Skip to content
Foundation Dossiers

New Jersey · Private foundation

George and Emma Jane Martin Foundati

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$127k
Granted FY2025(still arriving)
13
Grants FY2025
13
Organizations funded FY2024
0%
First-time grantees FY2024
Read the full brief
Median grant, FY2025
$9,871
Largest grant, FY2025
$21,150
Organizations funded a year
13 to 13
FY2018 to FY2024
States reached, FY2025
2
Total assets, FY2025
$2.8M
Applications
Preselected organizations only
Per its most recent filing; check its own site

How open it is to new grantees

In FY2024, 0% of the organizations George and Emma Jane Martin Foundati funded were first-time grantees, receiving 0% of its grant dollars.

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
The numbers by year
Fiscal yearOrganizations fundedTo those organizationsFirst-time grantees
FY2025still arriving13$127k15%
FY202413$113k0%
FY202313$123k0%
FY202213$123k0%
FY202113$106k0%
FY202013$111k0%
FY201913$107k0%
FY201813$107kn/a
99% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2025.

Human Services$404kEducation$255kReligion$90kPhilanthropy$81kHousing & Shelter$81kPublic Benefit$5kOther$0

Top grantees

Largest recipients by total granted, FY2018 to FY2025, and the share of each one’s budget the grants supplied at peak.

GranteeTotal grantedYearsShare of their budget
Brazosport College Foundation$152,76882%
McMurry University$101,81380%
United Way of Brazoria County$81,47081%
West Texas Boys Ranch$81,37381%
The Childrens Centerinc$71,29981%
Children's Home of Lubbock and Family Service Agency Inc$45,82180%
Texas Girls and Boys Ranch$45,82180%
His Love Christian Services Inc$25,47783%

Plus 7 recipients with no EIN on record ($311k), not named here.

Where it is load-bearing

Each grantee by its size and the share of its budget George and Emma Jane Martin Foundati supplied at peak.

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetBrazosport College Foundation: $152,768 over 8y, 2.1% of budgetMcMurry University: $101,813 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetUnited Way of Brazoria County: $81,470 over 8y, 0.7% of budgetWest Texas Boys Ranch: $81,373 over 8y, 0.6% of budgetThe Childrens Centerinc: $71,299 over 8y, 0.8% of budgetChildren's Home of Lubbock and Family Service Agency Inc: $45,821 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetTexas Girls and Boys Ranch: $45,821 over 8y, 0.2% of budgetHis Love Christian Services Inc: $25,477 over 8y, 2.6% of budget

Tap a dot to name the grantee.

How this is measured
Share of budget is the funder’s grant in a year over the grantee’s total revenue that year, at its highest across the years we hold; revenue is from all sources. Only grantees confirmed against their own filings, whose grants do not exceed their revenue, are plotted: the largest 8.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Charities Aid Foundat…National Philanthropi…American Online Givin…Donor Advised Charita…Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
Charities Aid Foundation AmericaVA10.1× affinity4 shared granteesties to 5 of 5Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Charities Aid Foundation America · National Philanthropic Trust · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Compare George and Emma Jane Martin Foundati with peer funders

About George and Emma Jane Martin Foundati

How much does George and Emma Jane Martin Foundati give?
George and Emma Jane Martin Foundati reported 13 grants totaling $126,877 in its FY2025 IRS filing. It funded between 13 and 13 organizations a year over FY2018 to FY2024.
What does George and Emma Jane Martin Foundati fund?
By grant dollars over FY2018 to FY2025, its largest causes are Human Services (44%), Education (28%), Religion (10%).
Who are George and Emma Jane Martin Foundati's largest grantees?
By total granted over FY2018 to FY2025: Brazosport College Foundation ($153k), McMurry University ($102k), United Way of Brazoria County ($81k).
Does George and Emma Jane Martin Foundati fund new organizations?
In FY2024, 0% of the organizations it funded were first-time grantees.
Does George and Emma Jane Martin Foundati accept unsolicited applications?
Its most recent filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and does not take unsolicited requests. Check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
Which funders back the same organizations as George and Emma Jane Martin Foundati?
Its strongest co-funders, measured against what their size predicts, include Charities Aid Foundation America, National Philanthropic Trust, American Online Giving Foundation Inc.
Where is George and Emma Jane Martin Foundati based?
George and Emma Jane Martin Foundati is based in NJ.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 15 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on George and Emma Jane Martin Foundati’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home