Skip to content

· Private foundation

Gary Aidekman Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$145k
Granted FY2025still arriving
6
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$67k
Largest
01What it funds
0196% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

International$415kPhilanthropy$170kReligion$145kEducation$115kFood & Nutrition$109kHuman Services$45kRecreation & Sports$41kArts & Culture$40kOther$0
02FY2025 · 6 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k1 grant · $3k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $75k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $67k
$20,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$2.3M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
AMERICAN JEWISH JOINT DISTRIBUTION COMMITTEE$67,000
JEWISH FEDERATION OF GREATER METROWEST$24,500
TEMPLE B'NAI OR$20,000
ISRAEL MOVEMENT FOR REFORM AND PROFRSSIVE JUDAISM$20,000
THE HUN SCHOOL OF PRINCETON$10,000
CROSSING COOPERATIVE NURSERY SCHOOL INC$3,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–23, $45k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%JEWISH SERVICE FOR THE DEVELOPMENTALLY DISABLED OF METROWEST INC: $25k → 16%JESPY HOUSE: $20k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

84%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$967k · 8 repeat orgs$178k to everyone else

8 repeat relationships: 3 still active in FY2025, 5 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

8
9

Total granted

$967k
$155k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+26%
+49%

Still filing today

38%
44%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 81% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $23k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationHuman ServicesInternationalFood & NutritionHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • The American Jewish Joint Distribution Committee Inc
    9× · 2017–2025 · $482k · revenue +24%
  • THE HUN SCHOOL OF PRINCETON
    6× · 2019–2025 · $125k · revenue +26%
  • CITY HARVEST INC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $109k · revenue +75%

Funded once

  • JS
    JEWISH SERVICE FOR THE DEVELOPMENTALLY DISABLED OF METROWEST INCgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $25k · revenue +122%
  • JF
    JEWISH FAMILY SERVICES OF METROWEST
    one grant, 2019 · $25k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2017 · $20k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Jewish Agency for Israel

The jewish agency binds jews across ideologies and civilizations together in a worldwide jewish family with israel at its center. it provides the global framework for aliyah, ensures global jewish safety, strengthens jewish identity and…

—
2
Chelsea Jewish Lifecare Inc

The organization's mission is to manage a continuum of senior care business lines that consistently provide high-quality compassionate care while focusing on the development of innovative programs and services that enable individuals to…

Health
3
Metropolitan Jewish Health System Inc

Mjhs health system is a charitable not-for-profit established to support the activities of affiliated organizations. mjhs is built on the core values of compassion, dignity and respect, first established by the four brooklyn ladies in…

Health
4
Jewish Association for Developmental Disabilities Inc

To provide kosher, nonsectarian living arrangements for individuals with intellectual and/or developmental disabilities.

Human Services
5
The Shalom Hartman Institute of North America

The shalom hartman institute (shi) is a leading research and educational center serving israel and world jewry. we work to enrich the moral and spiritual life of israel and the jewish people, deepen the commitment to pluralism and israel's…

International
6
Network of Jewish Human Service Agencies Inc

The network is an international membership association of more than 170 non profit human service agencies in the united states, canada and israel. its members provide a full range of human services for the jewish community and beyond,…

Human Services
7
Joint Israel

To help build a more just society by creating model programs for disadvantaged populations. The activities focus primarily on helping Israel overcome the challenges facing five groups (cont. on sched O):

International
8
Jewish Senior Life

To enhance the quality of life, health, and well-being of jewish older adults, their families, and others in our community, consistent with the values and traditions of our jewish heritage.

Religion
9
Jewish Family Service

Jewish Family Service is a nonprofit social service organization that supports people of all faiths as they navigate through lifes's challenges - illness, aging , finanical uncertainty, mental health concerns, family problems, or personal…

—
10
Jewish Home of Central New York Senior Apartments Inc

Jewish home of central new york senior apartment's mission is to assure maximum independence and dignity offering a broad range of the highest quality of health, residential and community services. jewish home of central new york senior…

Housing & Shelter
11
Jewish Home At Home Inc

Providing charitable services to the elderly or infirm to assist them to continue to reside in their home environment.

