Skip to content

· Private foundation

George Andreve Foundation Inc

$46k
Granted FY2025still arriving
30
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$7k
Largest
01What it funds
0199% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$185kReligion$30kArts & Culture$23kFood & Nutrition$22kAnimals$14kHealth$12kScience & Tech$10kEnvironment$10kOther$0
02FY2025 · 30 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$600
Median grant
2
States reached
$688k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
PIEDMONT SCHOOL$6,812
GREENSBORO DAY SCHOOL$5,505
GREENSBORO DAY SCHOOL$5,500
NATIONAL PARKS CONSERVATION ASSOCIO$4,400
THE TANGER CENTER$4,382
COLLEGE PARK CHURCH$3,000
FERAL CAT OF GUILFORD$2,605
FAMILY ROOM$2,314
UNC-G$1,445
GREENSBORO DAY SCHOOL$1,376
GREENSBORO DAY SCHOOL$1,185
GREENSBORO DAY SCHOOL$1,000
NATIONAL STEM SOCIETY$943
AMERICA HEART ASSOC$620
NOBLES$600
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–25, $6k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 67% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%BAPS CHARITIES INC: $1k → 8%BAPS CHARITIES INC: $1k → 8%SANCTUARY HOUSE: $365 → 16%FAMILY ROOM: $2k → 16%FAMILY ROOM: $500 → 16%FAMILY ROOM: $300 → 16%FAMILY ROOM: $259 → 16%THE BARNABUS NETWORK: $382 → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MN
NY
PA
NJ
MO
AZ
NC
SC
DC
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 6% of George Andreve Foundation Inc’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address. By recipient address, 94% of the giving stays in NC; by stated purpose, 85%.

George Andreve Foundation Inclessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 3.8% directed abroad (not shown)
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

88%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$297k · 34 repeat orgs$39k to everyone else

34 repeat relationships: 13 still active in FY2025, 21 since wound down; 12 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

34
32

Total granted

$297k
$28k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+15%
+18%

Still filing today

38%
28%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 75% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $11k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationHuman ServicesArts & CultureEnvironmentHealthYouth DevelopmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • GI
    Greensboro Independent School Corp
    9× · 2017–2025 · $127k · revenue +71%
  • TN
    THE NATURAL SCIENCE CENTER OF GREENSBORO INC DBA GREENSBORO SCIENCE CENTER
    9× · 2017–2025 · $9k · revenue +245%
  • FR
    FAMILY ROOM FOSTER CARE RESOURCE CENTER
    4× · 2022–2025 · $3k · revenue +159%

Funded once

  • US
    UNCG SCHOOL OF EDUCATION
    one grant, 2017 · $7k
  • HA
    HOPE ACADEMY
    one grant, 2019 · $5k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2023 · $4k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Greensboro College

Greensboro College provides a liberal arts education grounded in the traditions of the United Methodist Church and fosters the intellectual, social, and spiritual development of all students while supporting their individual needs.

Education
2
Boston Architectural College

The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.

—
3
Greenville College

Greenville college d/b/a greenville university empowers students for lives of character and service through a transforming christ-centered education in the liberal arts, sciences, and professional studies.

Education
4
Wilson College

Wilson college empowers students to be confident and critical thinkers, creative visionaries, effective communicators, honorable leaders, and agents of justice.

Education
5
Saint Anselm College

Saint anselm is a catholic, benedictine college providing all of its students a distinctive liberal arts education that incorporates opportunities for professional and career preparation. it does so in a learning community that encourages…

Education
6
Northeast College of Health Sciences

Northeast college of health sciences (the college) is committed to academic excellence, leadership, and professional best practices in the health sciences.

Education
7
Brevard College Corporation

Brevard college is committed to an experiential liberal arts education that encourages personal growth and inspires artistic, intellectual, and social action.

Education
8
Arbor Research Collaborative for Health

Arbor research collaborative for health is committed to improving patient care through research that shapes medical policies and practice. in particular, arbor research conducts health outcomes research on chronic disease and end-stage…

Health
9
Gettysburg College

Gettysburg college is a residential, undergraduate college of the liberal arts and sciences.

Education
10
President and Trustees of Bates College

Bates is a college of the liberal arts and sciences, and is a coeducational, nonsectarian, residential college with special commitments to academic rigor, and to assuring in all of its efforts the dignity of each individual, and access to…

Education
11
Williams College

Williams College strives to achieve educational excellence by fostering a community of learning in collaboration with students, faculty, staff, devoted alumni and parents.

