Skip to content
Georgetown Healthcare System Inc at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

Georgetown Healthcare System Inc

To generate and accelerate positive change in the health of the community of georgetown and the surrounding area.

$2.4M
Granted FY2024still arriving
35
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$599k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Health$6.3MHuman Services$3.9MCommunity Improvement$1.8MYouth Development$1.5MPublic Benefit$799kEmployment$688kEducation$552kHousing & Shelter$472kOther$0
02FY2024 · 35 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 35 grants below total $2,284,550, the rows itemized in this filing. The $2,378,707 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $94,157 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k2 grants · $14k
  • $10k–50k17 grants · $291k
  • $50k–250k15 grants · $1.4M
  • $250k+1 grant · $599k
$40,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$60M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
LONE STAR CIRCLE OF CARE$599,000
TEXAS BAPTIST CHILDREN'S HOME$225,000
STARRY$208,500
YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF GREATER WILLIAMSON COUNTY$152,000
UNITED WAY FOR GREATER AUSTIN$125,000
THE GEORGETOWN PROJECT$90,000
GEORGETOWN CARING PLACE$90,000
GEORGETOWN BACKPACK BUDDIES$75,000
WILLIAMSON COUNTY CHILDREN'S ADVOCACY CENTER$60,000
HABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF WILLIAMSON COUNTY TEXAS$55,000
OPPORTUNITIES FOR WILLIAMSON-BURNET COUNTIES$50,000
WILLIAMSON COUNTY CRISIS CENTER DBA HOPE ALLIANCE$50,000
ROCK$50,000
FAITH IN ACTION$50,000
SAMARITAN CENTER FOR COUNSELING & PASTORAL CARE$50,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–24, $2.0M) land where the poverty rate runs at 7%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 18% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%FII-NATIONAL: $35k → 10%GRANTMAKERS IN AGING: $20k → 9%LADDERS FOR LEADERS: $9k → 6%FAITH IN ACTION - GEORGETOWN: $58k → 6%FAITH IN ACTION - GEORGETOWN: $50k → 6%FAITH IN ACTION - GEORGETOWN: $50k → 6%AUSTIN GROUPS FOR THE ELDERLY: $30k → 10%FAITH IN ACTION: $50k → 6%AUSTIN GROUPS FOR THE ELDERLY: $30k → 10%FAITH IN ACTION - GEORGETOWN: $50k → 6%AUSTIN GROUPS FOR THE ELDERLY: $30k → 10%FAITH IN ACTION - GEORGETOWN: $50k → 6%AUSTIN GROUPS FOR THE ELDERLY: $30k → 10%FAITH IN ACTION - GEORGETOWN: $40k → 6%AUSTIN GROUPS FOR THE ELDERLYDBA AGE OF CENTRAL TEXAS: $10k → 10%FOSTERING HOPE AUSTIN: $15k → 6%TEXAS BAPTIST CHILDREN'S HOME INC: $252k → 6%TEXAS BAPTIST CHILDREN'S HOME: $225k → 6%TEXAS BAPTIST CHILDREN'S HOME INC: $59k → 6%GENAUSTIN: $15k → 10%TEXAS BAPTIST CHILDREN'S HOME INC: $53k → 6%TEXAS BAPTIST CHILDREN'S HOME: $40k → 6%TEXAS BAPTIST CHILDREN'S HOME INC: $36k → 6%TEXAS BAPTIST CHILDREN'S HOME INC: $25k → 6%WONDERS & WORRIES: $9k → 10%CAPITAL INVESTING IN DEVELOPMENT AND EMPLOYMENT OF ADULTS INC: $50k → 10%FAMILY ELDERCARE INC: $9k → 10%CAPITAL INVESTING IN DEVELOPMENT AND EMPLOYMENT OF ADULTS INC: $50k → 10%FAMILY ELDERCARE INC: $9k → 10%FAMILY ELDERCARE INC: $8k → 10%FAMILY ELDERCARE INC: $8k → 10%OPPORTUNITIES FOR WILLIAMSON & BURNET COUNTIES: $65k → 6%WILLIAMSON BURNET COUNTY OPPORTUNITIES INC (WBCO): $60k → 6%OPPORTUNITIES FOR WILLIAMSON & BURNET COUNTIES: $53k → 6%OPPORTUNITIES FOR WILLIAMSON-BURNET COUNTIES: $50k → 6%OPPORTUNITIES FOR WILLIAMSON & BURNET COUNTIES: $50k → 6%OPPORTUNITIES FOR WILLIAMSON & BURNET COUNTIES: $40k → 6%BROOKWOOD IN GEORGETOWN VOCATIONAL INC: $30k → 6%CHILDREN AT HEART MINISTRIES: $28k → 6%BROOKWOOD IN GEORGETOWN VOCATIONAL INC: $25k → 6%BROOKWOOD IN GEORGETOWN VOCATIONAL INC: $25k → 6%BROOKWOOD IN GEORGETOWN VOCATIONAL INC: $25k → 6%CHILDREN AT HEART MINISTRIES: $23k → 6%WILLIAMSON BURNET COUNTY OPPORTUNITIES INC (WBCO): $20k → 6%BROOKWOOD IN GEORGETOWN: $18k → 6%BROOKWOOD IN GEORGETOWN VOCATIONAL INC: $10k → 6%WONDERS & WORRIES: $9k → 6%WONDERS & WORRIES: $8k → 6%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 41% of Georgetown Healthcare System Inc’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address.

