Skip to content

Michigan · Private foundation

George and Amy Monroe Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$143k
Granted FY2024(still arriving)
5
Grants FY2024
4
Organizations funded FY2023
75%
First-time grantees FY2023
Read the full brief
Median grant, FY2024
$28,500
Largest grant, FY2024
$28,500
Organizations funded a year
4 to 20
FY2020 to FY2023
States reached, FY2024
4
Total assets, FY2024
$1.8M
Applications
Preselected organizations only
Per its most recent filing; check its own site

How open it is to new grantees

In FY2023, 75% of the organizations George and Amy Monroe Foundation funded were first-time grantees, receiving 75% of its grant dollars.

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2023, 25% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $108k went to new ones.

50%100%’21’22’23
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’21’22’23
HealthCrime & LegalEnvironmentHousing & ShelterOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
The numbers by year
Fiscal yearOrganizations fundedTo those organizationsFirst-time grantees
FY2024still arriving5$143k20%
FY20234$144k75%
FY202220$144k5%
FY202119$144k21%
FY202019$132kn/a
96% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2024.

Health$127kEnvironment$95kFood & Nutrition$93kHuman Services$78kHousing & Shelter$65kCrime & Legal$65kAnimals$55kReligion$30kOther$0

Top grantees

Largest recipients by total granted, FY2020 to FY2024, and the share of each one’s budget the grants supplied at peak.

Show all 20 grantees
All grantees of George and Amy Monroe Foundation by total granted
GranteeTotal grantedYearsShare of their budget
Planned Parenthood of Michigan$84,50040%
Sandy Hook Promise Foundation$64,50020%
Clean Water Fund$64,50021%
Kalamazoo Loaves & Fishes Inc$50,00030%
Senior Services Inc$35,00030%
Ministry With Community Inc$30,00031%
Salvation Army$30,0003n/a
Habitat for Humanity International Inc$28,50010%
Hospice Care of Southwest Michigan$25,00030%
Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals of Sw Michigan$25,00031%
Kalamazoo Gospel Mission$20,0002n/a
Southwest Michigan Land Conservency Inc$15,00030%
Habitat for Humanity of Huron Valley$15,00020%
Kalamazoo Nature Center$15,00030%
Food Gatherers$13,00030%
Family & Children Services Inc$13,00030%
Hospital Hospitality House of Southwest Michigan Inc$12,00031%
Kalamazoo Valley Habitat for Humanity Inc$12,00021%
Planned Parenthood of South Central Michigan$5,0001n/a
Specialized Language Development Center Inc$2,00010%

What it could do for these grantees

Plus 8 recipients with no EIN on record ($148k), not named here.

Where it is load-bearing

Each grantee by its size and the share of its budget George and Amy Monroe Foundation supplied at peak.

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetPlanned Parenthood of Michigan: $84,500 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetSandy Hook Promise Foundation: $64,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetClean Water Fund: $64,500 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetKalamazoo Loaves & Fishes Inc: $50,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetSenior Services Inc: $35,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetMinistry With Community Inc: $30,000 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetHabitat for Humanity International Inc: $28,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHospice Care of Southwest Michigan: $25,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetSociety for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals of Sw Michigan: $25,000 over 3y, 0.9% of budgetSouthwest Michigan Land Conservency Inc: $15,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetHabitat for Humanity of Huron Valley: $15,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetKalamazoo Nature Center: $15,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetFood Gatherers: $13,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetFamily & Children Services Inc: $13,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetHospital Hospitality House of Southwest Michigan Inc: $12,000 over 3y, 1.2% of budgetKalamazoo Valley Habitat for Humanity Inc: $12,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetSpecialized Language Development Center Inc: $2,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budget

Tap a dot to name the grantee.

How this is measured
Share of budget is the funder’s grant in a year over the grantee’s total revenue that year, at its highest across the years we hold; revenue is from all sources. Only grantees confirmed against their own filings, whose grants do not exceed their revenue, are plotted: the largest 17.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

United Way of South Central MichiganMI30.4× affinity12 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: United Way of South Central Michigan · Kalamazoo Community Foundation · The Burdick-Thorne Foundation · Dorothy U Dalton Foundation Inc · Harold and Grace Upjohn Foundation · John E Fetzer Institute Inc · WK Kellogg Foundation · Tyler-Little Family Foundation · Irving S Gilmore Foundation · Mike and Sharon Seelye Family Foundation · Marvin and Rosalie Okun Foundation · The Pfizer Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Compare George and Amy Monroe Foundation with peer funders

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to George and Amy Monroe Foundation?

Find your warmest path to George and Amy Monroe Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

About George and Amy Monroe Foundation

How much does George and Amy Monroe Foundation give?
George and Amy Monroe Foundation reported 5 grants totaling $142,500 in its FY2024 IRS filing. It funded between 4 and 20 organizations a year over FY2020 to FY2023.
What does George and Amy Monroe Foundation fund?
By grant dollars over FY2020 to FY2024, its largest causes are Health (18%), Environment (13%), Food & Nutrition (13%).
Who are George and Amy Monroe Foundation's largest grantees?
By total granted over FY2020 to FY2024: Planned Parenthood of Michigan ($85k), Sandy Hook Promise Foundation ($65k), Clean Water Fund ($65k).
Does George and Amy Monroe Foundation fund new organizations?
In FY2023, 75% of the organizations it funded were first-time grantees.
Does George and Amy Monroe Foundation accept unsolicited applications?
Its most recent filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and does not take unsolicited requests. Check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
Which funders back the same organizations as George and Amy Monroe Foundation?
Its strongest co-funders, measured against what their size predicts, include United Way of South Central Michigan, Kalamazoo Community Foundation, The Burdick-Thorne Foundation.
Where is George and Amy Monroe Foundation based?
George and Amy Monroe Foundation is based in MI.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 28 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on George and Amy Monroe’s filings →

More from the funding graph