Skip to content

· Private foundation

George&Marion Buerkel Oscar&Ella Zoellner Fdn

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$133k
Granted FY2025still arriving
12
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$42k
Largest
01What it funds
0190% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2025.

Education$595kCommunity Improvement$167kArts & Culture$108kRecreation & Sports$45kPublic Safety & Disaster$41kFood & Nutrition$29kHealth$19kPublic Benefit$12kOther$0
02FY2025 · 12 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k8 grants · $39k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $95k
$5,500
Median grant
3
States reached
$2.0M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
VARIOUS EO COMMUNITY GRANTS$41,900
EASTEN OREGON UNIVERSITY$28,500
Individual grant recipient$12,500
UTAH STATE$12,000
BLUE MT COMM COLLEGE$8,000
OREGON STATE UNIV$5,500
SHRINERS HOSPITL FOR CHILDREN$5,000
Individual grant recipient$4,000
Individual grant recipient$4,000
LEWIS-CLARK STATE COLLEGE$4,000
BAKER CO FAIR HW$4,000
Individual grant recipient$4,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY18–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 97% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%UNIVERSITY OF ID: $11k → 16%BYU IDAHO: $27k → 22%Michigan Lutheran Seminary: $10k → 18%CENTRAL OREGON CC: $9k → 10%VARIOUS EO COMMUNITY GRANTS: $57k → 15%BLUE MTN COMM COLL: $21k → 16%TREASURE VALLEY CC: $8k → 20%UTAH STATE: $12k → 12%BYU IDAHO: $13k → 22%Michigan Lutheran Seminary: $10k → 18%VARIOUS EO COMMUNITY GRANTS: $42k → 15%CROSSROADS ART CENTER: $10k → 16%UTAH STATE: $12k → 12%BYU IDAHO: $10k → 22%Michigan Lutheran Seminary: $10k → 18%VARIOUS EO COMMUNITY GRANTS: $35k → 15%BLUE MTN COMM COLL: $10k → 16%UTAH STATE: $11k → 12%Michigan Lutheran Seminary: $10k → 18%BYU: $25k → 15%CROSSROADS ART CENTER: $9k → 16%BYU: $18k → 15%BLUE MTN COMM COLL: $9k → 16%NORTH POWDER COMMUNITY PARTNER: $15k → 15%BLUE MT COMMUNITY COLLEGE: $9k → 16%NP CEMETARY DISTRICT: $14k → 15%EASTERN OREGON REGIONAL THEATRE INC: $8k → 16%UTAH STATE: $14k → 15%NORTH POWDER CHARTER SCHOOL: $13k → 15%OSU: $11k → 15%NORTH POWDER RURAL FIRE DISTRICT: $10k → 15%NPSD 8J: $10k → 15%NP CEMETARY DISTRICT: $10k → 15%NORTH POWDER COMMUNITY PARTNER: $10k → 15%UTAH STATE: $10k → 15%NORTH POWDER RURAL FIRE DEPT: $9k → 15%BYU: $9k → 15%EASTERN OR LIVESTOCK: $14k → 16%EASTERN OREGON MUSEUM: $10k → 16%EASTERN OREGON MUSEUM: $10k → 16%EASTEN OREGON UNIVERSITY: $29k → 15%EASTEN OREGON UNIVERSITY: $26k → 15%EOU: $20k → 15%EOU: $19k → 15%EASTERN OR UNIVERSITY: $18k → 15%EOU: $13k → 15%EOU: $12k → 15%EOU: $10k → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
ID
MT
MI
OR
WY
CA
UT
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

87%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$969k · 44 repeat orgs$149k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +126% since the first grant, against +23% for those funded once.

44 repeat relationships: 10 still active in FY2025, 34 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

44
26

Total granted

$969k
$141k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+126%
+23%

Still filing today

11%
8%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 94% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $8k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationArts & CulturePublic BenefitHealthRecreation & SportsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • EO
    Eastern Oregon Museum
    4× · 2018–2022 · $29k · revenue +161%
  • EO
    EASTERN OREGON REGIONAL THEATER INC
    4× · 2018–2022 · $21k · revenue +472%
  • SHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN
    4× · 2019–2022 · $14k · revenue +126%

Funded once

  • EO
    EASTERN OR UNIVERSITY
    one grant, 2023 · $18k
  • NP
    NORTH POWDER CHARTER SCHOOL
    one grant, 2018 · $13k
  • NP
    NORTH POWDER RURAL FIRE DISTRICT
    one grant, 2018 · $10k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Friends of the Fair Baker City

Support the Baker County Fair

Philanthropy
2
Baker Community Arts Association
Arts & Culture
3
Oregon Trail Preservation Trust Inc

Promotion of The Bureau of Land Management's Oregon Trail Interpretive Center at Flagstaff hill and other historic and cultural aspects of Baker County, OR.