Education
12
American Association for the Advancement of Science

Advance science, engineering, and innovation throughout the world for the benefit of all. the world's largest multidisciplinary scientific society and a leading publisher of cutting-edge research through its science family of journals,…

Science & Tech
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Elon University; the most unlike its peers is Wake Forest University. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

24 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 24 of the 78 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
24/24
Grantees still filing
15/24
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

THE UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA AT GREENSBORO: $25,400 · OtherTHE UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA AT GREENSBOROCOLLEGE PARK BAPTIST CHURCH: $23,718 · OtherCOLLEGE PARK BAPTIST CHURCHTHE PIEDMONT SCHOOL INC: $11,865 · OtherTHE PIEDMONT SCHOOL INCIndividual grant recipient: $9,787 · OtherIndividual grant recipientTHE TANGER CENTER: $8,271 · OtherGUILFORD PARK PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH: $7,962 · OtherSTEVEN TANGER CENTER PERFORMING ART: $7,513 · OtherUNCG SCHOOL OF EDUCATION: $7,000 · OtherUNCG: $6,695 · Other+49 more: $68,651 · Other+49 moreGreensboro Independent School Corp: $126,868 · EducationGreensboro Independent School Corp+4 more: $2,772 · EducationTHE NATURAL SCIENCE CENTER OF GREENSBORO INC DBA GREENSBORO SCIENCE CENTER: $9,327 · Arts & CultureArts For Life: $3,000 · Arts & Culture+1 more: $372 · Arts & CultureFAMILY ROOM FOSTER CARE RESOURCE CENTER: $3,373 · Human ServicesBAPS CHARITIES INC: $2,000 · Human ServicesTHE BARNABAS NETWORK: $1,748 · Human ServicesSanctuary House Inc: $365 · Human ServicesPIEDMONT LAND CONSERVANCY: $2,500 · EnvironmentNATIONAL PARKS CONSERVATION ASSOCIATION: $2,500 · EnvironmentNORTH CAROLINA CONSERVATION NETWORK: $410 · EnvironmentFELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN ATHLETES: $2,762 · Youth DevelopmentEB RESEARCH PARTNERSHIP INC: $950 · HealthBREAKTHROUGH T1D: $50 · HealthAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $50 · HealthTRIAD YOUTH ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION: $252 · Recreation & Sports
Other$176,862Education$129,640Arts & Culture$12,699Human Services$7,486Environment$5,410Youth Development$2,762Health$1,050Recreation & Sports$252

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetGreensboro Independent School Corp: $126,868 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetTHE PIEDMONT SCHOOL INC: $11,865 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetTHE NATURAL SCIENCE CENTER OF GREENSBORO INC DBA GREENSBORO SCIENCE CENTER: $9,327 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetGREENSBORO CHILDREN'S MUSEUM INC: $4,658 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetFAMILY ROOM FOSTER CARE RESOURCE CENTER: $3,373 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetArts For Life: $3,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetFELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN ATHLETES: $2,762 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetPIEDMONT LAND CONSERVANCY: $2,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetNATIONAL PARKS CONSERVATION ASSOCIATION: $2,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetGUILFORD COLLEGE: $2,367 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHE BARNABAS NETWORK: $1,748 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetEB RESEARCH PARTNERSHIP INC: $950 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNORTH CAROLINA CONSERVATION NETWORK: $410 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetOLD SALEM INC: $372 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetWAKE FOREST UNIVERSITY: $305 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetALEXS LEMONADE STAND FOUNDATION: $300 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTRIAD YOUTH ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION: $252 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetFreedom Farm Ministries: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBREAKTHROUGH T1D: $50 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetElon University: $50 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBARTON COLLEGE: $50 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $50 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Greensboro Independent School Corp ↗
  • Who funds THE PIEDMONT SCHOOL INC ↗
  • Who funds THE NATURAL SCIENCE CENTER OF GREENSBORO INC DBA GREENSBORO SCIENCE CENTER ↗
  • Who funds GREENSBORO CHILDREN'S MUSEUM INC ↗
  • Who funds FAMILY ROOM FOSTER CARE RESOURCE CENTER ↗
  • Who funds Arts For Life ↗
  • Who funds FELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN ATHLETES ↗
  • Who funds PIEDMONT LAND CONSERVANCY ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL PARKS CONSERVATION ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds GUILFORD COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds BAPS CHARITIES INC ↗
  • Who funds THE BARNABAS NETWORK ↗
  • Who funds EB RESEARCH PARTNERSHIP INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Winston-Salem FoundationNC18.7× affinity7 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Winston-Salem Foundation · Lincoln Financial Foundation Inc · Community Foundation of Greater Greensboro Inc · The Cannon Foundation Inc · Foundation for the Carolinas · The Stout Family Foundation · The Hummel Family Fund Inc · The Lookout Foundation · Anderson Family Foundation · Griffin Family Foundation · William a Stern Foundation · Hagan Family Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization George Andreve Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from George Andreve Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%8%15%22%30%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    8report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–30%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 78 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on George Andreve’s filings →

    More from the funding graph