Georgetown Healthcare System Inclessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

97%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$17M · 54 repeat orgs$490k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +38% since the first grant, against +7% for those funded once.

54 repeat relationships: 31 still active in FY2024, 23 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

54
21

Total granted

$17M
$464k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+38%
+7%

Still filing today

85%
57%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 99% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $26k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesHealthEducationYouth DevelopmentCrime & LegalFood & NutritionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • LS
    LONE STAR CIRCLE OF CARE
    8× · 2017–2024 · $4.3M · revenue +29%
  • TG
    The Georgetown Project
    8× · 2017–2024 · $822k · revenue +187% · 43% of their budget
  • GC
    GEORGETOWN CARING PLACE
    8× · 2017–2024 · $793k · revenue +56%

Funded once

  • BT
    BLUEBONNET TRAILS COMMUNITY MHMR CENTER
    one grant, 2018 · $227k
  • LS
    LONE STAR JUSTICE ALLIANCEgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $50k · revenue +126%
  • FII - NATIONAL
    one grant, 2020 · $35k · revenue -92%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Texans Care for Children Inc

Texans Care for Children shapes public policies and brings Texans together to make children a statewide priority. We work so kids can have what they need to be healthy, secure, and thriving and so every Texan can have the best start to…

Crime & Legal
2
Central Texas Children's Home

To provide family services and to provide residential child care for dependent children where there is a need to assist children and families disrupted by problems.

Human Services
3
Austin Child Guidance Center

To improve the mental health of children and their families through early intervention, diagnosis, and treatment to help them develop the emotional skills for meeting life's challenges.

—
4
Texas Community Counseling

When care is within reach, lives change. Texas Community Counseling is a faith-based nonprofit committed to bringing hope and healing through mental health care to the communities that need it the most. We empower individuals to heal,…

Human Services
5
Leadership Austin

Leadership austin connects and develops leaders to courageously engage and transform our communities.

Youth Development
6
Crisis Assistance Center Inc dba Community Assistance Center

To provide emergency assistance to people in Montgomery County, TX who are in an unexpected crisis.

Human Services
7
Good Work Austin

Good Work Austin's mission is to foster healthy careers in the local food and beverage industry through professional development and advocacy for more equitable practices.

