Skip to content

Oklahoma · Private foundation

Genave K Rogers Char

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$910k
Granted FY2024(still arriving)
21
Grants FY2024
14
Organizations funded FY2023
0%
First-time grantees FY2023
Read the full brief
Median grant, FY2024
$15,000
Largest grant, FY2024
$250,000
Organizations funded a year
12 to 14
FY2017 to FY2023
States reached, FY2024
1
Total assets, FY2024
$13M
Applications
Preselected organizations only
Per its most recent filing; check its own site

How open it is to new grantees

In FY2023, 0% of the organizations Genave K Rogers Char funded were first-time grantees, receiving 0% of its grant dollars.

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2023, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23
Human ServicesYouth DevelopmentPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
The numbers by year
Fiscal yearOrganizations fundedTo those organizationsFirst-time grantees
FY2024still arriving15$910k7%
FY202314$875k0%
FY202214$1.0M7%
FY202114$887k7%
FY202014$1.1M7%
FY201913$712k8%
FY201813$608k8%
FY201712$591kn/a
100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Education$3.3MEmployment$2.4MHuman Services$869kYouth Development$268kHealth$88kHousing & Shelter$40k

Top grantees

Largest recipients by total granted, FY2017 to FY2024, and the share of each one’s budget the grants supplied at peak.

Show all 16 grantees

What it could do for these grantees

Plus 2 recipients with no EIN on record ($153k), not named here.

Where it is load-bearing

Each grantee by its size and the share of its budget Genave K Rogers Char supplied at peak.

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetA New Leaf Inc: $2,350,050 over 8y, 6.2% of budgetThe University of Tulsa: $2,133,000 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetTulsa Boys' Home Inc: $480,000 over 8y, 1.5% of budgetThe San Miguel School of Tulsa: $393,050 over 8y, 9.6% of budgetLittle Light House Inc: $379,550 over 8y, 1.7% of budgetDrexel Academy Inc: $221,050 over 8y, 7.1% of budgetRiverfield Country Day School: $167,550 over 8y, 0.3% of budgetThe Center for Individuals With Physical Challenges: $88,050 over 8y, 1.0% of budgetGirl Scouts of Eastern Oklahoma Inc: $82,800 over 6y, 0.5% of budgetEducation for Scholars Inc: $75,050 over 8y, 8.9% of budgetBristow Education Foundation: $50,000 over 5y, 18% of budgetTulsa Day Center Inc: $39,550 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetIndian Nations Council Boy Scouts of America: $11,550 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetHouse of Healing Inc: $11,300 over 1y, 5.0% of budgetGlobal Gardens Incorporated: $10,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetPearl of Grace Ranch Inc: $9,000 over 3y, 1.2% of budget

Tap a dot to name the grantee.

How this is measured
Share of budget is the funder’s grant in a year over the grantee’s total revenue that year, at its highest across the years we hold; revenue is from all sources. Only grantees confirmed against their own filings, whose grants do not exceed their revenue, are plotted: the largest 16.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Ralph and Frances McGill Foundation the Trust Company of OklahomaOK22.1× affinity8 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Ralph and Frances McGill Foundation the Trust Company of Oklahoma · The Hardesty Family Foundation Inc · Tulsa Community Foundation · Tulsa Fdn Gen Fd Xxxxx8000 · Stuart Family Foundation · Tulsa Area United Way · Mervin Bovaird Foundation · The Gelvin Foundation · The Sharna and Irvin Frank Foundation · Oneok Foundation Inc · One Gas Foundation Inc · The Anne and Henry Zarrow Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Compare Genave K Rogers Char with peer funders

About Genave K Rogers Char

How much does Genave K Rogers Char give?
Genave K Rogers Char reported 21 grants totaling $910,000 in its FY2024 IRS filing. It funded between 12 and 14 organizations a year over FY2017 to FY2023.
What does Genave K Rogers Char fund?
By grant dollars over FY2017 to FY2024, its largest causes are Education (48%), Employment (34%), Human Services (13%).
Who are Genave K Rogers Char's largest grantees?
By total granted over FY2017 to FY2024: A New Leaf Inc ($2.4M), The University of Tulsa ($2.1M), Tulsa Boys' Home Inc ($480k).
Does Genave K Rogers Char fund new organizations?
In FY2023, 0% of the organizations it funded were first-time grantees.
Does Genave K Rogers Char accept unsolicited applications?
Its most recent filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and does not take unsolicited requests. Check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
Which funders back the same organizations as Genave K Rogers Char?
Its strongest co-funders, measured against what their size predicts, include Ralph and Frances McGill Foundation the Trust Company of Oklahoma, The Hardesty Family Foundation Inc, Tulsa Community Foundation.
Where is Genave K Rogers Char based?
Genave K Rogers Char is based in OK.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 18 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Genave K Rogers Char’s filings →

More from the funding graph