Skip to content

· Private foundation

Garwin Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$72k
Granted FY2025still arriving
9
Grants FY2025still arriving
5
States reached
$24k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$281kHealth$14kArts & Culture$7k
02FY2025 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k7 grants · $35k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $37k
$5,700
Median grant
5
States reached
$2.9M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY$23,860
THE UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO$13,350
BROWN UNIVERSITY$8,006
Individual grant recipient$6,430
SIMON'S ROCK AT BARD COLLEGE$5,700
Individual grant recipient$4,860
SYRACUSE UNIVERSITY$4,295
Individual grant recipient$2,975
AWESOME MATH LLC$2,850
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 79% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY: $2k → 8%BOSTON UNIVERSITY: $4k → 16%PENNSYLVANIA ACADEMY OF FINE ARTS: $5k → 22%STANFORD PRECOLLEGIATE SPCS: $3k → 7%STANFORD UNIVERSITY: $11k → 8%SIMON'S ROCK AT BARD COLLEGE: $6k → 9%SYRACUSE UNIVERSITY: $4k → 14%CITY UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK: $3k → 17%AWESOME MATH LLC: $3k → 5%UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN: $7k → 14%PHOEBE WANG: $4k → 21%YALE UNIVERSITY: $3k → 12%SUMMER SCIENCE PROGRAM: $7k → 8%BROWN UNIVERSITY: $8k → 14%ADDISON KROTZ: $5k → 13%HARVARD CONTINUING EDUCATION: $3k → 8%STANFORD UNIVERSITY: $9k → 8%AWESOMEMATH LLC: $2k → 5%MICHIGAN MATH & SCIENCE SCHOLARS: $2k → 14%WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY: $24k → 11%BROWN UNIVERSITY: $4k → 14%THE UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO: $21k → 14%CARBONDALE COMMUNITY HIGH SCHOOL: $11k → 23%STANFORD UNIVERSITY: $5k → 8%UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN: $2k → 14%BROWN UNIVERSITY: $4k → 14%MADELINE DEITERS: $3k → 13%THE UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO: $13k → 14%CARBONDALE COMMUNITY HIGH SCHOOL: $10k → 23%STANFORD UNIVERSITY: $3k → 8%UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN: $2k → 14%UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO: $13k → 14%CARBONDALE COMMUNITY HIGH SCHOOL: $10k → 23%STANFORD UNIVERSITY: $3k → 8%AWESOMEMATH SUMMER PROGRAM: $4k → 5%UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN: $2k → 14%UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO: $8k → 14%CARBONDALE COMMUNITY HIGH SCHOOL: $10k → 23%UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO: $2k → 14%RAY SHANG: $6k → 23%WRITOPIA LAB 212: $4k → 14%IAN KINSEL: $3k → 23%SETH DANIELS: $3k → 23%LIAM BATTEAU: $3k → 23%JORDAN JOHNSON: $3k → 23%FRANCIS BLU: $2k → 23%HWAKYOUNG LEE: $2k → 23%BILL XU: $4k → 23%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
MI
NY
MA
IA
PA
CT
RI
CA
MO
NC
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

54%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$137k · 8 repeat orgs$117k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +195% since the first grant, against +25% for those funded once.

8 repeat relationships: 4 still active in FY2025, 4 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

8
33

Total granted

$137k
$77k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+195%
+25%

Still filing today

50%
12%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 37% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $40k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationArts & CultureOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • University of Chicago
    5× · 2021–2025 · $57k · revenue +34%
  • UO
    University of Michigan
    5× · 2018–2023 · $14k · revenue +195%
  • TRUSTEES OF BOSTON UNIVERSITY
    2× · 2019–2020 · $6k · revenue +32%

Funded once

  • SI
    SSP INTERNATIONAL INCgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $7k · revenue +319%
  • PA
    PENNSYLVANIA ACADEMY OF THE FINE ARTS
    one grant, 2021 · $5k · revenue -13%
  • AS
    AWESOMEMATH SUMMER PROGRAM
    one grant, 2018 · $4k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Boston Architectural College

The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.

—
2
Lehigh University

The university's goal in the coming decade is to advance learning through the integration of teaching, research and service to others. the core of this goal is to prepare graduates to engage with the world and lead lives of meaning. to do…

Education
3
Trustees of Tufts College

Education and Research

Education
4
Manhattanville University

To educate students to be ethical and socially responsible leaders in a global community.

Education
5
The Trustees of Princeton University

Research, education and general - princeton university is a private not-for-profit, non-sectarian institution of higher learning with approximately 5,700 undergraduate and 3,300 graduate students. 2,500 students graduated in the 2024-2025…

Education
6
Columbia College Chicago

The organization's mission is to educate students for creative occupations in diverse fields of arts and media.

Education
7
President and Fellows of Harvard College

Undergraduate, graduate, and professional education and research across a broad array of academic domains.

Education
8
The George Washington University

The mission of the george washington university (gw) is to educate individuals in liberal arts, languages, sciences, learned professions, and other courses and subjects of study, and to conduct scholarly research and publish the findings…

Education
9
Trustees of Boston College

Mission strengthened by more than a century and a half of dedication to academic excellence, boston college commits itself to the highest standards of teaching and research in undergraduate, graduate and professional programs and to the…

Education
10
University of New Haven

The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…

Education
11
University of Miami

See Form 990, Part I, Line 1, Description of Organization Mission.

Education
12
Worcester Polytechnic Institute

Wpi transforms lives, turns knowledge into action to confront global challenges, and revolutionizes stem through distinctive and inclusive education, projects and research. (http://www.wpi.edu/about/mission.html)

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Trustees of Boston University; the most unlike its peers is Carbondale Community Arts Incorporated. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 48 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
13/13
Grantees still filing
9/13
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CARBONDALE COMMUNITY HIGH SCHOOL: $41,100 · OtherCARBONDALE COMMUNITY HIGH SCHOOLUniversity of Michigan: $13,950 · OtherUniversity of MichiganAWESOME MATH LLC: $8,165 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $6,430 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $5,945 · OtherSIMON'S ROCK AT BARD COLLEGE: $5,700 · OtherTRUSTEES OF BOSTON UNIVERSITY: $5,500 · Other+30 more: $67,319 · Other+30 moreUniversity of Chicago: $56,935 · EducationUniversity of ChicagoTHE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY: $30,550 · EducationTHE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNI…WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY: $23,860 · EducationWASHINGTON UNIVERSITYSSP INTERNATIONAL INC: $6,950 · EducationPENNSYLVANIA ACADEMY OF THE FINE ARTS: $4,630 · Education+3 more: $8,187 · Education+3 moreBROWN UNIVERSITY: $16,305 · Community ImprovementMidwest Young Artists: $600 · Arts & CultureCarbondale Community Arts Incorporated: $550 · Arts & Culture
Other$154,109Education$131,112Community Improvement$16,305Arts & Culture$1,150

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetUniversity of Chicago: $56,935 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetTHE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY: $30,550 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetWASHINGTON UNIVERSITY: $23,860 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBROWN UNIVERSITY: $16,305 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetUniversity of Michigan: $13,950 over 5y, 2.0% of budgetSSP INTERNATIONAL INC: $6,950 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetTRUSTEES OF BOSTON UNIVERSITY: $5,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetPENNSYLVANIA ACADEMY OF THE FINE ARTS: $4,630 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSYRACUSE UNIVERSITY: $4,295 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMassachusetts Institute of Technology: $2,360 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBERKLEE COLLEGE OF MUSIC INC: $1,532 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMidwest Young Artists: $600 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCarbondale Community Arts Incorporated: $550 over 4y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds University of Chicago ↗
  • Who funds THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds BROWN UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds University of Michigan ↗
  • Who funds SSP INTERNATIONAL INC ↗
  • Who funds TRUSTEES OF BOSTON UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds PENNSYLVANIA ACADEMY OF THE FINE ARTS ↗
  • Who funds SYRACUSE UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds Massachusetts Institute of Technology ↗
  • Who funds BERKLEE COLLEGE OF MUSIC INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a set of overlaps that mostly run through this funder rather than between each other.

Amazonsmile FoundationWA3.2× affinity4 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Garwin Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Garwin Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 12%
  • Massachusetts Institute of Technology: 35% of income from government
  • Trustees of Boston University: 12% of income from government
  • Berklee College of Music Inc: 1% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Garwin Family Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Garwin Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 48 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Garwin Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph