Skip to content

· Private foundation

George Paul and Grace E Lowrey Charitable Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$41k
Granted FY2025still arriving
14
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$8k
Largest
01What it funds
0193% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$210kHuman Services$50kPublic Benefit$27kRecreation & Sports$23kEnvironment$21kFood & Nutrition$8kArts & Culture$7kReligion$4kOther$0
02FY2025 · 14 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$2,500
Median grant
1
States reached
$789k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ERICSON PUBLIC LIBRARY$8,000
LEONARD A GOOD COMMUNITY LIBRARY$7,373
MADRID PUBLIC LIBRARY$4,000
CITY OF MADRID PARK BOARD$3,000
SACRED HEART SCHOOL$2,833
MADRID COMMUNITY SCHOOLS$2,500
CHILD CARE JUNCTION$2,500
Individual grant recipient$2,500
IOWA ARBORETUM$2,138
Individual grant recipient$1,885
TRINITY LUTHERAN SCHOOL$1,500
FRIENDS OF DON WILLIAMS GOLF COURSE$1,000
ASCENSION PARISH$950
CITY OF BOONE RECREATION$700
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $43k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 32% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%YOUTH & SHELTER SERVICES: $8k → 17%YOUTH & SHELTER SERVICES: $6k → 17%CHILD CARE JUNCTION: $5k → 9%CHILD CARE JUNCTION: $4k → 9%YOUTH & SHELTER SERVICES: $4k → 9%CHILD CARE JUNCTION: $4k → 9%CHILD CARE JUNCTION: $3k → 9%CHILD CARE JUNCTION: $3k → 9%CHILD CARE JUNCTION: $2k → 9%CHILD CARE JUNCTION: $2k → 9%CHILD CARE JUNCTION: $2k → 9%CHILD CARE JUNCTION: $2k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

86%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$318k · 20 repeat orgs$51k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +64% since the first grant, against +11% for those funded once.

20 repeat relationships: 8 still active in FY2025, 12 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

20
14

Total granted

$318k
$41k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+64%
+11%

Still filing today

20%
29%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 77% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $10k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesEducationEnvironmentYouth DevelopmentPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CC
    CHILD CARE JUNCTION INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $25k · revenue +64%
  • YA
    YOUTH AND SHELTER SERVICES INC
    3× · 2018–2022 · $18k · revenue +110%
  • IA
    IOWA ARBORETUM INC
    6× · 2018–2025 · $16k · revenue +46%

Funded once

  • BC
    BOONE CITY PARKS FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2020 · $5k
  • OC
    OGDEN COMM SCHOOLS
    one grant, 2017 · $5k
  • DF
    DMACC FOUNDATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $5k · revenue +62%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Des Moines Golf and Country Club Educational Foundation
—
2
Central Iowa Juvenile Detention Center

To provide a highly structured environment which emphasizes a safety and security to all juveniles while serving as a deterrent to criminal and anti-social behaviors. Working youth in the center and communities.

—
3
Boys & Girls Clubs of Central Iowa

To inspire and enable all young people especially those who need us most to reach their full potential as productive, caring, and responsible citizens.

Youth Development
4
Grand View Child Development Center Inc

Provide affordable child care services to residents of des moines and surrounding communities

Human Services
5
Big Brothers Big Sisters of Johnson County Inc

Serving johnson county (iowa) youth ages 6 to 18 by providing 1:1 professionally supported mentorship

Youth Development
6
Boone Beginnings Early Childhood and Family Development Center Inc

Provide childcare and high-quality programming for children in boone county.

Education
7
Des Moines Childrens Museum

To build the foundation of lifelong learning by promoting the power of play.

Arts & Culture
8
Boys & Girls Club of Jackson Co

Youth services

Youth Development
9
Boone County Historical Society Inc

Dedicated to acquiring, preserving,interpeting, and displaying the historical artifacts and records of Boone County.

—
10
Des Moines Co Historical Society

To maintain, improve and restore 3 historical properties

—
11
Conservation Foundation of Dickinson County

Awareness among visitors and residents while fostering appreciation, preservation and conservation of the iowa great lakes regions unique culture, history, glacial geological formations, native species and natural habitats through…

Environment
12
Wildwood Nature Preserve
Philanthropy
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Iowa Arboretum Inc; the most unlike its peers is Boone City Parks Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 40 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/9
Grantees still filing
7/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

ERICSON PUBLIC LIBRARY: $73,685 · OtherERICSON PUBLIC LIBRARYOGDEN COMMUNITY SCHOOLS: $29,749 · OtherOGDEN COMMUNITY SCHOOLSMADRID PUBLIC LIBRARY: $29,155 · OtherMADRID PUBLIC LIBRARYCITY OF PILOT MOUND: $23,975 · OtherCITY OF PILOT MOUNDOGDEN ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: $11,841 · OtherSACRED HEART SCHOOL: $11,558 · OtherFRANKLIN ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: $10,500 · OtherLEONARD A GOOD COMMUNITY LIBRARY: $10,373 · Other+25 more: $94,744 · Other+25 moreCHILD CARE JUNCTION INC: $25,453 · Human ServicesCHILD CARE JU…YOUTH AND SHELTER SERVICES INC: $18,000 · Human ServicesYOUTH AND SHE…IOWA ARBORETUM INC: $15,547 · EnvironmentDMACC FOUNDATION: $5,000 · EducationSTAN FRIESEN SENIOR TRIP INC: $1,500 · EducationBOONE CITY PARKS FOUNDATION: $5,000 · PhilanthropyMID-IOWA COUNCIL OF BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA INC: $2,000 · Youth Development
Other$295,580Human Services$43,453Environment$15,547Education$6,500Philanthropy$5,000Youth Development$2,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCHILD CARE JUNCTION INC: $25,453 over 9y, 0.7% of budgetYOUTH AND SHELTER SERVICES INC: $18,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetIOWA ARBORETUM INC: $15,547 over 6y, 0.6% of budgetTHE YOUNG MENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF GREATER DES MOINES: $7,750 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetDMACC FOUNDATION: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMID-IOWA COUNCIL OF BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSTAN FRIESEN SENIOR TRIP INC: $1,500 over 1y, 0.9% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds CHILD CARE JUNCTION INC ↗
  • Who funds YOUTH AND SHELTER SERVICES INC ↗
  • Who funds IOWA ARBORETUM INC ↗
  • Who funds THE YOUNG MENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF GREATER DES MOINES ↗
  • Who funds BOONE CITY PARKS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds DMACC FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds BOONE COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds MID-IOWA COUNCIL OF BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA INC ↗
  • Who funds STAN FRIESEN SENIOR TRIP INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Leonard a Good Testamentary TrustIA24.2× affinity9 shared granteesties to 8 of 8Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Leonard a Good Testamentary Trust · Community Fdn of Greater Des Moines F/K/A Greater Des Moines Community Fdn · Delta Dental of Iowa Foundation · Prairie Meadows Race Track and Casino Inc · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization George Paul and Grace E Lowrey Charitable Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from George Paul and Grace E Lowrey Charitable Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 40 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on George Paul and Grace E Lowrey’s filings →

    More from the funding graph