Public Benefit
8
FIRST3YEARS

First3years nurtures early relational and mental health of infants and toddlers in texas. working in deep collaboration with caregivers, parents, and professionals statewide, we cultivate strong early childhood systems, educate our…

—
9
Tip of Texas Family Outreach Inc

To strengthen families through parenting classes educational programs, youth programs and referral services for the prevention of child abuse and neglect.

—
10
Guadalupe County Children's Advocacy Center

To advocate for and provide services to children and families when there are allegations of abuse and neglect throughout the investigation,prosecution, treatment, and prevention of child abuse, and to reduce the trauma to childrent with…

Crime & Legal
11
Texprotects-the Texas Association for the Protection of Children

TexProtects advances public policy and local implementation to strenghten families to prevent child abuse and neglect.

Youth Development
12
Raise Texas

RAISE Texas advances equitable policies and programs that foster financial security and economic mobility for low- and moderate-income Texans. We equip, innovate and advocate to reduce disparities, remove barriers and build opportunities…

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Community Action Inc of Central Texas; the most unlike its peers is White Tower Holdings. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

68 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 68 of the 81 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

3
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
17
Early backer (in before they grew)
63/68
Grantees still filing
52/68
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

LONE STAR CIRCLE OF CARE: $4,342,000 · HealthLONE STAR CIRCLE OF CAREThe Georgetown Project: $821,580 · HealthThe Georgetown ProjectST DAVID'S FOUNDATION COMMUNITY FUND: $280,000 · Health+5 more: $62,495 · HealthGEORGETOWN INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT (GISD): $584,500 · OtherGEORGETOWN INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT …CITY OF GEORGETOWN PARKS AND REC: $550,000 · OtherCITY OF GEORGETOWN PARKS AND RECWILLIAMSON COUNTY CRISIS CENTER: $497,200 · OtherWILLIAMSON COUNTY CRISIS CENTERHABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF WILLIAMSON COUNTY TEXAS INC: $472,000 · OtherHABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF WILLIAMSON COUN…Samaritan Center for Counseling and Pastoral Care Inc: $389,290 · OtherSamaritan Center for Counseling and Pas…YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF CENTRAL TEXAS: $362,000 · OtherYOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF CE…Catholic Charities of Central Texas: $290,000 · OtherANY BABY CAN OF AUSTIN INC: $243,760 · OtherBLUEBONNET TRAILS COMMUNITY MHMR CENTER: $227,400 · OtherCHRISTI CENTER: $206,790 · OtherGOODWILL INDUSTRIES OF CENTRAL TEXAS: $526,778 · OtherGOODWILL INDUSTRIES OF CENTRAL TEXASROCK RIDE ON CENTER FOR KIDS INC: $404,500 · OtherROCK RIDE ON CENTER FOR KIDS INCWILLIAMSON COUNTY CHILDREN'S ADVOCACY CENTER INC: $259,000 · Other+30 more: $1,059,665 · Other+30 moreTEXAS BAPTIST CHILDREN'S HOME INC: $689,475 · Human ServicesTEXAS BAPTIST…FAITH IN ACTION GEORGETOWN: $373,339 · Human ServicesFAITH IN ACTI…WILLIAMSON-BURNET COUNTY OPPORTUNITIES INC: $337,818 · Human ServicesWILLIAMSON-BU…AUSTIN GROUPS FOR THE ELDERLY: $140,000 · Human ServicesAUSTIN GROUPS…BROOKWOOD IN GEORGETOWN VOCATIONAL INC: $133,000 · Human ServicesBROOKWOOD IN …Capital Investing in Development and Employment of Adults Inc: $100,000 · Human Services+11 more: $326,720 · Human Services+11 moreGEORGETOWN CARING PLACE: $792,750 · Community ImprovementGEORGETOWN…STARRY Inc: $766,168 · Community ImprovementSTARRY IncGTX Connect: $798,560 · Public BenefitUNITED WAY FOR GREATER AUSTIN: $290,000 · PhilanthropyGeorgetown Backpack Buddies: $269,000 · PhilanthropyGEORGETOWN AREA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $92,320 · PhilanthropyCENTRAL TEXAS COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $45,000 · Philanthropy+2 more: $22,500 · PhilanthropyBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF GEORGETOWN: $628,050 · Youth Development+3 more: $27,500 · Youth Development
Health$5,506,075Other$6,072,883Human Services$2,100,352Community Improvement$1,558,918Public Benefit$798,560Philanthropy$718,820Youth Development$655,550

