Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

George F and Helen M Hirschmann Charitable Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$3k
Granted FY2024still arriving
1
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$3k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20202024.

Animals$754kHousing & Shelter$28kHealth$15kPhilanthropy$10k
02FY2024 · 1 grant

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$3,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$3.5M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Individual grant recipient$3,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY20–23) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 52% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.

area typical 9%Yorkie Luv Rescue Inc: $5k → 11%Husky Halfway House Foundation: $5k → 21%Animal Welfare League of Benzie County Inc: $12k → 7%Animal Welfare League of Benzie County Inc: $10k → 10%Homeward Bound Animal Shelter: $5k → 13%New Beginnings: $5k → 5%Lakeshore Pembroke Welsh Corgi Rescue: $7k → 5%THIENSVILLE-MEQUON SMALL ANIMAL CLI: $30k → 6%Best Friends Animal Society: $5k → 9%Lucky Day Animal Rescue of Colorado: $5k → 6%My Second Home Rescue: $7k → 9%ADOPT: $8k → 7%PAWS Chicago: $15k → 14%Pets In Need Society: $10k → 12%Animal Welfare League of Benzie County: $12k → 7%LAKESHORE PEMBROKE WELSH CORGI RESC: $7k → 5%Society of St Francis: $25k → 6%My Second Home Rescue: $7k → 9%ADOPT: $8k → 7%PAWS Chicago: $15k → 14%Pets In Need Society: $10k → 12%ANIMAL WELFARE LEAGUE OF BENZIE COU: $12k → 7%Society of St Francis: $20k → 6%MY SECOND HOME RESCUE: $7k → 9%Naperville Area Humane Society: $8k → 7%PAWS CHICAGO DEVELOPMENT OFFICE: $15k → 14%PETS IN NEED SOCIETY: $10k → 12%Society of St Francis: $10k → 6%My Second Home Rescue: $7k → 9%ADOPT Pet Shelter: $7k → 7%PAWS Chicago: $15k → 14%Pets in Need Society: $10k → 12%A Heart for Animals: $7k → 6%Naperville Area Humane Society: $7k → 7%Save-A-Pet: $10k → 8%Buddy Foundation: $15k → 14%A Heart for Animals: $7k → 6%Sav-A-Pet: $10k → 8%Buddy Foundation: $10k → 14%A Heart for Animals: $7k → 6%Save-A-Pet: $10k → 8%Buddy Foundation: $10k → 14%A Heart For Animals: $7k → 6%SAV-A-PET: $10k → 8%KAY'S ANIMAL SHELTER INC: $12k → 14%Kays Animal Shelter: $12k → 14%Kay's Animal Shelter: $12k → 14%Kay's Animal Shelter Inc: $10k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

WA
IL
WI
MI
UT
CO
MO
KY
AZ
KS
NC
OK

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

88%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$702k · 32 repeat orgs$95k to everyone else

32 repeat relationships — 0 still active in FY2024, 32 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

32
9

Total granted

$702k
$92k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+19%
+20%

Still filing today

75%
22%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 0% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $3k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TB
    THE BUDDY FOUNDATION
    4× · 2020–2023 · $50k · revenue +138%
  • PC
    PAWS CHICAGO
    3× · 2021–2023 · $45k · revenue +84%
  • SI
    SAVE-A-PET INC
    4× · 2020–2023 · $40k · revenue +82%

Funded once

  • TS
    THIENSVILLE-MEQUON SMALL ANIMAL CLI
    one grant, 2020 · $30k
  • PC
    PAWS CHICAGO DEVELOPMENT OFFICE
    one grant, 2020 · $15k
  • AW
    ANIMAL WELFARE LEAGUE OF BENZIE COU
    one grant, 2020 · $12k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Hope Fur Paws Rescue

To help injured, abandoned and unwanted animals. We provide food, vet care that includes heartworm prevention and spay or neuter services, shelter and anything else needed.

