Skip to content

Texas · Private foundation

George Gardner & Fanny Whiting

Its FY2026 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$28k
Granted FY2026(still arriving)
8
Grants FY2026
2
Organizations funded FY2025
0%
First-time grantees FY2025
Read the full brief
Median grant, FY2026
$3,000
Largest grant, FY2026
$7,000
Organizations funded a year
2 to 8
FY2019 to FY2025
States reached, FY2026
6
Total assets, FY2026
$587k
Applications
Takes unsolicited applications
Per its most recent filing; check its own site

How open it is to new grantees

In FY2025, 0% of the organizations George Gardner & Fanny Whiting funded were first-time grantees, receiving 0% of its grant dollars.

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
The numbers by year
Fiscal yearOrganizations fundedTo those organizationsFirst-time grantees
FY2026still arriving8$28k75%
FY20252$24k0%
FY20245$30k40%
FY20234$30k50%
FY20227$26k57%
FY20216$24k50%
FY20208$24k75%
FY20196$24k50%
100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2026.

Education$257kArts & Culture$1k

Where its grants go

Grant dollars by states, across the years we hold.

Which US states its grants reach

ME
VT
NH
MT
NY
MA
OH
PA
CT
VA
MD
NC
FL

Top grantees

Largest recipients by total granted, FY2017 to FY2026, and the share of each one’s budget the grants supplied at peak.

Show all 27 grantees

Plus 16 recipients with no EIN on record ($137k), not named here.

Where it is load-bearing

Each grantee by its size and the share of its budget George Gardner & Fanny Whiting supplied at peak.

25%50%75%100%$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetUniversity of New Haven: $22,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetRivier University: $17,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetWorcester Polytechnic Institute: $9,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBentley University: $7,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSyracuse University: $6,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFranklin Pierce University: $5,250 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetHigh Point University: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWentworth Institute of Technology Inc: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetEmerson College: $4,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCase Western Reserve University: $4,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetEndicott College: $3,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLees-McRae College Inc: $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetThe Trustees of Mount Holyoke College: $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUniversity of New England: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetChamplain College Incorporated: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetColby-Sawyer College: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLynn University Inc: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGordon College: $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDrexel University: $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGreen Mountain College: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetThe Trustees of the Smith College: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetThe University of Tampa Incorporated: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSt Joseph's University New York: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget

Tap a dot to name the grantee.

How this is measured
Share of budget is the funder’s grant in a year over the grantee’s total revenue that year, at its highest across the years we hold; revenue is from all sources. Only grantees confirmed against their own filings, whose grants do not exceed their revenue, are plotted: the largest 23.

Nonprofits that may fit its grantmaking

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Donor Advised Charitable Giving IncCO5.4× affinity4 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Compare George Gardner & Fanny Whiting with peer funders

About George Gardner & Fanny Whiting

How much does George Gardner & Fanny Whiting give?
George Gardner & Fanny Whiting reported 8 grants totaling $28,000 in its FY2026 IRS filing. It funded between 2 and 8 organizations a year over FY2019 to FY2025.
What does George Gardner & Fanny Whiting fund?
By grant dollars over FY2017 to FY2026, its largest causes are Education (100%), Arts & Culture (0%).
Who are George Gardner & Fanny Whiting's largest grantees?
By total granted over FY2017 to FY2026: University of New Haven ($22k), Rivier University ($17k), Worcester Polytechnic Institute ($10k).
Does George Gardner & Fanny Whiting fund new organizations?
In FY2025, 0% of the organizations it funded were first-time grantees.
Does George Gardner & Fanny Whiting accept unsolicited applications?
Its most recent filing reports that it accepts unsolicited grant applications.
Which funders back the same organizations as George Gardner & Fanny Whiting?
Its strongest co-funders, measured against what their size predicts, include Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc, Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund, Amazonsmile Foundation.
Where is George Gardner & Fanny Whiting based?
George Gardner & Fanny Whiting is based in TX.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 43 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2026, released 2026. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on George Gardner & Fanny Whiting’s filings →

More from the funding graph