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetLONE STAR CIRCLE OF CARE: $4,342,000 over 8y, 0.7% of budgetThe Georgetown Project: $821,580 over 8y, 43% of budgetGTX Connect: $798,560 over 8y, 89% of budgetGEORGETOWN CARING PLACE: $792,750 over 8y, 5.8% of budgetSTARRY Inc: $766,168 over 8y, 2.7% of budgetTEXAS BAPTIST CHILDREN'S HOME INC: $689,475 over 7y, 6.6% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF GEORGETOWN: $628,050 over 7y, 19% of budgetGOODWILL INDUSTRIES OF CENTRAL TEXAS: $526,778 over 6y, 0.3% of budgetWILLIAMSON COUNTY CRISIS CENTER: $497,200 over 8y, 5.4% of budgetHABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF WILLIAMSON COUNTY TEXAS INC: $472,000 over 8y, 6.2% of budgetROCK RIDE ON CENTER FOR KIDS INC: $404,500 over 8y, 3.7% of budgetSamaritan Center for Counseling and Pastoral Care Inc: $389,290 over 8y, 2.6% of budgetFAITH IN ACTION GEORGETOWN: $373,339 over 8y, 13% of budgetYOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF CENTRAL TEXAS: $362,000 over 8y, 0.4% of budgetWILLIAMSON-BURNET COUNTY OPPORTUNITIES INC: $337,818 over 7y, 0.5% of budgetUNITED WAY FOR GREATER AUSTIN: $290,000 over 3y, 0.6% of budgetCatholic Charities of Central Texas: $290,000 over 5y, 1.4% of budgetST DAVID'S FOUNDATION COMMUNITY FUND: $280,000 over 8y, 7.4% of budgetGeorgetown Backpack Buddies: $269,000 over 5y, 47% of budgetWILLIAMSON COUNTY CHILDREN'S ADVOCACY CENTER INC: $259,000 over 6y, 3.8% of budgetANY BABY CAN OF AUSTIN INC: $243,760 over 8y, 0.4% of budgetCHRISTI CENTER: $206,790 over 8y, 7.6% of budgetAUSTIN GROUPS FOR THE ELDERLY: $140,000 over 7y, 1.5% of budgetBROOKWOOD IN GEORGETOWN VOCATIONAL INC: $133,000 over 6y, 0.6% of budgetLiteracy Council of Williamson County: $131,125 over 6y, 13% of budgetCapital Investing in Development and Employment of Adults Inc: $100,000 over 2y, 1.2% of budgetThe Brookwood Community Inc: $100,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetGEORGETOWN AREA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $92,320 over 4y, 1.5% of budgetCASA of Williamson County Texas: $80,000 over 3y, 7.5% of budgetROTARY INTERNATIONAL GEORGETOWN TX: $58,500 over 8y, 11% of budgetCHILDREN AT HEART MINISTRIES INC: $58,300 over 3y, 0.7% of budgetWonders & Worries Inc: $50,140 over 8y, 0.6% of budgetGIRLSTART: $50,000 over 4y, 1.6% of budgetLONE STAR JUSTICE ALLIANCE: $50,000 over 1y, 4.6% of budgetSPIRIT REINS INC: $45,000 over 2y, 2.3% of budgetCENTRAL TEXAS COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $45,000 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetA GIFT OF TIME - ADULT DAY CARE: $40,000 over 3y, 16% of budgetGEORGETOWN ISD EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $35,250 over 4y, 5.5% of budgetFII - NATIONAL: $35,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMEALS ON WHEELS AND MORE INC: $35,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetFAMILY ELDERCARE INC: $32,280 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetCOMMUNITY ACTION INC OF CENTRAL TEXAS: $31,680 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetSimple Sparrow: $26,000 over 3y, 5.8% of budgetGRANTMAKERS IN AGING INC: $25,000 over 2y, 1.0% of budgetWHITE TOWER HOLDINGS: $25,000 over 3y, 2.6% of budgetImpact Counseling Services Inc: $24,995 over 3y, 0.8% of budgetCHRIST TOGETHER GREATER AUSTIN: $22,500 over 2y, 3.1% of budgetNAMI Central Texas: $20,000 over 1y, 2.5% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds LONE STAR CIRCLE OF CARE ↗