Animals
2
Safe Haven Inc
Animals
3
Pets Without Partners

Find homes for homeless/abandoned dogs. Provide full vet car and housing while awaiting adoption,

Animals
4
Raskels Rescue
Animals
5
Paws and Claws Animal Shelter
Animals
6
Shelters and Shelves Rescue Inc

foster based dog rescue working with shelters to save dogs

Animals
7
Donna's Love Pet Rescue
Animals
8
Angies Dog House

We are dedicated to rescuig animals left homeless for whatever reason, animals in public shelters where they are at high risk of euthanasia, animals given up by their owners because of difficult circumstances, and those in danger of abuse…

Animals
9
Animal Rescue and Adoption Agency Inc

An animal rescue/adoption Agency. Rescued animals are from kill shelters or owner surrenders facing hardship then rehabbed/medical completed while in foster care then adopted into loving homes.

Animals
10
Pound Pets Inc

Animal Rescue - finding homes for abandoned animals in Granite City, spaying and neutering stray animals and feral cats

Animals
11
Fur Animal Rescue

Animal rescue organization dedicated to finding homes for animals at the animal shelter. we also provde vet care foster homes, and assistance with homing for special needs animals.

Animals
12
Happy Acres Pet Rescue
Animals

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Save-a-Pet Inc and the most unlike its peers is Community Foundation of Central Mo. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

Your grantees are a median of 26 years old; the field is 20. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number18%0%<5yr13%7%5–10yr18%39%10–20yr15%21%20–35yr14%18%35–55yr22%14%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value18%0%<5yr13%2%5–10yr18%24%10–20yr15%33%20–35yr14%26%35–55yr22%16%55yr+

The field is 18% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 12% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/31
the rest of the field
12%
8,891/72,328

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

27 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 27 of the 43 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
27/27
Grantees still filing
17/27
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

