Skip to content

New Jersey · Private foundation

George Jr & Mary Alice Moss Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$20k
Granted FY2025(still arriving)
4
Grants FY2025
4
Organizations funded FY2024
50%
First-time grantees FY2024
Read the full brief
Median grant, FY2025
$5,000
Largest grant, FY2025
$10,000
Organizations funded a year
4 to 8
FY2019 to FY2024
States reached, FY2025
3
Total assets, FY2025
$571k
Applications
Takes unsolicited applications
Per its most recent filing; check its own site

How open it is to new grantees

In FY2024, 50% of the organizations George Jr & Mary Alice Moss Foundation funded were first-time grantees, receiving 51% of its grant dollars.

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 49% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $6k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24
HealthEnvironmentHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
The numbers by year
Fiscal yearOrganizations fundedTo those organizationsFirst-time grantees
FY2025still arriving4$20k0%
FY20244$12k50%
FY20236$31k50%
FY20224$22k25%
FY20216$35k67%
FY20208$31k38%
FY20195$23kn/a
95% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2025.

Education$110kHealth$28kEnvironment$19kFood & Nutrition$6kPublic Safety & Disaster$2kArts & Culture$2kHuman Services$500Housing & Shelter$200Other$0

Top grantees

Largest recipients by total granted, FY2019 to FY2025, and the share of each one’s budget the grants supplied at peak.

Show all 12 grantees
All grantees of George Jr & Mary Alice Moss Foundation by total granted
GranteeTotal grantedYearsShare of their budget
Monmouth University Inc$45,00050%
Sarasota Memorial Healthcare Foundation Inc$10,00020%
Monmouth Conservation Foundation$8,50031%
Clean Ocean Action Inc$7,00020%
The Thanc Foundation Inc$5,00010%
Lunch Break Inc$3,50020%
American Cancer Society Inc$2,50010%
The Foodbank of Monmouth and Ocean Counties Inc D/B/A Fulfill$2,50010%
Baltimore Firefighters Burn Foundation$2,00021%
Shrewsbury Historical Society$1,25023%
Shore Clubhouse Inc$50010%
Shrewsbury Historical Society$5001n/a

Plus 6 recipients with no EIN on record ($84k), not named here.

Where it is load-bearing

Each grantee by its size and the share of its budget George Jr & Mary Alice Moss Foundation supplied at peak.

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetMonmouth University Inc: $45,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetSarasota Memorial Healthcare Foundation Inc: $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMonmouth Conservation Foundation: $8,500 over 3y, 0.6% of budgetClean Ocean Action Inc: $7,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetThe Thanc Foundation Inc: $5,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetLunch Break Inc: $3,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetAmerican Cancer Society Inc: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetThe Foodbank of Monmouth and Ocean Counties Inc D/B/A Fulfill: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBaltimore Firefighters Burn Foundation: $2,000 over 2y, 1.4% of budgetShrewsbury Historical Society: $1,250 over 2y, 3.1% of budgetShore Clubhouse Inc: $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budget

Tap a dot to name the grantee.

How this is measured
Share of budget is the funder’s grant in a year over the grantee’s total revenue that year, at its highest across the years we hold; revenue is from all sources. Only grantees confirmed against their own filings, whose grants do not exceed their revenue, are plotted: the largest 11.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

National Philanthropic TrustPA8.7× affinity4 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: National Philanthropic Trust · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Compare George Jr & Mary Alice Moss Foundation with peer funders

About George Jr & Mary Alice Moss Foundation

How much does George Jr & Mary Alice Moss Foundation give?
George Jr & Mary Alice Moss Foundation reported 4 grants totaling $20,000 in its FY2025 IRS filing. It funded between 4 and 8 organizations a year over FY2019 to FY2024.
What does George Jr & Mary Alice Moss Foundation fund?
By grant dollars over FY2019 to FY2025, its largest causes are Education (64%), Health (16%), Environment (11%).
Who are George Jr & Mary Alice Moss Foundation's largest grantees?
By total granted over FY2019 to FY2025: Monmouth University Inc ($45k), Sarasota Memorial Healthcare Foundation Inc ($10k), Monmouth Conservation Foundation ($9k).
Does George Jr & Mary Alice Moss Foundation fund new organizations?
In FY2024, 50% of the organizations it funded were first-time grantees.
Does George Jr & Mary Alice Moss Foundation accept unsolicited applications?
Its most recent filing reports that it accepts unsolicited grant applications.
Which funders back the same organizations as George Jr & Mary Alice Moss Foundation?
Its strongest co-funders, measured against what their size predicts, include National Philanthropic Trust, Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund, Amazonsmile Foundation.
Where is George Jr & Mary Alice Moss Foundation based?
George Jr & Mary Alice Moss Foundation is based in NJ.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 18 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on George Jr & Mary Alice Moss’ filings →

More from the funding graph