  • Who funds The Georgetown Project ↗
  • Who funds GTX Connect ↗
  • Who funds GEORGETOWN CARING PLACE ↗
  • Who funds STARRY Inc ↗
  • Who funds TEXAS BAPTIST CHILDREN'S HOME INC ↗
  • Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF GEORGETOWN ↗
  • Who funds GOODWILL INDUSTRIES OF CENTRAL TEXAS ↗
  • Who funds WILLIAMSON COUNTY CRISIS CENTER ↗
  • Who funds HABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF WILLIAMSON COUNTY TEXAS INC ↗
  • Who funds ROCK RIDE ON CENTER FOR KIDS INC ↗
  • Who funds Samaritan Center for Counseling and Pastoral Care Inc ↗
  • Who funds FAITH IN ACTION GEORGETOWN ↗
  • Who funds YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF CENTRAL TEXAS ↗
  • Who funds WILLIAMSON-BURNET COUNTY OPPORTUNITIES INC ↗
  • Who funds UNITED WAY FOR GREATER AUSTIN ↗
  • Who funds Catholic Charities of Central Texas ↗
  • Who funds ST DAVID'S FOUNDATION COMMUNITY FUND ↗
  • Who funds Georgetown Backpack Buddies ↗
  • Who funds WILLIAMSON COUNTY CHILDREN'S ADVOCACY CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds ANY BABY CAN OF AUSTIN INC ↗
  • Who funds CHRISTI CENTER ↗
  • Who funds AUSTIN GROUPS FOR THE ELDERLY ↗
  • Who funds BROOKWOOD IN GEORGETOWN VOCATIONAL INC ↗
  • Who funds Literacy Council of Williamson County ↗
  • Who funds Capital Investing in Development and Employment of Adults Inc ↗
  • Who funds The Brookwood Community Inc ↗
  • Who funds GEORGETOWN AREA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds CASA of Williamson County Texas ↗
  • Who funds ROTARY INTERNATIONAL GEORGETOWN TX ↗
  • Who funds CHILDREN AT HEART MINISTRIES INC ↗
  • Who funds Wonders & Worries Inc ↗
  • Who funds GIRLSTART ↗
  • Who funds LONE STAR JUSTICE ALLIANCE ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

St David's FoundationUnited Way for Greate…Georgetown Area Commu…Austin Community Foun…Central Texas Communi…United Way of William…The Moody FoundationW D Kelley FoundationUnited Way WorldwideAscension SetonTopfer Family Foundat…Harry E and Eda L Mon…
St David's FoundationTX67.3× affinity31 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: St David's Foundation · United Way for Greater Austin · Georgetown Area Community Foundation · Austin Community Foundation Inc · Central Texas Community Foundation · United Way of Williamson County · The Moody Foundation · W D Kelley Foundation · United Way Worldwide · Ascension Seton · Topfer Family Foundation · Harry E and Eda L Montandon Charitable Tr

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Georgetown Healthcare System Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Georgetown Healthcare System Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%6%23%51%90%funder's share of their income ↑0%23%45%68%90%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    24report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Georgetown Healthcare System Inc?

    Find your warmest path to Georgetown Healthcare System Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 81 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Georgetown Healthcare System’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home