Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation Dossiers
Plinth

· Private foundation

Geoffrey C Hughes Foundation Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$1.4M
Granted FY2024still arriving
22
Grants FY2024still arriving
5
States reached
$175k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2020–2024.

Environment$3.5MFood & Nutrition$1.2MArts & Culture$915kCivil Rights$690kCrime & Legal$565kInternational$300kHuman Services$245kRecreation & Sports$240kOther$0
02FY2024 · 22 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • $10k–50k10 grants · $215k
  • $50k–250k12 grants · $1.1M
$50,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$24M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MOUNT KISCO INTERFAITH FOOD PANTRY INC$175,000
CAMPAIGN LEGAL CENTER INC$125,000
NATIONAL REDISTRICTING FOUNDATION$125,000
BERKSHIRE COMMUNITY LAND TRUST$100,000
BERKSHIRE NATURAL RESOURCES$100,000
PRINCETON IN ASIA INC$100,000
NATURE CONSERVANCY$100,000
BERKSHIRE AGRICULTURE VENTURES$75,000
NEIGHBORS LINK CORP$75,000
STREETSQUASH INC$60,000
GREENAGERS INC$50,000
MAHAIWE PERFORMING ARTS CENTER INC$50,000
CONSTRUCT INC$40,000
1BERKSHIRE STRATEGIC ALLIANCE FOUNDATION INC$40,000
COUNCIL ON THE ENVIRONMENT INC$25,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY20–24, $335k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 33% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%THE YOUNG CENTER FOR IMMIGRANT CHILDRENS RIGHTS: $20k → 14%NEIGHBORS LINK CORP: $75k → 9%NEIGHBORS LINK CORP: $50k → 9%NEIGHBORS LINK CORP: $50k → 9%NEIGHBORS LINK CORP: $50k → 9%BERKSHIRE IMMIGRANT CENTER INC: $20k → 12%BERKSHIRE IMMIGRANT CENTER INC: $20k → 12%NONPROFIT CENTER OF THE BERKSHIRES INC: $50k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

IL
NY
MA
NJ
CT
KY
VA
DC

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

04

Where the work is directed

The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.

About 7% of Geoffrey C Hughes Foundation Inc’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another.

Geoffrey C Hughes Foundation Inclessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address

Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

86%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$6.8M · 31 repeat orgs$1.1M to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +48% since the first grant, against +26% for the ones you funded once.

31 repeat relationships — 18 still active in FY2024, 13 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

31
14

Total granted

$6.8M
$925k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+48%
+26%

Still filing today

94%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 88% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $145k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24
EnvironmentArts & CultureFood & NutritionHuman ServicesCivil RightsAnimalsOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • BN
    BERKSHIRE NATURAL RESOURCES COUNCIL INC
    4× · 2020–2024 · $650k · revenue +228%
  • BA
    BERKSHIRE AGRICULTURAL VENTURES INC
    4× · 2020–2024 · $300k · revenue +654% · 27% of their budget
  • PI
    PRINCETON IN ASIA INC
    4× · 2021–2024 · $300k · revenue +18%

Funded once

  • EL
    EGREMONT LAND TRUST INC
    one grant, 2022 · $240k · revenue -37%
  • Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Incgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $150k · revenue +44%
  • UO
    University of Kentucky Gluck Equine Research Foundation Incgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $125k · revenue +295% · 64% of their budget

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Boston Architectural College

The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.

—
2
Native Plant Trust Inc

The organization's mission is to conserve and promote new england's native plants to ensure healthy, biologically diverse landscapes.

Environment
3
Wildlands Trust Inc

The wildlands trust works throughout southeastern massachusetts to conserve and permanently protect native habitats, farmland, and lands of high ecologic and scenic value that serve to keep our communities healthy and our residents…

Environment
4
The Trustees of Reservations

Overview - founded in boston by pioneering landscape architect and open space visionary charles eliot in 1891, the trustees is the nation's first and the commonwealth's largest conservation and preservation nonprofit.

Environment
5
Franklin Land Trust Inc

The franklin land trust works to conserve farms, forests, wildlands, and other natural resources significant to the quality of the environment, economy, and rural character of western massachusetts.

