Skip to content

· Public charity

Georgetown Healthcare Community Services

Provide for the unmet needs of our community, in part by offering space to non-profit organizations at substantially less than fair market value.

$1.3M
Granted FY2024still arriving
2
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$975k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2024.

Health$9.1MEducation$371kCrime & Legal$200kHuman Services$74k
02FY2024 · 2 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 2 grants below total $1,025,000, the rows itemized in this filing. The $1,338,650 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $313,650 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • $50k–250k1 grant · $50k
  • $250k+1 grant · $975k
$975,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$7.9M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
GEORGETOWN HEALTHCARE SYSTEM$975,000
CASA OF WILLIAMSON COUNTY$50,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY23–23, $19k) land where the poverty rate runs at 6%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 7%TEXAS BAPTIST CHILDREN'S HOME INC: $19k → 6%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 98% of Georgetown Healthcare Community Services’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address.

Georgetown Healthcare Community Serviceslessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

100%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$9.7M · 4 repeat orgs$29k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +210% since the first grant, against -6% for those funded once.

4 repeat relationships: 2 still active in FY2024, 2 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

4
3

Total granted

$9.7M
$29k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+210%
-6%

Still filing today

50%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
HealthCrime & LegalHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • GH
    GEORGETOWN HEALTHCARE SYSTEM INC
    7× · 2018–2024 · $7.9M · revenue +53% · 41% of their budget
  • BT
    BLUEBONNET TRAILS COMMUNITY MHMR CENTER
    6× · 2019–2024 · $1.1M
  • OI
    OVERTON INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT
    4× · 2019–2022 · $371k

Funded once

  • TB
    TEXAS BAPTIST CHILDREN'S HOME INC
    2× · 2023–2024 · $19k · revenue +5%
  • IC
    Impact Counseling Services Inc
    2× · 2023–2024 · $5k · revenue -31%
  • SC
    Samaritan Center for Counseling and Pastoral Care Inc
    2× · 2023–2024 · $5k · revenue -6%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Texas Community Counseling

When care is within reach, lives change. Texas Community Counseling is a faith-based nonprofit committed to bringing hope and healing through mental health care to the communities that need it the most. We empower individuals to heal,…

Human Services
2
Central Texas Children's Home

To provide family services and to provide residential child care for dependent children where there is a need to assist children and families disrupted by problems.

Human Services
3
Crisis Assistance Center Inc dba Community Assistance Center

To provide emergency assistance to people in Montgomery County, TX who are in an unexpected crisis.

Human Services
4
The Center for Integrative Counseling and Psychology

Our mission is to provide accessible high-quality counseling, training, psychological evaluations, and educational testing that equip our clients to grow through lifes changes and challenges.

Health
5
El Paso Area Christian Counseling Service

Counseling Services offering hope, healing, and restoration to hurting people, marriages, and families using respected therapy practices and solid biblical principles.

Human Services
6
Childrens Advocacy Center of West Texas Inc

The Organizations mission is to bring unity and efficiency to investigations of child abuse through the use of a multi-disciplinary team and, thereby, to provide the best possible services to victims of child abuse and their families.

Crime & Legal
7
Guadalupe County Children's Advocacy Center

To advocate for and provide services to children and families when there are allegations of abuse and neglect throughout the investigation,prosecution, treatment, and prevention of child abuse, and to reduce the trauma to childrent with…

Crime & Legal
8
Cornerstone Counseling Ctr Chicago

Cornerstone Counseling empowers people to reach their spiritual, relational, and emotional potential through exceptional counseling and personal development services.

—
9
His Story Coaching and Counseling

Christian coaching, counseling, assessment and consulting services to the communities of Tarrant County, Texas.

Human Services
10
Ft Bend County Child Advocates Inc

Fort Bend County Child Advocates, Inc. provides a voice, heals the hurt and breaks the cycle of abuse and neglect for children in Fort Bend County.

Civil Rights
11
Interface Samaritan Counseling Centers

Provide counseling and educational services from a christian perspective. 17 master/ph.d level therapists and psychiatrists with a broad range of licensure provide faith-sensitive services in 8 locations throughout greater houston.

—
12
Child and Family Guidance Center of Texoma

The child and family guidance center of texoma exists to strengthen, improve, and empower the lives of hurting texoma children and families through compassionate and restorative mental healthcare.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Wonders & Worries Inc; the most unlike its peers is Georgetown Texas Group. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/9
Grantees still filing
4/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

GEORGETOWN HEALTHCARE SYSTEM INC: $7,926,392 · HealthGEORGETOWN HEALTHCARE SYSTEM INC+1 more: $5,005 · HealthBLUEBONNET TRAILS COMMUNITY MHMR CENTER: $1,137,000 · OtherBLUEBONNET TRAILS…OVERTON INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT (OISD): $370,500 · OtherOVERTON INDEPENDE…+1 more: $5,005 · OtherCASA of Williamson County Texas: $250,000 · Crime & LegalTEXAS BAPTIST CHILDREN'S HOME INC: $18,800 · Human Services
Health$7,931,397Other$1,512,505Crime & Legal$250,000Human Services$18,800

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%grantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetGEORGETOWN HEALTHCARE SYSTEM INC: $7,926,392 over 7y, 41% of budgetCASA of Williamson County Texas: $250,000 over 5y, 5.7% of budgetTEXAS BAPTIST CHILDREN'S HOME INC: $18,800 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetImpact Counseling Services Inc: $5,005 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetSamaritan Center for Counseling and Pastoral Care Inc: $5,005 over 2y, 0.2% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds GEORGETOWN HEALTHCARE SYSTEM INC ↗
  • Who funds CASA of Williamson County Texas ↗
  • Who funds TEXAS BAPTIST CHILDREN'S HOME INC ↗
  • Who funds Impact Counseling Services Inc ↗
  • Who funds Samaritan Center for Counseling and Pastoral Care Inc ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Georgetown Healthcare System IncTX22.1× affinity8 shared granteesties to 8 of 8Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Georgetown Healthcare System Inc · Central Texas Community Foundation · Austin Community Foundation Inc · St David's Foundation · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Georgetown Healthcare Community Services funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Georgetown Healthcare Community Services. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%3%13%28%50%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Georgetown Healthcare Community Services?

    Find your warmest path to Georgetown Healthcare Community Services through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 7 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Georgetown Healthcare Community Services’ filings →

    More from the funding graph