Recreation & Sports
4
Baker City Downtown

Baker City Downtown (BCD) is an organization that strives to preserve and enhance the vitality and character of our community through the beautification, promotion and development of downtown Baker City.

Community Improvement
5
Mount Baker Theatre

The Mount Baker Theatre Organization enriches our region's culture through dynamic performances and arts education, inspiring engagement in the community, and stewardship of a national historic treasure.

Arts & Culture
6
Rainier Oregon Historical Museum

Preserving the past via a local museum.

Arts & Culture
7
Deschutes County Historical Society

Preserve, promote and celebrate our local history

—
8
Cook Museum of Natural Science
Arts & Culture
9
Umatilla County Historical Society

The Umatilla County Historical Society collects, preserves, interprets and presents objects and stories unique to the region.

Arts & Culture
10
Fox Theater Foundation

The fox theater foundation is dedicated to restoring and operating the fox theater located in bakersfield, california.

Unclassified
11
Oregon Energy Systems Technology and Research
Environment
12
Bunbury Repertory Theatre Company

To Provide An Enriching and Diverse Theatre Experiance

Arts & Culture
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Cross the Divide; the most unlike its peers is Baker Soccer United. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 72 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
7/9
Grantees still filing
5/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

VARIOUS EO COMMUNITY GRANTS: $133,907 · OtherVARIOUS EO COMMUNITY GRANTSEOU: $73,000 · OtherEOUBYU: $58,000 · OtherBYUEASTEN OREGON UNIVERSITY: $54,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $48,666 · OtherBLUE MTN COMM COLL: $43,000 · OtherMichigan Lutheran Seminary: $40,000 · OtherUTAH STATE UNIVERSITY: $35,000 · Other+57 more: $554,617 · Other+57 moreEASTERN OREGON REGIONAL THEATER INC: $20,800 · Arts & CultureFriends Of The Oregon Trail Regional Museum Inc: $5,000 · Arts & CultureCORBAN UNIVERSITY: $12,000 · EducationCAL POLY CORPORATION: $4,000 · EducationSHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN: $14,000 · HealthCROSS THE DIVIDE: $11,500 · Public BenefitBaker Soccer United: $10,000 · Recreation & Sports
Other$1,040,190Arts & Culture$25,800Education$16,000Health$14,000Public Benefit$11,500Recreation & Sports$10,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10k$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetEastern Oregon Museum: $28,500 over 4y, 17% of budgetEASTERN OREGON REGIONAL THEATER INC: $20,800 over 4y, 8.4% of budgetSHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN: $14,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetCORBAN UNIVERSITY: $12,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCROSS THE DIVIDE: $11,500 over 3y, 2.4% of budgetHISTORIC BAKER CITY CHARITABLE FUND LTD: $7,500 over 1y, 100% of budgetFriends Of The Oregon Trail Regional Museum Inc: $5,000 over 1y, 7.2% of budgetCAL POLY CORPORATION: $4,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Eastern Oregon Museum ↗
  • Who funds EASTERN OREGON REGIONAL THEATER INC ↗
  • Who funds SHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN ↗
  • Who funds CORBAN UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds CROSS THE DIVIDE ↗
  • Who funds Baker Soccer United ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Leo Adler TrustIL20× affinity7 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Leo Adler Trust · The Oregon Community Foundation · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization George&Marion Buerkel Oscar&Ella Zoellner Fdn funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from George&Marion Buerkel Oscar&Ella Zoellner Fdn. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 30%1%5%11%20%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →median 3%
  • Corban University: 3% of income from government
  • Shriners Hospitals for Children: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
3get no government money at all
1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to George&Marion Buerkel Oscar&Ella Zoellner Fdn?

Find your warmest path to George&Marion Buerkel Oscar&Ella Zoellner Fdn through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 72 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on George&Marion Buerkel Oscar&Ella Zoellner Fdn’s filings →

More from the funding graph