Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Gary M Harris Family Charitable Trust

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$175k
Granted FY2025still arriving
16
Grants FY2025still arriving
5
States reached
$40k
Largest
01What you fund
0187% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172025.

Religion$424kInternational$163kHuman Services$123kHealth$103kRecreation & Sports$53kArts & Culture$43kEducation$39kPhilanthropy$35kOther$0
02FY2025 · 16 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k9 grants · $40k
  • $10k–50k7 grants · $135k
$5,150
Median grant
5
States reached
$450k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CROSS CHURCH$40,000
SAMARITAN PURSE$30,000
SHILOH CHRISTIAN SCHOOL$20,000
Individual grant recipient$15,000
NWA FOOD BANK$10,000
KLRC$10,000
Individual grant recipient$10,000
BREAKTHROUGH T1D$5,150
SMILE TRAIN$5,000
SALVATION ARMY OF NORTHWEST ARKANSAS$5,000
ARKANSAS CHILDREN'S NORTHWEST$5,000
SHARING AND CARING OF BENTON COUNTY$5,000
JOYCE MEYER MINISTRIES$5,000
GRACEPOINT COMMUNITY CHURCH$5,000
YOUVERSION$2,500
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $98k) land where the poverty rate runs at 7%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%LIVING WATER INTERNATIONAL: $3k → 8%BETHANY PLACE: $15k → 6%KIND AT HEART MINISTRIES: $15k → 8%BETHANY PLACE: $5k → 6%KIND AT HEART MINISTRIES: $15k → 8%BETHANY PLACE: $3k → 6%KIND AT HEART MINISTRIES: $15k → 8%KIND AT HEART MINISTRIES: $12k → 8%KIND AT HEART MINISTRIES: $10k → 8%SHARING AND CARING OF BENTON COUNTY: $5k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

NY
OH
PA
CA
MO
KY
MD
AR
TN
NC
SC
DC
OK
LA
GA
TX

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

81%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$941k · 21 repeat orgs$215k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +62% since the first grant, against 0% for the ones you funded once.

21 repeat relationships — 7 still active in FY2025, 14 since wound down; 9 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

21
28

Total granted

$941k
$133k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+62%
0%

Still filing today

33%
36%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 53% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $82k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesReligionHealthPhilanthropyYouth DevelopmentCommunity ImprovementOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SP
    SAMARITAN'S PURSE
    6× · 2017–2022 · $145k · revenue +134%
  • SMILE TRAIN INC
    6× · 2018–2025 · $80k · revenue +18%
  • KA
    KIND AT HEART MINISTRIES INC
    5× · 2017–2022 · $67k · revenue +63%

Funded once

  • GP
    GRACE POINTE CHURCH
    one grant, 2017 · $12k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2018 · $10k
  • MC
    MANNA CENTER
    one grant, 2020 · $10k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Message to All Nations Man

To reach out with the message of the gospel of jesus to the last, least, and the lost

Human Services
2
Jesus in Vietnam Ministries
Religion
3
Everything Laid Down Ministries

To give the gospel of Jesus Christ of Nazareth to the poor and dejected of the world. We do this by caring for widows, orphans, and broken people around the world. We care for hem by feeding, clothing, and encouraging them in Jesus by His…

Religion
4
Thirst No More Association

Thirst no more is a christian aid organization. our mission is to improve lives, impact villages.

Religion
5
One With God

To teach the bible to pastors and church leaders in africa and asia, while funding food for orphaned and abandonded children

Health
6
Arkansas International Mission Foundation Inc

Charitable giving to pastors, teachers and workers, orphanage workers, and bible colleges in the philippines.

Philanthropy
7
Audio Scripture Ministries

Asm's commitment to the great commission leads us to serve others by:-partnering with national leaders, churches, ministries, and individuals to create and distribute scripture media to share the good news of jesus.-recording bible and…

8
Asia Us Impact

Religious

Religion
9
Face to Faith Ministry

Our mission is to make disciples of jesus christ by engaging indigenous pastors around the world. our vision is to train pastors and their congregants to share the gospel in a friendly, non-denominational approach across all ethnicities,…

Religion
10
Arm Ministries

Our global work occurs in latin america, europe, africa and asia. we assist when there is an opportunity upon invitation to do so and the united states does not have a prohibition against this activity. we are involved in humanitarian,…

Religion
11
Answer the Call International

Answer the call international is a non-profit christian ministry committed to answering the call of christ in matthew 25:40, "truly i tell you, whatever you did for one of the least of these brothers and sisters of mine, you did for me."

