Skip to content
George Jr & Mary Alice Moss Foundation at a glance

· Private foundation

George Jr & Mary Alice Moss Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$20k
Granted FY2025still arriving
4
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
0195% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2025.

Education$110kHealth$28kEnvironment$19kFood & Nutrition$6kPublic Safety & Disaster$2kArts & Culture$2kHuman Services$500Housing & Shelter$200Other$0
02FY2025 · 4 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k3 grants · $10k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $10k
$5,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$571k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Christian Brothers Academy$10,000
Sarasota Memorial Healthcare Foundation$5,000
Clean Ocean Action$4,000
Baltimore Firefighters Burn Foundation$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–20, $3k) land where the poverty rate runs at 6%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%Foodbank of Monmouth and Ocean County(dba Fulfill): $3k → 6%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

86%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$148k · 10 repeat orgs$25k to everyone else

10 repeat relationships: 4 still active in FY2025, 6 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

10
8

Total granted

$148k
$25k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+17%
+30%

Still filing today

70%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthEnvironmentEducationFood & NutritionHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MU
    MONMOUTH UNIVERSITY INC
    5× · 2019–2023 · $45k · revenue +4%
  • SARASOTA MEMORIAL HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION INC
    2× · 2024–2025 · $10k · revenue +2%
  • MC
    MONMOUTH CONSERVATION FOUNDATION
    3× · 2021–2023 · $9k · revenue +17%

Funded once

  • MH
    Meridian Health Foundation
    one grant, 2021 · $10k
  • TT
    THE THANC FOUNDATION INC
    one grant, 2023 · $5k · revenue -17%
  • CO
    Clean Ocean Action - Network for Good
    one grant, 2020 · $4k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center

Leadership in the prevention, treatment, and cure of cancer through excellence, vision and cost effectiveness in patient care, outreach programs, research, and education.

Health
2
New Jersey Conservation Foundation

Recognizing that a healthy environment is critical to the well-being and survival of all living things, new jersey conservation foundation is devoted to preserving land and protecting natural resources throughout new jersey's (continued on…

Environment
3
Massachusetts Nurses Association

The mission of the mna, the association for registered nurses and health care professionals, is to preserve the identity, integrity, and continuity of professional nursing and health care in the commonwealth of massachusetts.

—
4
Conservation Law Foundation Inc

Conservation law foundation, inc. (clf) protects new england's environment for the benefit of all people and future generations. we use the law, science, and markets to create solutions that preserve and restore our natural resources,…

Environment
5
Montefiore New Rochelle Hospital

Mission: to heal, to teach, to discover and to advance the health of the communities we serve. values: humanity, innovation, teamwork, diversity and equity - our values define our philosophy of care. they shape our actions and motivate and…

Health
6
Earth & Space Research

Increase societal understanding of the earth system through scientific research and education.

Science & Tech
7
Ocean Conservancy

Ocean conservancy unites science, people, and policy to protect our ocean, today and for generations to come.

Environment
8
Sustainable Fisheries Partnership Foundation

To engage and catalyze global seafood supply chains in rebuilding depleted fish stocks and reducing the environmental impacts of fishing and fish farming.

Animals
9
Tidalhealth Nanticoke Inc

Improve the health of the communities we serve.

Health
10
Sanford Burnham Prebys Medical Discovery Institute

Sanford burnham prebys medical discovery institute's mission is to advance the biomedical sciences by cultivating the next generation of scientific leaders, providing meaningful opportunities for researchers of all backgrounds to learn,…

Health
11
The Quebec-Labrador Foundation Inc

The program mission of the quebec-labrador foundation u.s. is defined by a regional component (new england and eastern canada), and an international component, which ties our regional model to a global conservation network. qlf's program…

Philanthropy
12
Chambersburg Hospital

The chambersburg hospital is a regional non-profit health care organization committed to the improvement of the health and well-being of the people in southcentral pennsylvania.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Foodbank of Monmouth and Ocean Counties Inc D/B/a Fulfill; the most unlike its peers is Shrewsbury Historical Society. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 18 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/11
Grantees still filing
9/11
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Christian Brothers Academy: $65,000 · OtherChristian Brothers AcademyMeridian Health Foundation: $10,000 · OtherMeridian Health FoundationIndividual grant recipient: $5,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientClean Ocean Action - Network for Good: $3,500 · Other+4 more: $2,450 · OtherMONMOUTH UNIVERSITY INC: $45,000 · EducationMONMOUTH UNIVERSITY INCSARASOTA MEMORIAL HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 · HealthSARASOTA MEMO…THE THANC FOUNDATION INC: $5,000 · HealthTHE THANC FOU…AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $2,500 · HealthAMERICAN CANC…BALTIMORE FIREFIGHTERS BURN FOUNDATION: $2,000 · HealthBALTIMORE FIR…+1 more: $500 · HealthMONMOUTH CONSERVATION FOUNDATION: $8,500 · EnvironmentMONMOUTH C…CLEAN OCEAN ACTION INC: $7,000 · EnvironmentCLEAN OCEA…LUNCH BREAK INC: $3,500 · Food & NutritionTHE FOODBANK OF MONMOUTH AND OCEAN COUNTIES INC D/B/A FULFILL: $2,500 · Human Services
Other$85,950Education$45,000Health$20,000Environment$15,500Food & Nutrition$3,500Human Services$2,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetMONMOUTH UNIVERSITY INC: $45,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetSARASOTA MEMORIAL HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMONMOUTH CONSERVATION FOUNDATION: $8,500 over 3y, 0.6% of budgetCLEAN OCEAN ACTION INC: $7,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetTHE THANC FOUNDATION INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetLUNCH BREAK INC: $3,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE FOODBANK OF MONMOUTH AND OCEAN COUNTIES INC D/B/A FULFILL: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBALTIMORE FIREFIGHTERS BURN FOUNDATION: $2,000 over 2y, 1.4% of budgetShrewsbury Historical Society: $1,250 over 2y, 3.1% of budgetSHORE CLUBHOUSE INC: $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

National Philanthropi…Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
National Philanthropic TrustPA8.7× affinity4 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: National Philanthropic Trust · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization George Jr & Mary Alice Moss Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from George Jr & Mary Alice Moss Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 30%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →median 4%
  • Shore Clubhouse Inc: 7% of income from government
  • Lunch Break Inc: 4% of income from government
  • Monmouth University Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
3get no government money at all
3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 18 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on George Jr & Mary Alice Moss’ filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home