Environment
6
Nantucket Conservation Foundation Inc

The nantucket conservation foundation owns, protects, and stewards over 9,000 acres of land and coastal shoreline, conserves nantucket's rare and significant natural resources, and engages in impactful ecological research to inform…

Environment
7
Sudbury Valley Trustees Inc

Sudbury valley trustees, inc. ("the organization") works to protect natural areas and farmland for wildlife and people in the 36 communities that surround the sudbury, assabet, and concord rivers. the organization cares for some of the…

Environment
8
Harvard Conservation Trust

To preserve the unique character and natural resources of harvard.

Environment
9
Northeast Wilderness Trust Corporation

Northeast wilderness trust is a regional land trust working to preserve and restore forever-wild landscapes for nature and people in new york, vermont, new hampshire, maine, massachusetts and connecticut.

Environment
10
Berks Nature

Our vision is to be a cornerstone of excellence in the stewardship of the environment. clearly identified with our specific mission, we strive to meet the ever-changing needs of the county and to conserve its heritage and essential…

Environment
11
Bartlett Arboretum Association Inc

To cultivate and develop an expansive collection of trees, gardens, and plants for all to explore, enjoy and study; and to provide through education and stewardship, a greener, healthier, more beautiful environment.

Environment
12
Brooklyn Bridge Park Corporation

Brooklyn bridge park corporation's mission, d/b/a brooklyn bridge park ("bbp") mission is to provide an exceptional public space that connects people, nature, and the waterfront, through inclusive, innovative, and sustainable management…

Recreation & Sports

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is New England Forestry Foundation Inc and the most unlike its peers is Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyEnvironmental Conservation …Food Banks and PantriesOrchestra and Ensemble Perf…Affordable Housing Developm…Youth Sports ProgramsLocal History MuseumsElementary Literacy TutoringImmigrant Worker SupportEquine Therapy ProgramsPolicy Research and AdvocacyCommunity College Foundatio…Dance Arts OrganizationsCommunity Foundations
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 32 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number22%0%<5yr14%15%5–10yr19%9%10–20yr16%33%20–35yr13%17%35–55yr16%26%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value22%0%<5yr14%16%5–10yr19%5%10–20yr16%40%20–35yr13%12%35–55yr16%27%55yr+

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/49
the rest of the field
13%
240,396/1,819,516

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

05the grantee network

49 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 49 of the 50 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

4
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
16
Early backer (in before they grew)
48/49
Grantees still filing
37/49
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

