Skip to content

· Private foundation

George F & Ann Harris Bellows Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$775k
Granted FY2024still arriving
10
Grants FY2024still arriving
3
States reached
$300k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Health$1.7MEducation$905kAnimals$250kHuman Services$135kHousing & Shelter$135kCommunity Improvement$60kFood & Nutrition$20k
02FY2024 · 10 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k1 grant · $5k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $110k
  • $50k–250k4 grants · $360k
  • $250k+1 grant · $300k
$60,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$1.3M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
BAYLOR COLLEGE OF MEDICINE$300,000
DOGS FOR OUR BRAVE$100,000
TEXAS CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL$100,000
MOUNT SINAI CARDIOVASCULAR RESEARCH INSTITUTE$100,000
HOUSING OPPORTUNITIES FOR MUSICIANS AND ENTERTAINERS (HOME)$60,000
THE RISE SCHOOL OF HOUSTON$35,000
THE NOBELITY PROJECT$25,000
KIPP TEXAS PUBLIC SCHOOLS - HOUSTON$25,000
NEUHAUS EDUCATION CENTER$25,000
CENTRAL TEXAS FOOD BANK$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–22, $135k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%CITY OF PROMISE: $50k → 8%CITY OF PROMISE: $30k → 8%CITY OF PROMISE: $25k → 8%CITY OF PROMISE: $25k → 8%CITY OF PROMISE: $5k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

91%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$2.9M · 15 repeat orgs$270k to everyone else

15 repeat relationships: 8 still active in FY2024, 7 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

15
3

Total granted

$2.9M
$145k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+42%
+53%

Still filing today

47%
67%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 84% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $125k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
EducationHuman ServicesHealthPublic BenefitMembership BenefitFood & NutritionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • BC
    Baylor College of Medicine
    8× · 2017–2024 · $850k · revenue +67%
  • DF
    Dogs For Our Brave Inc
    3× · 2022–2024 · $250k · revenue +59%
  • CO
    CITY OF PROMISE INC
    5× · 2017–2022 · $135k · revenue +42%

Funded once

  • CP
    CALIFORNIA PACIFIC MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $75k · revenue +32%
  • PE
    PRISON ENTREPRENEURSHIP PROGRAM INCgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $60k · revenue +53%
  • TM
    THE MONARCH SCHOOL AND INSTITUTE
    one grant, 2023 · $10k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Royal School System

The mission of Royal Public Schools is to spark students' natural curiosity and love of learning while providing the knowledge and skills they need to lead successful and fulfilling lives.

Education
2
The University of TexasTexas a&M Investment Management Company

To generate superior long-term investment returns to support The University of Texas and Texas A&M University systems as they provide world-class teaching, push the boundaries of discovery, and achieve excellence in patient healthcare for…

Education
3
Children's Hospital Ophthalmology Foundation Inc

The Foundation's mission is to provide ophthalmology services primarily to patients at Boston Children's Hospital and at satellite locations. The Foundation carries on and promotes basic and applied medical research and education in the…

Health
4
Children's Hospital Pathology Foundation Inc

The Foundation's mission is to provide pathology services primarily to patients at Boston Children's Hospital and at satellite locations. The Foundation carries on and promotes basic and applied medical research and education in the field…

Health
5
Texas Heart Medical Group

To provide cutting-edge cardiac care to diagnose, treat, and prevent cardiovascular diseases.

Health
6
Trinity University

Trinity university is an independent co-educational university whose mission is excellence in the interrelated areas of teaching, research and services.

Education
7
Children's Population Health

Children's population health strives to improve the health of children across the continuum of care.

—
8
Children's Hospital Corporation

Provider of pediatric healthcare, education, research & community service

Health
9
Scott & White Healthcare Foundation

To foster and support the activities and purposes of Baylor Scott & White Health (BSWH), to encourage broad-based public support of the healthcare system and its affiliated institutions, and to advance the medical objectives, including…

Health
10
Children's Health System of Texas

With more than 1 million patient visits each year, Children's Health is North Texas' leading pediatric health system and among the largest in the nation. For more than a century, our mission has been clear: make life better for children.…

Health
11
Tcs Education - Texas Inc

The Chicago School educates the next generation of change-makers in innovative theory and culturally competent practice to strengthen the integrated health of individuals, organizations, and communities.

