Skip to content
Genesis Healthcare System at a glanceMostly funded, not a grantmaker: see who funds it →

· Public charity

Genesis Healthcare System

We serve our community by helping each person achieve their optimal health and well-being by providing compassionate, exceptional, and affordable healthcare services.

$572k
Granted FY2024still arriving
9
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$64k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Health$602kPhilanthropy$181kHuman Services$55kCommunity Improvement$20kRecreation & Sports$8kYouth Development$8k
02FY2024 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 9 grants below total $289,827, the rows itemized in this filing. The $572,423 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $282,596 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k2 grants · $13k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $50k
  • $50k–250k4 grants · $227k
$20,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$728M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
GENESIS HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION$63,919
MUSKINGUM VALLEY HEALTH CENTER$55,000
BUCKEYE VALLEY FAMILY YMCA$55,000
GENESIS HEALTHCARE NURSES LINE$53,392
UNITED WAY OF MPM COUNTIES$20,000
OUR TOWN COSHOCTON$20,000
MUSKINGUM COUNTY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION$10,000
JUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT OF CENTRAL OHIO$7,500
UNITED WAY OF COSHOCTON COUNTY$5,016
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY24–24, $55k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 13%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 13%BUCKEYE VALLEY FAMILY YMCA: $55k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

89%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$757k · 6 repeat orgs$90k to everyone else

6 repeat relationships: 4 still active in FY2024, 2 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

6
1

Total granted

$757k
$8k

Still filing today

83%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 71% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $83k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
HealthPhilanthropyHuman ServicesCommunity ImprovementInternationalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • GH
    GENESIS HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION
    5× · 2018–2024 · $422k
  • UW
    UNITED WAY OF MUSKINGUM PERRY AND MORGAN COUNTIES INC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $143k · revenue -35%
  • MV
    Muskingum Valley Health Center
    5× · 2017–2024 · $111k · revenue +135%

Funded once

  • ZS
    ZANESVILLE SPORTS INC
    one grant, 2023 · $8k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Union Health System

To serve our communities by provding innovative and compassionate healthcare.

Health
2
United Way of Central Ohio Inc

United way of central ohio is the local organization that harnesses the power of communities working together - people, nonprofits, businesses and government - to create a stronger, more equitable central ohio. see schedule o.we do this…

Philanthropy
3
Union Hospital Inc

We exist to serve our patients with compassionate health care of the highest quality.

Health
4
Columbus Community Clinical Oncology Program

Our mission is to deliver state-of-the-art cancer care to patients in their communities through clinical trials. this allows individuals to remain in their won neighborhoods, while receiving the latest and best in cancer screenings,…

—
5
Upson County Hospital Inc

Upson regional medical center is committed to delivering compassionate, expert care that builds trust, honors dignity and strengthens our communities.

Health
6
Cayuga Medical Associates Pc

Cayuga Medical Associates, as a member of Cayuga Health System, will remain the region's leading healthcare system, and most trusted driver of integrated health services, together with valued partners. We empower our people and employ our…

Health
7
Acadia General Hospital Inc

The organization provides medical care to improve, maintain, and restore the health of the people in the communities we serve.

Health
8
Cedar Valley United Way

Uniting our community to empower individuals and families to thrive.

Philanthropy
9
United Way of Central Alabama Inc

Uwca's mission is to increase the organized capacity of people to care for one another and to improve their community. we are engaged in blount, chilton, jefferson, shelby, st. clair and walker counties to create community-based solutions.

Philanthropy
10
United Way of Cumberland County Inc

Organization is dedicated to raising funds for programs that meet the human care needs of the people of cumberland county.

Philanthropy
11
Community Hospital Association of Mccook

Leading our region to a healthier future.

Health
12
Columbus Medical Association

We are physicians and other experts improving the health of caregivers, patients and communities.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is American Cancer Society Inc; the most unlike its peers is American Heart Association Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 11 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/10
Grantees still filing
4/10
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

GENESIS HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION: $422,286 · OtherGENESIS HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION+2 more: $20,016 · OtherMuskingum Valley Health Center: $110,638 · HealthMuskingum Valley Health…American Heart Association Inc: $51,000 · HealthAmerican Heart Associat…AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $18,500 · HealthAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY…UNITED WAY OF MUSKINGUM PERRY AND MORGAN COUNTIES INC: $142,500 · PhilanthropyUNITED WAY OF MUSKING…THE MUSKINGUM COUNTY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $25,775 · PhilanthropyTHE MUSKINGUM COUNTY …Licking County Family YMCA: $55,000 · Human ServicesOUR TOWN COSHOCTON: $20,000 · Community ImprovementJunior Achievement of Central Ohio Inc: $7,500 · International
Other$442,302Health$180,138Philanthropy$168,275Human Services$55,000Community Improvement$20,000International$7,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetUNITED WAY OF MUSKINGUM PERRY AND MORGAN COUNTIES INC: $142,500 over 8y, 3.0% of budgetMuskingum Valley Health Center: $110,638 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetLicking County Family YMCA: $55,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc: $51,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHE MUSKINGUM COUNTY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $25,775 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetOUR TOWN COSHOCTON: $20,000 over 1y, 19% of budgetAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $18,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED WAY OF COSHOCTON COUNTY INC: $12,516 over 2y, 2.3% of budgetJunior Achievement of Central Ohio Inc: $7,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Park National Corpora…Peoples Bank Foundati…Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
Park National Corporation FoundationOH17.8× affinity6 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Park National Corporation Foundation · Peoples Bank Foundation · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Genesis Healthcare System funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Genesis Healthcare System. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%5%11%20%funder's share of their income ↑0%8%15%22%30%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–30%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 11 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Genesis Healthcare System’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home