Skip to content

· Private foundation

Gemsy Zay Foundation Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$111k
Granted FY2024still arriving
100
Grants FY2024still arriving
13
States reached
$26k
Largest
01What it funds
0185% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Religion$661kEducation$102kInternational$31kPhilanthropy$23kHealth$20kFood & Nutrition$7kHuman Services$4kPublic Safety & Disaster$4kOther$0
02FY2024 · 100 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k97 grants · $59k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $53k
$225
Median grant
13
States reached
$92k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
BHOH- BAIS HAKNESSES OHR HACHAIM$26,000
TALMUDICAL ACADEMY$15,875
AGUDATH ISRAEL OF GREENSPRING$10,865
AGUDATH ISRAEL CHARITY FUND$5,838
AMERICAN FRIENDS OF KOIDENOV INC$5,430
Individual grant recipient$4,398
THE CHESED FUND$3,448
KUPAT TZEDAKA OF BEITAR$2,500
MOSDOS BOTOSHAM$2,500
TIFERES YAAKOV$2,250
BAIS MEDRASH & MESIVTA OF BALTIMORE$2,200
CHILD LIFE SOCIETY$2,000
MOSDOS NESIVOS SHALOM$1,800
Individual grant recipient$1,600
GEMILAS CHESED$1,600
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–23, $4k) land where the poverty rate runs at 18%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%Sulam: $18 → 8%MISHKAN YITZCHOK: $72 → 11%OORAH: $50 → 11%Oorah: $25 → 11%OORAH: $15 → 11%MENUCHA: $200 → 11%MENUCHA: $100 → 11%MENUCHA: $100 → 11%MENUCHA: $50 → 11%Bonei Olam: $1k → 20%TIKVA L'DOROS: $900 → 20%TIKVA L'DOROS: $900 → 20%TIKVA L'DOROS: $700 → 20%TIKVA L'DOROS: $127 → 20%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
WI
MI
NY
MA
OH
PA
NJ
RI
CA
CO
NE
MO
KY
VA
MD
DE
NC
DC
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

86%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$794k · 210 repeat orgs$130k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +34% since the first grant, against +6% for those funded once.

210 repeat relationships: 59 still active in FY2024, 151 since wound down; 40 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

210
144

Total granted

$794k
$87k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+34%
+6%

Still filing today

16%
9%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 62% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $43k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
ReligionEducationPhilanthropyHuman ServicesInternationalHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AF
    American Friends of Koidenov Inc
    4× · 2021–2024 · $23k · revenue +10%
  • CL
    CHILD LIFE SOCIETY INC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $17k · revenue +65%
  • YE
    YAD EZRA
    4× · 2020–2023 · $7k · revenue +12%

Funded once

  • AF
    AMERICAN FRIENDS OF THE MIR
    one grant, 2022 · $25k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2019 · $4k
  • YE
    Yad Ezra
    one grant, 2019 · $2k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Yeshiva Ohr Yisroel
Philanthropy
2
Tomchei Torah Inc

Religious Teaching

—
3
Chasdei Dovid Elimelech Inc
Philanthropy
4
Zohar Hatorah Inc

Religious School

Religion
5
Friends of Yeshiva Tehilas Shlomo Inc

Provide support to further jewish education

Philanthropy
6
American Friends of Amshinover Yeshiva Jerusalem Inc

Support of religious schools in Israel

International
7
Yeshiva Keter Torah Inc

Providing secular and religious education for elementary and high school aged students

Education
8
Keren Yaakov Ben Menachen Tzvi Foundation
Philanthropy
9
Zichron Avrohom Yosef
Philanthropy
10
Kollel Nefesh Hachaim Inc
Education
11
Chevras Shabbos Kodesh Podcast Fellowship
Religion
12
Yeshiva Kol Torah Inc

Education

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Mosdos Shomrei Emunim Inc; the most unlike its peers is Keren Torah Vchesed. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

53 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 53 of the 395 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
16
Early backer (in before they grew)
49/53
Grantees still filing
42/53
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

AGUDATH ISRAEL OF GREENSPRING INC: $84,849 · OtherAGUDATH ISRAEL OF GREENSPRING INCAgudath Israel Charity Fund: $78,355 · OtherAgudath Israel Charity FundTALMUDICAL ACADEMY: $70,993 · OtherTALMUDICAL ACADEMYCOMMUNITY KOLLEL OF BALTIMORE: $37,650 · OtherBAIS HAKNESSES OHR HACHAI - RDF: $36,203 · OtherBHOH: $27,961 · OtherAGUDATH ISRAEL OF BALTIMORE INC: $27,242 · Other+169 more: $452,029 · Other+169 moreAmerican Friends of Koidenov Inc: $22,998 · InternationalFRIENDS OF BIKUR CHOLIM EZRAT ACHIM: $5,250 · International+1 more: $946 · InternationalCHILD LIFE SOCIETY INC: $17,200 · HealthCHAI LIFELINE INC: $1,208 · HealthCONGREGATION DORG: $4,950 · ReligionMOSDOS BETH YOSEF ZVI: $1,800 · ReligionKNESET MORDECHAI: $1,750 · ReligionYESHIVA LAVREICHIM METZUYANIM INC: $1,400 · ReligionCHOFETZ CHAIM HERITAGE FOUNDATION: $1,306 · ReligionKEREN HASHVIIS INC: $1,200 · ReligionPROJECT GENESIS INC: $1,000 · ReligionTOMCHEI TZEDAKA CORP: $672 · ReligionVAAD HARABBANIM L'INYANEI TZEDUKA INC: $561 · Religion+1 more: $500 · ReligionSHUVU RETURN INC: $3,101 · PhilanthropyBEIS YOSEF CHAIM INC: $2,625 · PhilanthropyShinun Vchazarah Inc: $700 · PhilanthropyTikva Ledoros Inc: $2,627 · Human ServicesBonei Olam Inc: $1,000 · Human ServicesMenucha Inc: $450 · Human ServicesJEWELS SCHOOL INC: $2,032 · EducationMISSOURI TORAH INSTITUTE: $1,300 · EducationSCRANTON HEBREW DAY SCHOOL: $475 · Education
Other$815,282International$29,194Health$18,408Religion$15,139Philanthropy$6,426Human Services$4,077Education$3,807

Showing the 200 largest grantees by grant value.

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetAmerican Friends of Koidenov Inc: $22,998 over 4y, 2.0% of budgetCHILD LIFE SOCIETY INC: $17,200 over 8y, 1.2% of budgetYAD EZRA: $7,301 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetFRIENDS OF BIKUR CHOLIM EZRAT ACHIM: $5,250 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetCONGREGATION DORG: $4,950 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetINSTITUTE FOR DAYANIM: $3,860 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetALVIN S MINTZES HATZALAH OF BALTIMORE INC: $3,663 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetMOSDOS SHOMREI EMUNIM INC: $3,385 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetSHUVU RETURN INC: $3,101 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetTikva Ledoros Inc: $2,627 over 4y, 1.4% of budgetBEIS YOSEF CHAIM INC: $2,625 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetJEWELS SCHOOL INC: $2,032 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAGUDATH ISRAEL OF AMERICA: $1,820 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetMOSDOS BETH YOSEF ZVI: $1,800 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetKNESET MORDECHAI: $1,750 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetYESHIVA LAVREICHIM METZUYANIM INC: $1,400 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetCHOFETZ CHAIM HERITAGE FOUNDATION: $1,306 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetMISSOURI TORAH INSTITUTE: $1,300 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetALUMNI OF THE RABBINICAL COLLEGE KNESSETH ISRAEL OF SLABODKA KOWNA: $1,265 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetCHAI LIFELINE INC: $1,208 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetKEREN HASHVIIS INC: $1,200 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetKEDUSHAS PINCHAS INC: $1,050 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetPROJECT GENESIS INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetBonei Olam Inc: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF TORAH BTZFAT INC: $946 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetHAVERIM INC: $800 over 1y, 1.8% of budgetShinun Vchazarah Inc: $700 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetTOMCHEI TZEDAKA CORP: $672 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetVAAD HARABBANIM L'INYANEI TZEDUKA INC: $561 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetKOLLEL TORAH INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSCRANTON HEBREW DAY SCHOOL: $475 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetMenucha Inc: $450 over 4y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds American Friends of Koidenov Inc ↗
  • Who funds CHILD LIFE SOCIETY INC ↗
  • Who funds YAD EZRA ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF BIKUR CHOLIM EZRAT ACHIM ↗
  • Who funds CONGREGATION DORG ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Dennis Berman Family Foundation IncMD63.9× affinity29 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Dennis Berman Family Foundation Inc · Associated Jewish Charities of Baltimore · The Ojc Fund · Gutman Family Foundation Inc · Jack Adjmi Family Foundation Inc · The Tzedakah Fund · Zichron Yechiel Mechel Foundation · The Jimmy and Berta Khezrie Charitable Foundation · The Jmg Foundation · Zichron Chaim Charity Fund · The Sorala Foundation · The Zev and Susan Munk Family Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Gemsy Zay Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Gemsy Zay Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 140%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →median 3%
  • Mesoras Hatorah Inc: 11% of income from government
  • Yeshiva Nesivos Hatorah Inc: 3% of income from government
  • Jewels School Inc: 2% of income from government
  • Oorah Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
14get no government money at all
4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Gemsy Zay Foundation Inc?

Find your warmest path to Gemsy Zay Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 395 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Gemsy Zay’s filings →

More from the funding graph