THE SHEFFIELD LAND TRUST INC — $1,055,000 · EnvironmentTHE SHEFFIELD LAND TRUST INCBERKSHIRE NATURAL RESOURCES COUNCIL INC — $650,000 · EnvironmentBERKSHIRE NATURAL RESOURCES COUNCIL…EGREMONT LAND TRUST INC — $240,000 · EnvironmentEGREMONT LAND TRUST INCSAVE THE SOUND — $200,000 · EnvironmentSAVE THE SOUNDConnecticut Land Conservation Council Inc — $180,000 · EnvironmentConnecticut Land Conservation Counc…COUNCIL ON THE ENVIRONMENT INC — $125,000 · EnvironmentBERKSHIRE COMMUNITY LAND TRUST INC — $100,000 · Environment+3 more — $85,000 · EnvironmentBERKSHIRE AGRICULTURAL VENTURES INC — $300,000 · Food & NutritionBERKSHIRE AGRI…GREENAGERS INC — $270,000 · Food & NutritionGREENAGERS INCConnecticut Farmland Trust Inc — $240,000 · Food & NutritionConnecticut Fa…GREATER CHICAGO FOOD DEPOSITORY — $150,000 · Food & NutritionGREATER CHICAG…NEW YORK COMMON PANTRY — $100,000 · Food & NutritionNEW YORK COMMO…BERKSHIRES BOUNTY INC — $60,000 · Food & NutritionBERKSHIRES BOU…NEW YORK CITY BALLET INC — $250,000 · Arts & CultureNEW YORK CI…MAHAIWE PERFORMING ARTS CENTER INC — $245,000 · Arts & CultureMAHAIWE PER…Metropolitan Opera Association Inc — $100,000 · Arts & CultureMetropolita…BOSTON SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA INC — $80,000 · Arts & CultureBOSTON SYMP…SCHOOL OF AMERICAN BALLET INC — $80,000 · Arts & CultureSCHOOL OF A…+4 more — $80,000 · Arts & Culture+4 moreTHE NATURE CONSERVANCY — $575,000 · OtherTHE NATURE CONSERVANCYPascal Rioult Dance Theatre Inc — $105,000 · OtherSOUTH CONGREGATIONAL CHURCH UNITED CHURCH OF CHRIS — $80,000 · OtherPRINCETON IN ASIA INC — $300,000 · OtherPRINCETON IN ASIA INCTHE MOUNT KISCO INTERFAITH FOOD PANTRY INC — $255,000 · OtherTHE MOUNT KISCO INTERFAITH FO…STREETSQUASH INC — $240,000 · OtherSTREETSQUASH INCUniversity of Kentucky Gluck Equine Research Foundation Inc — $125,000 · OtherUniversity of Kentucky Gluck …Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc — $150,000 · OtherDana-Farber Cancer Institute …CONSTRUCT INC — $90,000 · Other+8 more — $321,000 · Other+8 moreNATIONAL REDISTRICTING FOUNDATION — $675,000 · Civil RightsNATIONAL R…ROCK THE VOTE — $100,000 · Civil RightsROCK THE V…+1 more — $15,000 · Civil RightsTHE CAMPAIGN LEGAL CENTER INC — $525,000 · Crime & LegalNEIGHBORS LINK CORP — $225,000 · Human ServicesNONPROFIT CENTER OF THE BERKSHIRES INC — $50,000 · Human ServicesBERKSHIRE IMMIGRANT CENTER INC — $40,000 · Human ServicesTHE YOUNG CENTER FOR IMMIGRANT CHILDRENS RIGHTS — $20,000 · Human Services
Environment$2,635,000Food & Nutrition$1,120,000Arts & Culture$835,000Other$2,241,000Civil Rights$790,000Crime & Legal$525,000Human Services$335,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetTHE SHEFFIELD LAND TRUST INC — $1,055,000 over 2y, 72% of budgetNATIONAL REDISTRICTING FOUNDATION — $675,000 over 4y, 3.1% of budgetBERKSHIRE NATURAL RESOURCES COUNCIL INC — $650,000 over 4y, 16% of budgetTHE NATURE CONSERVANCY — $575,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetTHE CAMPAIGN LEGAL CENTER INC — $525,000 over 4y, 0.9% of budgetBERKSHIRE AGRICULTURAL VENTURES INC — $300,000 over 4y, 27% of budgetPRINCETON IN ASIA INC — $300,000 over 4y, 11% of budgetGREENAGERS INC — $270,000 over 5y, 6.5% of budgetTHE MOUNT KISCO INTERFAITH FOOD PANTRY INC — $255,000 over 3y, 8.2% of budgetNEW YORK CITY BALLET INC — $250,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetMAHAIWE PERFORMING ARTS CENTER INC — $245,000 over 5y, 2.3% of budgetSTREETSQUASH INC — $240,000 over 4y, 2.6% of budgetConnecticut Farmland Trust Inc — $240,000 over 3y, 15% of budgetNEIGHBORS LINK CORP — $225,000 over 4y, 0.9% of budgetSAVE THE SOUND — $200,000 over 2y, 1.7% of budgetConnecticut Land Conservation Council Inc — $180,000 over 3y, 12% of budgetDana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc — $150,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGREATER CHICAGO FOOD DEPOSITORY — $150,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCOUNCIL ON THE ENVIRONMENT INC — $125,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetUniversity of Kentucky Gluck Equine Research Foundation Inc — $125,000 over 1y, 64% of budgetPascal Rioult Dance Theatre Inc — $105,000 over 2y, 4.3% of budgetMetropolitan Opera Association Inc — $100,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetROCK THE VOTE — $100,000 over 1y, 7.5% of budgetBERKSHIRE COMMUNITY LAND TRUST INC — $100,000 over 1y, 39% of budgetNEW YORK COMMON PANTRY — $100,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetCONSTRUCT INC — $90,000 over 2y, 4.9% of budgetBOSTON SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA INC — $80,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetSCHOOL OF AMERICAN BALLET INC — $80,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budget1BERKSHIRE STRATEGIC ALLIANCE FOUNDATION INC — $65,000 over 2y, 17% of budgetBERKSHIRES BOUNTY INC — $60,000 over 4y, 4.3% of budgetEQUINE ADVOCATES INCORPORATED — $60,000 over 4y, 1.3% of budgetNONPROFIT CENTER OF THE BERKSHIRES INC — $50,000 over 1y, 19% of budgetNEW ENGLAND FORESTRY FOUNDATION INC — $50,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetINNER CITY SCHOLARSHIP FUND INC — $50,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetTHOROUGHBRED RETIREMENT FOUNDATION INC — $50,000 over 1y, 2.4% of budgetLiteracy Network of South Berkshire Inc — $40,000 over 4y, 5.1% of budgetBERKSHIRE IMMIGRANT CENTER INC — $40,000 over 2y, 2.7% of budgetBERKSHIRE OPERA FESTIVAL INC — $25,000 over 1y, 2.9% of budgetBERKSHIRE ENVIRONMENTAL ACTION TEAM INC — $25,000 over 2y, 4.2% of budgetTHE WEB DU BOIS CENTER FOR FREEDOM AND DEMOCRACY INC — $25,000 over 1y, 1.7% of budgetMIANUS RIVER GORGE INC — $25,000 over 1y, 4.1% of budgetJACOB'S PILLOW DANCE FESTIVAL INC — $20,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE YOUNG CENTER FOR IMMIGRANT CHILDRENS RIGHTS — $20,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetPER SCHOLAS INC — $20,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMASSACHUSETTS IMMIGRANT AND REFUGEE ADVOCACY COALITION INC — $15,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetPresident and Fellows of Harvard College — $11,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTEATRO GRATTACIELO INC — $10,000 over 1y, 2.6% of budgetHUDSONIA LIMITED — $10,000 over 1y, 2.3% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Berkshire Taconic Com…Dr Robert C & Tina So…Jane and Jack Fitzpat…Lee Bank Foundation I…Berkshire Bank Founda…The Buchwald Family F…Donald C McGraw Found…The Feigenbaum Founda…Jewish Communal FundThe Velmans Foundatio…Shoval FoundationJosephine and Louise …
Berkshire Taconic Community Foundation IncMA41.8× affinity18 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Berkshire Taconic Community Foundation Inc · Dr Robert C & Tina Sohn Foundation · Jane and Jack Fitzpatrick Trust · Lee Bank Foundation Inc · Berkshire Bank Foundation Inc · The Buchwald Family Foundation · Donald C McGraw Foundation Inc · The Feigenbaum Foundation Inc · Jewish Communal Fund · The Velmans Foundation Inc · Shoval Foundation · Josephine and Louise Crane Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Geoffrey C Hughes Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 60%6%25%56%100%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 7%
  • 1BERKSHIRE Strategic Alliance Foundation Inc — 100% of income from government
  • New England Forestry Foundation Inc — 88% of income from government
  • Save the Sound — 37% of income from government
  • Nonprofit Center of the Berkshires Inc — 18% of income from government
  • Connecticut Land Conservation Council Inc — 12% of income from government
  • Berkshire Immigrant Center Inc — 9% of income from government
  • Massachusetts Immigrant and Refugee Advocacy Coalition Inc — 8% of income from government
  • President and Fellows of Harvard College — 7% of income from government
  • Connecticut Farmland Trust Inc — 7% of income from government
  • Greenagers Inc — 7% of income from government
  • Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc — 7% of income from government
  • Construct Inc — 4% of income from government
  • Mahaiwe Performing Arts Center Inc — 2% of income from government
  • Egremont Land Trust Inc — 2% of income from government
  • Berkshire Natural Resources Council Inc — 1% of income from government
  • Berkshire Agricultural Ventures Inc — 1% of income from government
  • Jacob's Pillow Dance Festival Inc — 1% of income from government
  • Boston Symphony Orchestra Inc — 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
6get no government money at all
9report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
2rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Geoffrey C Hughes Foundation Inc?

Find your warmest path to Geoffrey C Hughes Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 50 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home
State money flows
the interactive map of money crossing state lines