Religion
12
Samaritan Ministries of Hot Springs

Provide for the physical and spiritual needs of homeless men located in hot springs, ar

Human Services

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Fellowship of Christian Athletes and the most unlike its peers is Small Steps in Speech. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyPublic University Foundatio…Veteran Support ServicesPregnancy Support ServicesCommunity Health CentersChristian Youth CampsFood Pantries & AssistanceChristian Missionary Organi…
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 33 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number22%8%<5yr14%8%5–10yr19%21%10–20yr16%21%20–35yr13%29%35–55yr16%13%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value22%9%<5yr14%5%5–10yr19%14%10–20yr16%19%20–35yr13%51%35–55yr16%3%55yr+

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 8% of your grantees by number, and just 9% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/31
the rest of the field
13%
240,396/1,819,534

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

23 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 23 of the 58 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
21/23
Grantees still filing
13/23
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

CROSS CHURCH — $190,000 · OtherCROSS CHURCHJOYCE MEYER MINISTRIES INC — $115,000 · OtherJOYCE MEYER MINISTRIES INCSMILE TRAIN INC — $80,000 · OtherSMILE TRAIN INCKLRC — $41,500 · OtherIndividual grant recipient — $33,000 · OtherLIFE-TODAY — $30,000 · OtherSHILOH CHRISTIAN SCHOOLS INC — $30,000 · OtherSAMARITAN PURSE — $30,000 · OtherYOUVERSION INC — $27,500 · OtherCATCH-22 FOUNDATION — $27,500 · Other+32 more — $215,000 · Other+32 moreSAMARITAN'S PURSE — $145,000 · ReligionSAMARITAN'S PU…+2 more — $7,500 · ReligionKIND AT HEART MINISTRIES INC — $67,105 · Human ServicesKIND AT HEA…BETHANY PLACE INC — $22,500 · Human ServicesBETHANY PLA…THE CALL — $20,000 · Human ServicesTHE CALLSHARING AND CARING OF BENTON COUNTY — $5,000 · Human Services+1 more — $3,000 · Human ServicesRAZORBACK FOUNDATION INC — $25,000 · EducationSMALL STEPS IN SPEECH — $7,500 · HealthBREAKTHROUGH T1D — $5,150 · HealthARKANSAS CHILDREN'S NORTHWEST INC — $5,000 · HealthFELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN ATHLETES — $7,000 · Youth DevelopmentCATCH-22 FOUNDATION — $6,500 · Youth Development2ND MILK INC — $5,000 · PhilanthropyTHE MANNA CENTER — $5,000 · Philanthropy
Other$819,500Religion$152,500Human Services$117,605Education$25,000Health$17,650Youth Development$13,500Philanthropy$10,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetSAMARITAN'S PURSE — $145,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetSMILE TRAIN INC — $80,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetKIND AT HEART MINISTRIES INC — $67,105 over 5y, 8.2% of budgetRAZORBACK FOUNDATION INC — $25,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetBETHANY PLACE INC — $22,500 over 3y, 5.4% of budgetTHE CALL — $20,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetSMALL STEPS IN SPEECH — $7,500 over 1y, 7.6% of budgetFELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN ATHLETES — $7,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDOWNTOWN SPRINGDALE ALLIANCE — $6,500 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetCATCH-22 FOUNDATION — $6,500 over 1y, 3.5% of budgetBREAKTHROUGH T1D — $5,150 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetEARTH MISSION INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetARKANSAS CHILDREN'S NORTHWEST INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget2ND MILK INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetFINAL COMMAND MINISTRIES — $5,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetTHE MANNA CENTER — $5,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetLEATHER AND IRON — $5,000 over 1y, 7.5% of budgetNEW LIFE RANCH INC — $5,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetLiving Water International — $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWorld Indigenous Missions Inc — $2,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSpringdale Basketball Association — $1,500 over 2y, 2.3% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds SAMARITAN'S PURSE
  • Who funds SMILE TRAIN INC
  • Who funds KIND AT HEART MINISTRIES INC
  • Who funds RAZORBACK FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds BETHANY PLACE INC
  • Who funds THE CALL
  • Who funds NORTHWEST ARKANSAS FOOD BANK
  • Who funds SMALL STEPS IN SPEECH
  • Who funds FELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN ATHLETES
  • Who funds DOWNTOWN SPRINGDALE ALLIANCE
  • Who funds CATCH-22 FOUNDATION
  • Who funds BREAKTHROUGH T1D
  • Who funds EARTH MISSION INC
  • Who funds ARKANSAS CHILDREN'S NORTHWEST INC
  • Who funds 2ND MILK INC
  • Who funds FINAL COMMAND MINISTRIES
  • Who funds THE MANNA CENTER

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Wal-Mart FoundationAR23.5× affinity9 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Wal-Mart Foundation · Arvest Foundation · The Claude and Betty Harris Foundation Inc · Don S Harris & Debra D Harris Family Cha · Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund · Arkansas Community Foundation Inc · Charities Aid Foundation America · Shell USA Company Foundation · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Paypal Charitable Giving Fund · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Endowment Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Gary M Harris Family Charitable Trust funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 20%1%3%6%10%your share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    2get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Gary M Harris Family Charitable Trust?

    Find your warmest path to Gary M Harris Family Charitable Trust through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 58 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph