Skip to content

· Private foundation

Garvie O and Kathleen Chambers Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$54k
Granted FY2025still arriving
5
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$28k
Largest
01What it funds
0199% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Religion$355kHealth$71kEducation$53kHuman Services$12kArts & Culture$1kOther$0
02FY2025 · 5 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k3 grants · $16k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $38k
$6,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$1.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SOUTHSIDE BAPTIST CHURCH$28,000
ELKIN VALLEY BAPTIST CHURCH$10,000
TRIAD HEALTH PROJECT$6,000
WESLEYAN CHRISTIAN ACADEMY$5,000
PLEASANT VIEW BAPTIST CHURCH$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–21, $21k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%ATHORACARE COLLECTIVE: $10k → 16%HOSPICE & PALLIATIVE CARE OF GREENSBORO: $6k → 16%ATHORACARE COLLECTIVE: $5k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

96%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$473k · 14 repeat orgs$20k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +144% since the first grant, against +8% for those funded once.

14 repeat relationships: 5 still active in FY2025, 9 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

14
9

Total granted

$473k
$20k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+144%
+8%

Still filing today

36%
44%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
ReligionHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TT
    THE TRIAD HEALTH PROJECT
    7× · 2019–2025 · $40k · revenue +219%
  • AC
    AUTHORACARE COLLECTIVE
    3× · 2019–2021 · $21k · revenue +144%
  • BC
    BAPTIST CHILDREN'S HOMES OF NORTH CAROLINA INCORPORATED
    3× · 2019–2021 · $12k · revenue +52%

Funded once

  • H(
    HOSPICE (ATHORACARE COLLECTIVE)
    one grant, 2022 · $10k
  • NT
    NEW TESTAMENT BAPTIST CHURCH
    one grant, 2019 · $2k
  • YC
    YADKIN COUNTY SCHOOLS
    one grant, 2018 · $2k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Walk Thru the Bible Ministries Inc

Walk thru the bible (wtb) ignites passion for god's word. by developing a global network of influential pastors and leaders and then resourcing them with tools and training, wtb fulfills its role in the great commission.

Religion
2
Christian Mission for the United Nations Community

Christian Mission for the United Nations Community is a ministry aimed at leading the head of every nation and other top leaders to faith in Jesus Christ and helping them to walk in dependence upon God as they discharge the…

—
3
247 Media Ministries

The mission of worship 24/7 is to ignite a passion for god through worship that results in a life of generosity, discipleship, evangelism, generosity and service.

Religion
4
Blue Letter Bible

The specific purpose of this corporation is to present a biblical, christian ministry of the gospel, hope, encouragement and strength to as many people as possible. the intent of those who will conduct this corporation's work is to present…

—
5
Blackwelder Ministries Inc

To proclaim the truth of god's word.

Religion
6
Time of Grace Ministry

Time of grace is for people who want more growth and less struggle in their spiritual walk. we share the truth of god's word simply and clearly through television, print, and digital media that people view millions of times each month. we…

Religion
7
Bible Open Air Mission

Purpose is sending individuals around the world to win souls to jesus christ by preaching the gospel evangelism.

Religion
8
World Christian Broadcasting Corporation

World christian broadcasting exists so that people in places best served by broadcast media become aware of the good news of jesus christ and want to know more. geographic areas that cannot be easily served by missionaries are a priority.

Arts & Culture
9
Christ the Truth Ministries Inc

Preach gospel to the faithful and spread the gospel to those who belief and the unbelief with a view to win souls for the kingdom of god.

Religion
10
Redeeming the Nations Ministries Inc

To propagate the gospel of the Lord Jesus Christ by all means and avenues, Including TV Broadcasting and other Media, throughout the world.

Religion
11
Christian Apologetics and Research Ministry Inc

To glorify god by equipping the church with proper christian doctrine and to help non-believers come to a saving knowledge of jesus christ.

—
12
Keith Wheeler Ministries Inc

Spread the gospel of jesus christ

Religion
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Back to the Bible; the most unlike its peers is Ministries of the Son of God. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 23 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
7/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

SOUTHSIDE BAPTIST CHURCH: $208,000 · OtherSOUTHSIDE BAPTIST CHURCHWESLEYAN EDUCATION CENTER INC: $51,500 · OtherWESLEYAN EDUCATION CENTER INCELKIN VALLEY BAPTIST CHURCH: $44,000 · OtherELKIN VALLEY BAPTIST CHURCHTHE TRIAD HEALTH PROJECT: $40,000 · OtherTHE TRIAD HEALTH PROJECTPLEASANT VIEW BAPTIST CHURCH: $25,000 · OtherPLEASANT VIEW BAPTIST CHURCHFIRST BAPTIST CHURCH OF THOMASVILLE: $15,000 · Other+9 more: $59,500 · Other+9 moreBAPTIST CHILDREN'S HOMES OF NORTH CAROLINA INCORPORATED: $12,000 · ReligionMinistries of The Son of God: $10,000 · ReligionCHANCE WALTERS MINISTRIES INC: $2,000 · ReligionBACK TO THE BIBLE: $1,500 · ReligionINSIGHT FOR LIVING: $1,000 · ReligionBIBLE BROADCASTING NETWORK INCORPORATED: $1,000 · ReligionLOVE WORTH FINDING MINISTRIES INC: $1,000 · ReligionAUTHORACARE COLLECTIVE: $21,250 · Human Services
Other$443,000Religion$28,500Human Services$21,250

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE TRIAD HEALTH PROJECT: $40,000 over 7y, 0.4% of budgetAUTHORACARE COLLECTIVE: $21,250 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetBAPTIST CHILDREN'S HOMES OF NORTH CAROLINA INCORPORATED: $12,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetMinistries of The Son of God: $10,000 over 2y, 6.4% of budgetCHANCE WALTERS MINISTRIES INC: $2,000 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetBACK TO THE BIBLE: $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetINSIGHT FOR LIVING: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBIBLE BROADCASTING NETWORK INCORPORATED: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLOVE WORTH FINDING MINISTRIES INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THE TRIAD HEALTH PROJECT ↗
  • Who funds AUTHORACARE COLLECTIVE ↗
  • Who funds BAPTIST CHILDREN'S HOMES OF NORTH CAROLINA INCORPORATED ↗
  • Who funds Ministries of The Son of God ↗
  • Who funds CHANCE WALTERS MINISTRIES INC ↗
  • Who funds BACK TO THE BIBLE ↗
  • Who funds INSIGHT FOR LIVING ↗
  • Who funds BIBLE BROADCASTING NETWORK INCORPORATED ↗
  • Who funds LOVE WORTH FINDING MINISTRIES INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Natl Christian Charitable Fdn IncGA9.2× affinity6 shared granteesties to 6 of 6Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · American Endowment Foundation · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Garvie O and Kathleen Chambers Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Garvie O and Kathleen Chambers Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2023
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 23 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Garvie O and Kathleen Chambers Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph