Skip to content

· Private foundation

George & Frances Schwenkner Charttr

Its FY2023 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$497k
Granted FY2023
10
Grants FY2023
3
States reached
$50k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2023.

Health$352kYouth Development$68kEducation$59kFood & Nutrition$59kAnimals$50k
02FY2023 · 10 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$49,706
Median grant
3
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
LIFESCAPE COMMUNITY SERVICES INC$49,706
BARBARA OLSON CENTER OF HOPE$49,706
AMERICAN DIABETES ASSOCIATION$49,706
ROCK VALLEY COLLEGE FOUNDATION$49,706
EASTER SEALS CHLDRN DEVELOPMNT CNTR$49,706
THE ROSECRANCE FOUNDATION$49,706
AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY$49,706
GIRL SCOUTS OF NORTHERN ILLINOIS$49,706
N ILLINOIS HOSPICE ASSOCIATION$49,706
CENTER FOR SIGHT & HEARING$49,453
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–23, $59k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%BARBARA OLSON CENTER OF HOPE: $50k → 15%BARBARA OLSON CENTER OF HOPE: $6k → 15%BARBARA OLSON CENTER OF HOPE: $1k → 15%BARBARA OLSON CENTER OF HOPE: $869 → 15%BARBARA OLSON CENTER OF HOPE: $623 → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

83%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$488k · 10 repeat orgs$99k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +33% since the first grant, against -79% for those funded once.

10 repeat relationships: 8 still active in FY2023, 2 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2023 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

10
2

Total granted

$488k
$99k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+33%
-79%

Still filing today

80%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2023, 80% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $99k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23
HealthFood & NutritionHuman ServicesPhilanthropyYouth DevelopmentEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • LC
    LIFESCAPE COMMUNITY SERVICES INC
    5× · 2019–2023 · $59k · revenue +35%
  • American Diabetes Association
    5× · 2019–2023 · $59k · revenue +4%
  • RF
    ROSECRANCE FOUNDATION INC
    5× · 2019–2023 · $59k · revenue +172%

Funded once

  • ES
    EASTER SEALS CHLDRN DEVELOPMNT CNTR
    one grant, 2023 · $50k
  • AC
    AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC
    one grant, 2023 · $50k · revenue -79%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
National Comprehensive Cancer Network

To define and advance quality, effective, equitable, and accessible cancer care and prevention so all people can live better lives.

Health
2
Arbor Research Collaborative for Health

Arbor research collaborative for health is committed to improving patient care through research that shapes medical policies and practice. in particular, arbor research conducts health outcomes research on chronic disease and end-stage…

Health
3
National Committee for Quality Assurance

Our mission: to improve the quality of health care.our vision: better health care. better choices. better health.

Health
4
Northern Illinois Blood Bank Inc D/B/a Rock River Valley Blood Center

Rock river valley blood center, in partnership with our community, is dedicated to providing safe, high value blood products and services to people in need.

Health
5
Regional West Health Services

Health care services for the people of western nebraska and eastern wyoming.

Health
6
American Society of Clinical Oncology Inc

See schedule o:asco is a professional oncology society committed to conquering cancer through research, education, and promotion of the highest quality patient care.

Health
7
Rosecrance Health Network

Rosecrance is an integrated network of behavioral health services that provides help, hope and lasting recovery to children, youth, adults, and families. its community of 1400 compassionate professionals service and supports over 50,000…

—
8
Northeast College of Health Sciences

Northeast college of health sciences (the college) is committed to academic excellence, leadership, and professional best practices in the health sciences.

Education
9
Heartland Community Health Clinic D/B/a Heartland Health Services

Provide affordable, high-quality health services and remove inequities to improve the lives of all.

Health
10
Acadia General Hospital Inc

The organization provides medical care to improve, maintain, and restore the health of the people in the communities we serve.

Health
11
Union Health System

To serve our communities by provding innovative and compassionate healthcare.

Health
12
The Foundation for Health Care Continuums

The mission of the foundation for health care continuums is to strengthen each community we serve by providing a wide spectrum of housing and health care services that honor the evolving, aging population.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Rosecrance Foundation Inc; the most unlike its peers is American Diabetes Association. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 12 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
6/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

American Diabetes Association: $58,804 · HealthAmerican Diabetes AssociationCENTER FOR SIGHT & HEARING: $58,197 · HealthCENTER FOR SIGHT & HEARINGAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $49,706 · HealthAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INCNORTHERN ILLINOIS HOSPICE ASSOCIATION: $58,804 · OtherNORTHERN ILLINOIS HOSPIC…EASTER SEALS CHLDRN DEVELOPMNT CNTR: $49,706 · OtherEASTER SEALS CHLDRN DEVE…AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY: $9,098 · OtherAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETYEASTERSEALS CHLDRN DEVLPMNT CNTR: $9,098 · OtherEASTERSEALS CHLDRN DEVLP…LIFESCAPE COMMUNITY SERVICES INC: $58,804 · Food & NutritionLIFESCAPE C…BARBARA OLSON CENTER OF HOPE: $58,804 · Human ServicesBARBARA OLS…ROSECRANCE FOUNDATION INC: $58,804 · PhilanthropyROSECRANCE …GIRL SCOUTS OF NORTHERN ILLINOIS: $58,804 · Youth DevelopmentGIRL SCOUTS…ROCK VALLEY COLLEGE FOUNDATION: $58,804 · EducationROCK VALLEY…
Health$166,707Other$126,706Food & Nutrition$58,804Human Services$58,804Philanthropy$58,804Youth Development$58,804Education$58,804

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetLIFESCAPE COMMUNITY SERVICES INC: $58,804 over 5y, 0.6% of budgetAmerican Diabetes Association: $58,804 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetBARBARA OLSON CENTER OF HOPE: $58,804 over 5y, 2.5% of budgetROSECRANCE FOUNDATION INC: $58,804 over 5y, 2.7% of budgetGIRL SCOUTS OF NORTHERN ILLINOIS: $58,804 over 5y, 0.8% of budgetROCK VALLEY COLLEGE FOUNDATION: $58,804 over 5y, 2.5% of budgetNORTHERN ILLINOIS HOSPICE ASSOCIATION: $58,804 over 5y, 0.6% of budgetCENTER FOR SIGHT & HEARING: $58,197 over 5y, 2.6% of budgetAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $49,706 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds LIFESCAPE COMMUNITY SERVICES INC ↗
  • Who funds American Diabetes Association ↗
  • Who funds BARBARA OLSON CENTER OF HOPE ↗
  • Who funds ROSECRANCE FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds GIRL SCOUTS OF NORTHERN ILLINOIS ↗
  • Who funds ROCK VALLEY COLLEGE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds NORTHERN ILLINOIS HOSPICE ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds CENTER FOR SIGHT & HEARING ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Bergstrom Inc Charitable Foundation Xxxxx2008IL15.7× affinity5 shared granteesties to 5 of 5Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Bergstrom Inc Charitable Foundation Xxxxx2008 · Community Foundation of Northern IL · American Endowment Foundation · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization George & Frances Schwenkner Charttr funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from George & Frances Schwenkner Charttr. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 12 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2023, released 2023. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on George & Frances Schwenkner Charttr’s filings →

    More from the funding graph