SOCIETY OF ST FRANCIS — $55,000 · AnimalsSOCIETY OF ST FRANCISTHE BUDDY FOUNDATION — $50,000 · AnimalsTHE BUDDY FOUNDATIONKAY'S ANIMAL SHELTER — $46,000 · AnimalsKAY'S ANIMAL SHELTERPAWS CHICAGO — $45,000 · AnimalsPAWS CHICAGOPETS IN NEED SOCIETY — $40,000 · AnimalsPETS IN NEED SOCIETYSAVE-A-PET INC — $40,000 · AnimalsSAVE-A-PET INCAnimal Welfare League of Benzie County — $34,000 · AnimalsAnimal Welfare League of Benzie CountyNo Kill Columbia Inc — $30,000 · AnimalsA HEART FOR ANIMALS INC — $28,000 · AnimalsNAPERVILLE AREA HUMANE SOCIETY — $24,000 · Animals+16 more — $209,500 · Animals+16 moreTHIENSVILLE-MEQUON SMALL ANIMAL CLI — $30,000 · OtherTHIENSVILLE-MEQUON SMALL AN…MY SECOND HOME RESCUE INC — $28,000 · OtherMY SECOND HOME RESCUE INCADOPT — $21,000 · OtherADOPTHOMEWARD BOUND ANIMAL SHELTER — $20,000 · OtherHOMEWARD BOUND ANIMAL SHELT…PAWS CHICAGO DEVELOPMENT OFFICE — $15,000 · OtherPAWS CHICAGO DEVELOPMENT OF…ANIMAL WELFARE LEAGUE OF BENZIE COU — $12,000 · OtherANIMAL WELFARE LEAGUE OF BE…CORGI CONNECTION OF KANSAS — $10,000 · OtherHOPE PET RESCUE INC — $10,000 · OtherUnchained Melodies Dog Rescue — $10,000 · OtherADOPT Pet Shelter — $7,000 · OtherLakeshore Pembroke Welsh Corgi Rescue — $6,500 · OtherLAKESHORE PEMBROKE WELSH CORGI RESC — $6,500 · Other+4 more — $19,000 · Other+4 moreCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF CENTRAL MO — $10,000 · Philanthropy
Animals$601,500Other$195,000Philanthropy$10,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetSOCIETY OF ST FRANCIS — $55,000 over 3y, 5.1% of budgetTHE BUDDY FOUNDATION — $50,000 over 4y, 3.6% of budgetKAY'S ANIMAL SHELTER — $46,000 over 4y, 3.5% of budgetPAWS CHICAGO — $45,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetSAVE-A-PET INC — $40,000 over 4y, 0.6% of budgetAnimal Welfare League of Benzie County — $34,000 over 3y, 27% of budgetNo Kill Columbia Inc — $30,000 over 3y, 2.7% of budgetA HEART FOR ANIMALS INC — $28,000 over 4y, 7.0% of budgetNAPERVILLE AREA HUMANE SOCIETY — $24,000 over 4y, 0.9% of budgetANIMAL HOUSE SHELTER INC — $20,000 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetSOUTH SUBURBAN HUMANE SOCIETY — $20,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetTHE MAXFUND INC — $20,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetORPHANS OF THE STORM — $20,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetTRIO ANIMAL FOUNDATION — $20,000 over 4y, 0.9% of budgetBEST FRIENDS ANIMAL SOCIETY — $17,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetANDERSON ANIMAL SHELTER — $14,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetCORGIAID INC — $12,500 over 4y, 4.3% of budgetHOOVED ANIMAL RESCUE & PROTECTION SOCIETY — $12,000 over 4y, 0.9% of budgetYORKIE LUV RESCUE INC — $10,000 over 2y, 8.6% of budgetCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF CENTRAL MO — $10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetHOPE ANIMAL RESCUE — $10,000 over 4y, 1.3% of budgetHOPE ANIMAL RESCUES — $10,000 over 4y, 1.2% of budgetLucky Day Animal Rescue of Colorado — $8,500 over 2y, 2.3% of budgetHUSKY HALFWAY HOUSE FOUNDATION — $5,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetON ANGELS WINGS INC — $5,000 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetStarfish Animal Rescue — $5,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds SOCIETY OF ST FRANCIS
  • Who funds THE BUDDY FOUNDATION
  • Who funds KAY'S ANIMAL SHELTER
  • Who funds PAWS CHICAGO
  • Who funds PETS IN NEED SOCIETY
  • Who funds SAVE-A-PET INC
  • Who funds Animal Welfare League of Benzie County
  • Who funds No Kill Columbia Inc
  • Who funds A HEART FOR ANIMALS INC
  • Who funds NAPERVILLE AREA HUMANE SOCIETY
  • Who funds ANIMAL HOUSE SHELTER INC
  • Who funds SOUTH SUBURBAN HUMANE SOCIETY
  • Who funds THE MAXFUND INC
  • Who funds ORPHANS OF THE STORM
  • Who funds TRIO ANIMAL FOUNDATION
  • Who funds BEST FRIENDS ANIMAL SOCIETY
  • Who funds ANDERSON ANIMAL SHELTER
  • Who funds CORGIAID INC
  • Who funds HOOVED ANIMAL RESCUE & PROTECTION SOCIETY
  • Who funds YORKIE LUV RESCUE INC
  • Who funds COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF CENTRAL MO
  • Who funds HOPE ANIMAL RESCUE
  • Who funds HOPE ANIMAL RESCUES
  • Who funds Lucky Day Animal Rescue of Colorado
  • Who funds HUSKY HALFWAY HOUSE FOUNDATION
  • Who funds ON ANGELS WINGS INC

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

AbbVie FoundationIL22.2× affinity12 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: AbbVie Foundation · Arthur J Gallagher Foundation · Motorola Solutions Foundation · Chubb Charitable Foundation · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · Alliant Credit Union Foundation · Petco Love · Greater Good Charities · Petsmart Charities Inc · Paypal Charitable Giving Fund · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · The Pfizer Foundation Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization George F and Helen M Hirschmann Charitable Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 10%2%8%17%30%your share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to George F and Helen M Hirschmann Charitable Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to George F and Helen M Hirschmann Charitable Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 43 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph