still active in FY2024, 3 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Re-uppedFunded once
Organizations
5
4
Total granted
$583k
$108k
Median revenue growth · since first grant
+119%
+615%
Still filing today
100%
75%
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 53% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $113k went to new ones.
RenewedFirst-time
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
Human ServicesCivil RightsPhilanthropyArts & CultureCommunity ImprovementOther
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- BCBVM CAPACITY BUILDING INSTITU4× · 2020–2024 · $221k · revenue +1062%
- EFEQUALITY FOUNDATION OF GA4× · 2020–2024 · $186k · revenue +39%
- NGNAMI GEORGIA INC2× · 2022–2023 · $90k · revenue +119%
Funded once
- TATHE ARC OF THE UNITED STATESgraduatedone grant, 2020 · $53k · revenue +38%
- STSILENCE THE SHAMEgraduatedone grant, 2023 · $30k · revenue +2626%
- SRSOWEGA RISINGgraduatedone grant, 2021 · $13k · revenue +615%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
04Your field
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
1
Georgia Economic Development
The foundation functions as an advocate of economic development for the state of georgia.
Community Improvement
2
Transforming Georgia Inc
Transforming Georgia, Inc. is organized to make an indelible impact on the lives of Georgians through fighting for voting rights, supporting legislative solutions, programs and other proactive efforts to transform our communities.
Civil Rights
3
Georgia Center for Child Advocacy Inc
The Georgia center for child advocacy's mission is to champion the needs of sexually and severely physically abused children through prevention, intervention, therapy, and collaboration.
Human Services
4
Georgia Health Initiative Inc
Philanthropy
5
Georgia Alliance for Breast Cancer
Support Georgians by raising money for breast health and breast cancer programs.
Health
6
Asian Americans Advancing Justice
Asian Americans Advancing Justice - Atlanta's mission is to protect and promote the civil and human rights of Asian Americans, Native Hawaiians, and Pacific Islanders in Georgia and the Southeast through policy advocacy, legal services,…
Human Services
7
Georgia Healthy Family Alliance Inc
The mission of the georgia healthy family alliance (ghfa) is to serve the people of georgia by enhancing their well-being through educational and outreach programs that promote healthy practices consistent with the principles of family…
Education
8
Georgia Coalition Against Domestic
Collaborate. advocate. educate. empower. we empower survivors and the programs that serve them. we educate the public, and we advocate for responsive public policy. our strength is in numbers, as we collaborate through georgia to stop…
—
9
Medical Association of Georgia
The foundation is a public charity enabling georgia physicians to support and engage in charitable and educational projects affecting medicine and public health.
Health
10
East Georgia Cancer Coalition
Cancer Prevention Education Provide the region with prevention education and information, early detection methodologies, referrals, and follow-up
Education
11
Georgia Strong Committee
Promote social welfare of Georgia communities through events that celebrate the history, culture, and constitutional framework of the state of Georgia, and educating opinion leaders and the public on on economic development in Georgia and…
—
12
Atlanta Association of Legal
—
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Nami Georgia Inc and the most unlike its peers is Candid. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network
12 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.
0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
12/12
Grantees still filing
10/12
Grew since you first funded
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Civil Rights$406,400Other$145,050Human Services$135,223Philanthropy$75,000Arts & Culture$30,000Community Improvement$13,000
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds BVM CAPACITY BUILDING INSTITU ↗
- Who funds EQUALITY FOUNDATION OF GA ↗
- Who funds NAMI GEORGIA INC ↗
- Who funds GEORGIA COUNCIL ON SUBSTANCE ↗
- Who funds THE ARC OF THE UNITED STATES ↗
- Who funds 9-5 NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF ↗
- Who funds CENTER FOR PAN ASIAN COMMUNIT ↗
- Who funds SILENCE THE SHAME ↗
- Who funds GA ALLIANCE OF YMCAS ↗
- Who funds LATINO COMMUITY FUND INC ↗
- Who funds SOWEGA RISING ↗
- Who funds HEALTHY MOTHERS HEALTHY BABI ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
The Community Foundation for GreaterGA20.9× affinity8 shared granteesties to 10 of 10Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →
Open a dossier: The Community Foundation for Greater · United Way of Greater Atlanta Inc · Georgia Health Initiative Inc · Tides Foundation · Kaiser Foundation Health Plan of Georgiainc · Charities Aid Foundation America · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organisation GEORGIANS FOR A HEALTHY FUTURE INC funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
2025
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–60%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
05Through Plinth
Through Plinth
Your grantmaking, live and operational
This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: SOWEGA RISING.
Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk
Financial management
low risk
~8 months of operating runway; revenue grew over 5 filed years.
Track record & reputation
low risk
5 years of Form 990 filings, still active; revenue up 7.2× since.
Legal standing
low risk
US 501(c)(3); EIN 832761941 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.
Governance
Live in Plinth
Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.
Compliance & sanctions
Live in Plinth
OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.
Program capacity
Live in Plinth
Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.
Live · Plinth’s real DD engine
Run the actual assessment on SOWEGA RISING, cold from public data.
Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.
Post-award monitoring · continuous checks
- On trackFinancial stability— Roughly 8 months of cash on hand.
- On trackSustained operations— Filing through 2024; revenue grew over the period.
- On trackReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 5% of their budget — diversified.
- Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.
What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.
Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing
Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro
How do I get to Georgians for a Healthy Future Inc?
Find your warmest path to Georgians for a Healthy Future Inc through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.
Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.
More from the funding graph
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars pass through an intermediary
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
Strange bedfellows
the named clusters of US funding
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home
State money flows
the interactive map of money crossing state lines