Human Services
12
Abraham Joshua Heschel Day School

Abraham joshua heschel day school cultivates students' natural sense of wonder into an exceptionally rich education that encourages critical thinking, creativity, and compassion. in partnership with our families, we inspire our students to…

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Jewish Federation of Greater Metrowest Nj; the most unlike its peers is City Harvest Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 20 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
7/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

The American Jewish Joint Distribution Committee Inc: $482,000 · InternationalThe American Jewish Joint Distribution C…TEMPLE B'NAI OR: $72,500 · OtherTEMPLE B'NAI ORJEWISH COMM FOUNDATION OF GREATER METROWEST NJ: $67,500 · OtherJEWISH COMM FOUNDATION OF GREAT…URJ CAMP HARLAM: $41,000 · OtherURJ CAMP HARLAMMEMORIAL FOUNDATION FOR JEWISH CULTURE FELLOWSHIPS: $40,000 · OtherMEMORIAL FOUNDATION FOR JEWISH …ITREK INC: $30,000 · OtherITREK INCJEWISH FAMILY SERVICES OF METROWEST: $25,000 · OtherJEWISH FAMILY SERVICES OF METRO…Individual grant recipient: $20,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientISRAEL MOVEMENT FOR REFORM AND PROFRSSIVE JUDAISM: $20,000 · OtherISRAEL MOVEMENT FOR REFORM AND …FRIENDS OF THE IMPJ: $20,000 · OtherFRIENDS OF THE IMPJRutgers Hillel Corporation: $15,000 · Other+2 more: $20,000 · Other+2 moreJEWISH FEDERATION OF GREATER METROWEST NJ: $194,000 · PhilanthropyJEWISH FEDERATIO…THE HUN SCHOOL OF PRINCETON: $125,000 · EducationTHE HUN SC…+1 more: $3,000 · EducationCITY HARVEST INC: $108,500 · Food & NutritionCITY HARV…JEWISH SERVICE FOR THE DEVELOPMENTALLY DISABLED OF METROWEST INC: $25,000 · Human ServicesJESPY HOUSE INC: $20,000 · Human ServicesDaughters of Israel Inc: $10,000 · Health
International$482,000Other$371,000Philanthropy$194,000Education$128,000Food & Nutrition$108,500Human Services$45,000Health$10,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetThe American Jewish Joint Distribution Committee Inc: $482,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetJEWISH FEDERATION OF GREATER METROWEST NJ: $194,000 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetTHE HUN SCHOOL OF PRINCETON: $125,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetCITY HARVEST INC: $108,500 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetJESPY HOUSE INC: $20,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetRutgers Hillel Corporation: $15,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetDaughters of Israel Inc: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCROSSING COOPERATIVE NURSERY SCHOOL INC: $3,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds The American Jewish Joint Distribution Committee Inc ↗
  • Who funds JEWISH FEDERATION OF GREATER METROWEST NJ ↗
  • Who funds THE HUN SCHOOL OF PRINCETON ↗
  • Who funds CITY HARVEST INC ↗
  • Who funds JEWISH SERVICE FOR THE DEVELOPMENTALLY DISABLED OF METROWEST INC ↗
  • Who funds JESPY HOUSE INC ↗
  • Who funds Rutgers Hillel Corporation ↗
  • Who funds Daughters of Israel Inc ↗
  • Who funds CROSSING COOPERATIVE NURSERY SCHOOL INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Donor Advised Charitable Giving IncCO6.5× affinity4 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Gary Aidekman Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Gary Aidekman Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government →median 2%
  • Jespy House Inc: 2% of income from government
  • The Hun School of Princeton: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Gary Aidekman Family Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Gary Aidekman Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 20 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Gary Aidekman Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph