Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Garwin Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$72k
Granted FY2025still arriving
9
Grants FY2025still arriving
5
States reached
$24k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172025.

Education$281kHealth$14kArts & Culture$7k
02FY2025 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k7 grants · $35k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $37k
$5,700
Median grant
5
States reached
$2.9M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY$23,860
THE UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO$13,350
BROWN UNIVERSITY$8,006
Individual grant recipient$6,430
SIMON'S ROCK AT BARD COLLEGE$5,700
Individual grant recipient$4,860
SYRACUSE UNIVERSITY$4,295
Individual grant recipient$2,975
AWESOME MATH LLC$2,850
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 79% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY: $2k → 8%BOSTON UNIVERSITY: $4k → 16%PENNSYLVANIA ACADEMY OF FINE ARTS: $5k → 22%STANFORD PRECOLLEGIATE SPCS: $3k → 7%STANFORD UNIVERSITY: $11k → 8%SIMON'S ROCK AT BARD COLLEGE: $6k → 9%SYRACUSE UNIVERSITY: $4k → 14%CITY UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK: $3k → 17%AWESOME MATH LLC: $3k → 5%UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN: $7k → 14%PHOEBE WANG: $4k → 21%YALE UNIVERSITY: $3k → 12%SUMMER SCIENCE PROGRAM: $7k → 8%BROWN UNIVERSITY: $8k → 14%ADDISON KROTZ: $5k → 13%HARVARD CONTINUING EDUCATION: $3k → 8%STANFORD UNIVERSITY: $9k → 8%AWESOMEMATH LLC: $2k → 5%MICHIGAN MATH & SCIENCE SCHOLARS: $2k → 14%WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY: $24k → 11%BROWN UNIVERSITY: $4k → 14%THE UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO: $21k → 14%CARBONDALE COMMUNITY HIGH SCHOOL: $11k → 23%STANFORD UNIVERSITY: $5k → 8%UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN: $2k → 14%BROWN UNIVERSITY: $4k → 14%MADELINE DEITERS: $3k → 13%THE UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO: $13k → 14%CARBONDALE COMMUNITY HIGH SCHOOL: $10k → 23%STANFORD UNIVERSITY: $3k → 8%UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN: $2k → 14%UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO: $13k → 14%CARBONDALE COMMUNITY HIGH SCHOOL: $10k → 23%STANFORD UNIVERSITY: $3k → 8%AWESOMEMATH SUMMER PROGRAM: $4k → 5%UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN: $2k → 14%UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO: $8k → 14%CARBONDALE COMMUNITY HIGH SCHOOL: $10k → 23%UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO: $2k → 14%RAY SHANG: $6k → 23%WRITOPIA LAB 212: $4k → 14%IAN KINSEL: $3k → 23%SETH DANIELS: $3k → 23%LIAM BATTEAU: $3k → 23%JORDAN JOHNSON: $3k → 23%FRANCIS BLU: $2k → 23%HWAKYOUNG LEE: $2k → 23%BILL XU: $4k → 23%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

IL
MI
NY
MA
IA
PA
CT
RI
CA
MO
NC
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

54%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$137k · 8 repeat orgs$117k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +195% since the first grant, against +25% for the ones you funded once.

8 repeat relationships — 4 still active in FY2025, 4 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

8
33

Total granted

$137k
$77k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+195%
+25%

Still filing today

50%
12%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 37% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $40k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationArts & CultureOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • University of Chicago
    5× · 2021–2025 · $57k · revenue +34%
  • UO
    University of Michigan
    5× · 2018–2023 · $14k · revenue +195%
  • TRUSTEES OF BOSTON UNIVERSITY
    2× · 2019–2020 · $6k · revenue +32%

Funded once

  • SI
    SSP INTERNATIONAL INCgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $7k · revenue +319%
  • PA
    PENNSYLVANIA ACADEMY OF THE FINE ARTS
    one grant, 2021 · $5k · revenue -13%
  • AS
    AWESOMEMATH SUMMER PROGRAM
    one grant, 2018 · $4k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Boston Architectural College

The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.

2
Lehigh University

The university's goal in the coming decade is to advance learning through the integration of teaching, research and service to others. the core of this goal is to prepare graduates to engage with the world and lead lives of meaning. to do…

Education
3
Trustees of Tufts College

Education and Research

Education
4
Manhattanville University

To educate students to be ethical and socially responsible leaders in a global community.

Education
5
The Trustees of Princeton University

Research, education and general - princeton university is a private not-for-profit, non-sectarian institution of higher learning with approximately 5,700 undergraduate and 3,300 graduate students. 2,500 students graduated in the 2024-2025…

Education
6
Columbia College Chicago

The organization's mission is to educate students for creative occupations in diverse fields of arts and media.

Education
7
President and Fellows of Harvard College

Undergraduate, graduate, and professional education and research across a broad array of academic domains.

Education
8
The George Washington University

The mission of the george washington university (gw) is to educate individuals in liberal arts, languages, sciences, learned professions, and other courses and subjects of study, and to conduct scholarly research and publish the findings…

Education
9
Trustees of Boston College

Mission strengthened by more than a century and a half of dedication to academic excellence, boston college commits itself to the highest standards of teaching and research in undergraduate, graduate and professional programs and to the…

Education
10
University of New Haven

The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…

Education
11
University of Miami

See Form 990, Part I, Line 1, Description of Organization Mission.

Education
12
Worcester Polytechnic Institute

Wpi transforms lives, turns knowledge into action to confront global challenges, and revolutionizes stem through distinctive and inclusive education, projects and research. (http://www.wpi.edu/about/mission.html)

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Trustees of Boston University and the most unlike its peers is Carbondale Community Arts Incorporated. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 48 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
13/13
Grantees still filing
9/13
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

CARBONDALE COMMUNITY HIGH SCHOOL — $41,100 · OtherCARBONDALE COMMUNITY HIGH SCHOOLUniversity of Michigan — $13,950 · OtherUniversity of MichiganAWESOME MATH LLC — $8,165 · OtherIndividual grant recipient — $6,430 · OtherIndividual grant recipient — $5,945 · OtherSIMON'S ROCK AT BARD COLLEGE — $5,700 · OtherTRUSTEES OF BOSTON UNIVERSITY — $5,500 · Other+30 more — $67,319 · Other+30 moreUniversity of Chicago — $56,935 · EducationUniversity of ChicagoTHE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY — $30,550 · EducationTHE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNI…WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY — $23,860 · EducationWASHINGTON UNIVERSITYSSP INTERNATIONAL INC — $6,950 · EducationPENNSYLVANIA ACADEMY OF THE FINE ARTS — $4,630 · Education+3 more — $8,187 · Education+3 moreBROWN UNIVERSITY — $16,305 · Community ImprovementMidwest Young Artists — $600 · Arts & CultureCarbondale Community Arts Incorporated — $550 · Arts & Culture
Other$154,109Education$131,112Community Improvement$16,305Arts & Culture$1,150

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetUniversity of Chicago — $56,935 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetTHE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY — $30,550 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetWASHINGTON UNIVERSITY — $23,860 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBROWN UNIVERSITY — $16,305 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetUniversity of Michigan — $13,950 over 5y, 2.0% of budgetSSP INTERNATIONAL INC — $6,950 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetTRUSTEES OF BOSTON UNIVERSITY — $5,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetPENNSYLVANIA ACADEMY OF THE FINE ARTS — $4,630 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSYRACUSE UNIVERSITY — $4,295 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMassachusetts Institute of Technology — $2,360 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBERKLEE COLLEGE OF MUSIC INC — $1,532 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMidwest Young Artists — $600 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCarbondale Community Arts Incorporated — $550 over 4y, 0.1% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds University of Chicago
  • Who funds THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY
  • Who funds WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY
  • Who funds BROWN UNIVERSITY
  • Who funds University of Michigan
  • Who funds SSP INTERNATIONAL INC
  • Who funds TRUSTEES OF BOSTON UNIVERSITY
  • Who funds PENNSYLVANIA ACADEMY OF THE FINE ARTS
  • Who funds SYRACUSE UNIVERSITY
  • Who funds Massachusetts Institute of Technology
  • Who funds BERKLEE COLLEGE OF MUSIC INC

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a set of overlaps that mostly run through you, not between each other.

Amazonsmile FoundationWA3.2× affinity4 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Garwin Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 12%
  • Massachusetts Institute of Technology35% of income from government
  • Trustees of Boston University12% of income from government
  • Berklee College of Music Inc1% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Garwin Family Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Garwin Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 48 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph