· Private foundation
George B Quatman Foundation
Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2019–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k6 grants · $25k
- $10k–50k15 grants · $305k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| FOUNDATION FOR COMMUNITY DEVT INC | $40,000 |
| NUBABILITY ATHLETICS FOUNDATION | $35,000 |
| COMMUNITY PARTNERS FOR KNOW THE GLOW | $32,667 |
| FLORIDA MARCHING BAND TOURNAMENT INC | $30,000 |
| SAINT JOSEPH PRIMARY CARE | $25,000 |
| EQUESTRIAN THERAPY PROGRAM | $24,666 |
| CHARITABLE FRATERNAL ORDER OF POLICE | $20,000 |
| PURRIFIC RESCUE | $20,000 |
| THERAPEUTIC RIDING CENTER OF HUNTINGTON | $17,667 |
| OXFORD HOUSE INC | $10,000 |
| MARIMOR LEGACY FOUNDATION | $10,000 |
| HAPPY TAILS PUP PARTNERS | $10,000 |
| THE OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION | $10,000 |
| BUCKNER INTERNATIONAL | $10,000 |
| ADOPTION NETWORK OF CLEVELAND | $10,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY20–25, $126k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
19 repeat relationships — 15 still active in FY2025, 4 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 78% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $74k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- FMFLORIDA MARCHING BAND TOURNAMENTINC4× · 2022–2025 · $125k · revenue +204% · 42% of their budget
- TRTHERAPEUTIC RIDING CENTER OF HUNTINGTON BEACH INC5× · 2021–2025 · $117k · revenue +114%
- CPCOMMUNITY PARTNERS2× · 2021–2022 · $77k · revenue +73%
Funded once
- GEGOODWILL EASTER SEALS MIAMI VALLEYgraduatedone grant, 2020 · $150k · revenue +82%
- BABUILDING AFRICAN AMERICAN MINDS INCgraduatedone grant, 2022 · $64k · revenue +124%
- CSCENTRAL STATE UNIVERSITYone grant, 2020 · $33k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To strengthen the capacity of United Ways across Ohio and to advance the common good for Ohioans.
Align the life sciences ecosystem in the state of ohio, building collaborative partnerships, and advocating for policies and funding that will help to accelerate life science priorities and drive sustainable economic growth.
To lead and equip ohio philanthropy to be effective partners for change in our communities.
The organization's mission is to promote interest in science. this is done through encouraging and assuring the discovery, understanding, dissemination and practice of education, science, mathematics, engineering, technology, or their…
To cultivate performance excellence and continuous improvement among business, education, government, healthcare, and non-profit organizations based in ohio, indiana, illinois and west virginia.
The ohio coalition for the education of children with disabilities is a collaboration of parents, professionals, and partners advocating for children with disabilities to receive the educational services, experiences, and supports they…
The mission of ohio life sciences foundation is to accelerate bioscience discovery, innovation and commercialization of global value, driving economic growth, company attraction, improving workforce training and improved quality of life in…
Abilities First is committed to providing comprehensive services and quality care to each child and adult with special needs to put their abilities first.
The Foundation was created in December 1993 as a nonprofit 501(c)(3) and re-established in August 2017, to operate exclusively for charitable, scientific and educational purposes. The Foundation is a supporting organization to Donor…
Empowering and strengthening ohio's people (esop) helps adults in all stages of life achieve and maintain financial wellness and housing stability.
See Schedule ODeans for Impact supports educator-preparation programs to bring the science of learning into teaching practice; partners with policymakers to ensure pathways into teaching are accessible, practice-based, and…
United Way improves lives by uniting the caring power of our community.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Goodwill Easter Seals Miami Valley and the most unlike its peers is With Gods Grace. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 21 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 5% of your grantees by number, and just 11% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
52 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 52 of the 69 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds GOODWILL EASTER SEALS MIAMI VALLEY ↗
- Who funds FLORIDA MARCHING BAND TOURNAMENTINC ↗
- Who funds THERAPEUTIC RIDING CENTER OF HUNTINGTON BEACH INC ↗
- Who funds JUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT OF THE EASTERN SHORE INC ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY PARTNERS ↗
- Who funds MARIMOR LEGACY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds THE FOUNDATION FOR COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ↗
- Who funds Equestrian Therapy Program ↗
- Who funds BUILDING AFRICAN AMERICAN MINDS INC ↗
- Who funds ELEVATE METRO KC ↗
- Who funds OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Nubability Athletics Foundation ↗
- Who funds Saint Joseph Primary Care ↗
- Who funds CENTRAL STATE UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds James A Rhodes State College Foundation ↗
- Who funds The Lima Community Foundation ↗
- Who funds Greater Dayton Public Television dba Think TV ↗
- Who funds LEARN TO EARN DAYTON ↗
- Who funds ADOPTION NETWORK CLEVELAND ↗
- Who funds MILITARY AVIATION PRESERVATION SOCIETY ↗
- Who funds SPIRIT OF THE GULF SWEET ADELINES INTERNATIONAL ↗
- Who funds ADVOCATES FOR BASIC LEGAL EQUALITY INC ↗
- Who funds THE HILLSIDE TRUST ↗
- Who funds MILFORD SCHOOLS FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds LOGAN ELM EDUCATION FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds THOMAS JEFFERSON FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds WITH GODS GRACE ↗
- Who funds International Rescue Committee INC ↗
- Who funds WHIS-PURR RESCUE ↗
- Who funds Soaring as Eagles Outreach Ministry ↗
- Who funds CARPENTER'S SHELTER INC ↗
- Who funds BUCKNER INTERNATIONAL ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Dayton Foundation Plus Inc · Dayton Foundation Depository · The Dayton Foundation · Frank M Tait Foundation · Mathile Family Foundation · United Way of the Cape Fear Area Inc · New Hanover Community Endowment Inc · Centerpoint Energy Foundation Inc · The Cleveland Foundation · The Greater Cincinnati Foundation · Columbus Foundation · Thrivent Charitable Impact & Investing
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization George B Quatman Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Building African American Minds Inc — 12% of income from government
- Oxford House Inc — 8% of income from government
- Junior Achievement of the Eastern Shore Inc — 1% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.