—
12
The Chicago School of Professional Psychology

The Chicago School educates the next generation of change-makers in innovative theory and culturally competent practice to strengthen the integrated health of individuals, organizations, and communities.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Texas Children's Hospital; the most unlike its peers is The Nobelity Project. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 20 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/11
Grantees still filing
8/11
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA: $450,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF ARIZONAAMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGISTS: $280,000 · OtherAMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGISTSMOUNT SINAI CARDIOVASCULAR RESEARCH INSTITUTE: $200,000 · OtherMOUNT SINAI CARDIOVASCULAR RESEARCH INSTITUTEHOUSING OPPORTUNITIES FOR MUSICIANS AND ENTERTAINERS (HOME): $135,000 · OtherHOUSING OPPORTUNITIES FOR MUSICIANS AND ENTERTAINERS …THE RISE SCHOOL: $125,000 · OtherTHE RISE SCHOOLTHE RISE SCHOOL OF HOUSTON: $100,000 · OtherTHE RISE SCHOOL OF HOUSTONKIPP TEXAS PUBLIC SCHOOLS - HOUSTON: $100,000 · OtherKIPP TEXAS PUBLIC SCHOOLS - HOUSTONKIPP ACADEMY: $60,000 · Other+2 more: $35,000 · OtherBaylor College of Medicine: $850,000 · EducationBaylor College of MedicineThe Monarch School Monarch Institute for Neurological Diff: $50,000 · EducationThe Monarch School Monarch Instit…The Nobelity Project: $35,000 · EducationDogs For Our Brave Inc: $250,000 · Public BenefitCITY OF PROMISE INC: $135,000 · Human ServicesPRISON ENTREPRENEURSHIP PROGRAM INC: $60,000 · Human ServicesTexas Children's Hospital: $100,000 · HealthCALIFORNIA PACIFIC MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION: $75,000 · HealthHealth Alliance for Austin Musicians: $100,000 · Membership BenefitCentral Texas Food Bank Inc: $20,000 · Food & Nutrition
Other$1,485,000Education$935,000Public Benefit$250,000Human Services$195,000Health$175,000Membership Benefit$100,000Food & Nutrition$20,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetBaylor College of Medicine: $850,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetDogs For Our Brave Inc: $250,000 over 3y, 7.5% of budgetCITY OF PROMISE INC: $135,000 over 5y, 4.2% of budgetTexas Children's Hospital: $100,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHealth Alliance for Austin Musicians: $100,000 over 3y, 0.7% of budgetCALIFORNIA PACIFIC MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION: $75,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetPRISON ENTREPRENEURSHIP PROGRAM INC: $60,000 over 1y, 2.4% of budgetThe Monarch School Monarch Institute for Neurological Diff: $50,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetThe Nobelity Project: $35,000 over 2y, 6.0% of budgetThe W Oscar Neuhaus Memorial Foundation: $25,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetCentral Texas Food Bank Inc: $20,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Baylor College of Medicine ↗
  • Who funds Dogs For Our Brave Inc ↗
  • Who funds CITY OF PROMISE INC ↗
  • Who funds Texas Children's Hospital ↗
  • Who funds Health Alliance for Austin Musicians ↗
  • Who funds CALIFORNIA PACIFIC MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds PRISON ENTREPRENEURSHIP PROGRAM INC ↗
  • Who funds The Monarch School Monarch Institute for Neurological Diff ↗
  • Who funds The Nobelity Project ↗
  • Who funds The W Oscar Neuhaus Memorial Foundation ↗
  • Who funds Central Texas Food Bank Inc ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Blackbaud Giving FundSC10.8× affinity4 shared granteesties to 6 of 6Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization George F & Ann Harris Bellows Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from George F & Ann Harris Bellows Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to George F & Ann Harris Bellows Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to George F & Ann Harris Bellows Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 20 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on George F & Ann Harris Bellows’ filings →

    More from the funding graph